Verbal and visual representations in task redesign: how different viewpoints enter into information systems design discussions

Abstract.  We explore an important phase of information systems design (ISD), namely task redesign, and especially how different viewpoints enter into the discussions. We study how one particular visual representation, a process diagram, is interpreted and how alternative, even competing, representations are produced verbally. To tie the visual and verbal representations and the representational practices to wider social practices, we develop and use the Extended Three‐dimensional Model of discourse. Visual representations emerged as focal in bringing in the different viewpoints and as reference points for discussions. Our model provided a focused and powerful means to unveil for the outside researchers how the planned changes in tasks and authority relationships instigated a social struggle. The IS designer was an outsider to the client organization and therefore considered only the information system, not the social system in which it was intended to operate. Other participants did not recognize this, therefore, seeing the designer as furthering managerial interests. Seeing task redesign in the social context of a client organization can help IS designers and researchers to understand what the users see naturally, that is, the ISD as a dynamic, enabling but socially constrained process where different viewpoints are represented.

[1]  Margunn Aanestad,et al.  The Camera as an Actor Design-in-Use of Telemedicine Infrastructure in Surgery , 2003, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[2]  Marc Berg,et al.  Of Forms, Containers, and the Electronic Medical Record: Some Tools for a Sociology of the Formal , 1997 .

[3]  Soonchul Lee,et al.  The Impact of Office Information Systems on Potential Power and Influence , 1991, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Robin Wooffitt,et al.  Conversation Analysis: Principles, Practices and Applications , 1998 .

[5]  Chris Westrup Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction , 2013 .

[6]  J. Ivancevich,et al.  Diversity Management , 2000 .

[7]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  The Role of Material Objects in the Design Process: A Comparison of Two Design Cultures and How They Contend with Automation , 1998 .

[8]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1986 POWER OVER USERS : ITS EXERCISE BY SYSTEM PROFESSIONALS , 2017 .

[9]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[10]  M. Foucault The History of Sexuality , 1976 .

[11]  Gordon R Waitt,et al.  Doing Discourse Analysis , 2012, Discourse Analysis.

[12]  D. Knights,et al.  Managers Divided: Organisation Politics and Information Technology Management , 1995 .

[13]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  Rethinking requirements analysis: some implications of recent research into producer-consumer relationships in IT development , 1994 .

[14]  L. Wells,et al.  The History of Sexuality Vol I: An Introduction , 1980 .

[15]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Representations and User-Developer Interaction in Cooperative Analysis and Design , 1999, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[16]  L. Suchman Representing practice in cognitive science , 1988 .

[17]  M. Foucault,et al.  Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. , 1978 .

[18]  Michael Newman,et al.  INTEGRATED SYSTEM, AUTONOMOUS DEPARTMENTS: ORGANIZATIONAL INVALIDITY AND SYSTEM CHANGE IN A UNIVERSITY* , 1993 .

[19]  J. Habermas,et al.  Knowledge and Human Interests , 1972 .

[20]  Daniel Robey,et al.  An investigation of user-led system design: rational and political perspectives , 1984, CACM.

[21]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Champions of Technological Innovation. , 1990 .

[22]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[23]  Bob Hodge,et al.  Language as Ideology , 1979 .

[24]  Rudolf Arnheim,et al.  Sketching and the Psychology of Design , 1993 .

[25]  John Bowers,et al.  Talking through design: requirements and resistance in cooperative prototyping , 1994, CHI '94.

[26]  Helena Karasti,et al.  Bridging Work Practice and System Design: Integrating Systemic Analysis, Appreciative Intervention and Practitioner Participation , 2001, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[27]  G. Gutting The archaeology of knowledge , 1989 .

[28]  E. Goffman,et al.  Forms of talk , 1982 .

[29]  Ann Taket,et al.  Diversity Management: Triple Loop Learning , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Writing and Representation , 1988 .

[31]  Peter L. T. Pirolli,et al.  Modeling Individual Differences in Students' Learning Strategies , 1995 .

[32]  Austin Henderson,et al.  Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice , 1995 .

[33]  N. Fairclough,et al.  Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language , 1995 .

[34]  M. Foucault The archaeology of knowledge , 1970 .

[35]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The design of information systems: parti, formats and sketching , 1999, Inf. Syst. J..

[36]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Hidden agendas, power and managerial assumptions in information systems development: An ethnographic study , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[37]  Carol Saunders,et al.  Management Information Systems, Communications, and Departmental Power: An Integrative Model , 1981 .

[38]  Rosío Alvarez,et al.  Confessions of an information worker: a critical analysis of information requirements discourse , 2002, Inf. Organ..

[39]  J. Potter,et al.  Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour , 1987 .

[40]  J. C. Mingers,et al.  Information and meaning: foundations for an intersubjective account , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[41]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[42]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Crossing boundaries and conscripting participation: representing and integrating knowledge in a paper machinery project , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[43]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The fixation of (visual) evidence , 1988 .

[44]  R. D'amico Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison , 1978, Telos.

[45]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Making representations work , 1995, CACM.

[46]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  Toward Reference Models of Requirements Traceability , 2001, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..

[47]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Rituals in Information System Design , 1984, MIS Q..

[48]  Bob Hodge,et al.  Language and Control , 1979 .

[49]  Harold G. Levine,et al.  Politics and the Function of Power in a Case Study of IT Implementation , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Theerasak Thanasankit,et al.  Requirements engineering—exploring the influence of power and Thai values , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[51]  Randall H. Trigg,et al.  Open-Ended Interaction in Coorperative Prototyping: A Video-Based Analysis , 1991, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[52]  J. Sinclair,et al.  Towards an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils , 1975 .

[53]  Mihailo Markovic,et al.  The language of ideology , 1984, Synthese.

[54]  Rosío Alvarez,et al.  "It was a great system": Face-work and the discursive construction of technology during information systems development , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.