Optimizing CT radiation dose based on patient size and image quality: the size-specific dose estimate method

The principle of ALARA (dose as low as reasonably achievable) calls for dose optimization rather than dose reduction, per se. Optimization of CT radiation dose is accomplished by producing images of acceptable diagnostic image quality using the lowest dose method available. Because it is image quality that constrains the dose, CT dose optimization is primarily a problem of image quality rather than radiation dose. Therefore, the primary focus in CT radiation dose optimization should be on image quality. However, no reliable direct measure of image quality has been developed for routine clinical practice. Until such measures become available, size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) can be used as a reasonable image-quality estimate. The SSDE method of radiation dose optimization for CT abdomen and pelvis consists of plotting SSDE for a sample of examinations as a function of patient size, establishing an SSDE threshold curve based on radiologists’ assessment of image quality, and modifying protocols to consistently produce doses that are slightly above the threshold SSDE curve. Challenges in operationalizing CT radiation dose optimization include data gathering and monitoring, managing the complexities of the numerous protocols, scanners and operators, and understanding the relationship of the automated tube current modulation (ATCM) parameters to image quality. Because CT manufacturers currently maintain their ATCM algorithms as secret for proprietary reasons, prospective modeling of SSDE for patient populations is not possible without reverse engineering the ATCM algorithm and, hence, optimization by this method requires a trial-and-error approach.

[1]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices. , 2008, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[2]  J. Seibert X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine technology.

[3]  C. McCollough,et al.  Radiation dose reduction in computed tomography: techniques and future perspective. , 2009, Imaging in medicine.

[4]  V. Arthur The quality initiative. , 1986 .

[5]  C. McCollough,et al.  Optimal tube potential for radiation dose reduction in pediatric CT: principles, clinical implementations, and pitfalls. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  J. Boone,et al.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations , 2011 .

[7]  A. Bankier,et al.  Through the Looking Glass revisited: the need for more meaning and less drama in the reporting of dose and dose reduction in CT. , 2012, Radiology.

[8]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[9]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Evaluation of strategies to reduce radiation dose in perfusion CT imaging using a reproducible biologic phantom. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  Jan Menke,et al.  Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. , 2005, Radiology.

[11]  M. Kalra,et al.  Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. , 2004, Radiology.

[12]  Dianna D Cody,et al.  Quality initiatives: CT radiation dose reduction: how to implement change without sacrificing diagnostic quality. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  Tzung-Chi Huang,et al.  Strategies to reduce radiation dose in cardiac PET/CT , 2011 .

[14]  D. Larson,et al.  System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part II. process control system. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  C. Suess,et al.  Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[16]  Marilyn J Goske,et al.  System for verifiable CT radiation dose optimization based on image quality. part I. Optimization model. , 2013, Radiology.

[17]  John M Boone,et al.  Reply to "Comment on the 'Report of AAPM TG 204: Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations'" [AAPM Report 204, 2011]. , 2012, Medical physics.

[18]  Giang Nguyen,et al.  A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Natalie N. Braun,et al.  Strategies for reducing radiation dose in CT. , 2009, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[20]  R. Wu,et al.  Image quality and dose performance of 80 kV low dose scan protocol in high-pitch spiral coronary CT angiography: feasibility study , 2012, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.