Age-related changes in compensatory stepping in response to unpredictable perturbations.

BACKGROUND Recent studies highlight the importance of compensatory stepping to preserve stability, and the spatial and temporal demands placed on the control of this reaction. Age-related changes in the control of stepping could greatly influence the risk of falling. The present study compares, in healthy elderly and young adults, the characteristics of compensatory stepping responses to unpredictable postural perturbations. METHODS A moving platform was used to unpredictably perturb the upright stance of 14 naive, active and mobile subjects (5 aged 22 to 28 and 9 aged 65 to 81). The first 10 randomized trials (5 forward and 5 backward) were evaluated to allow a focus on reactions to relatively novel perturbations. The behavior of the subjects was not constrained. Forceplate and kinematic measures were used to evaluate the responses evoked by the brief (600 msec) platform translation. RESULTS Subjects stepped in 98% of the trials. Although the elderly were less likely to execute a lateral anticipatory postural adjustment prior to foot-lift, the onset of swing-leg unloading tended to begin at the same time in the two age groups. There was remarkable similarity between the young and elderly in many other characteristics of the first step of the response. In spite of this similarity, the elderly subjects were twice as likely to take additional steps to regain stability (63% of trials for elderly). Moreover, in elderly subjects, the additional steps were often directed so as to preserve lateral stability, whereas the young rarely showed this tendency. CONCLUSIONS Given the functional significance of base-of-support changes as a strategy for preserving stability and the age-related differences presently revealed, assessment of the capacity to preserve stability against unpredictable perturbation, and specific measures such as the occurrence or placement of multiple steps, may prove to be a significant predictor of falling risk and an important outcome in evaluating or developing intervention strategies to prevent falls.

[1]  B. E. Maki,et al.  A prospective study of postural balance and risk of falling in an ambulatory and independent elderly population. , 1994, Journal of gerontology.

[2]  B. Maki,et al.  Influence of Destabilization on the Temporal Characteristics of “Volitional” Stepping , 1996 .

[3]  W E Mcllroy Pm,et al.  Preferred placement of the feet during quiet stance: development of a standardized foot placement for balance testing , 1997 .

[4]  F. Horak,et al.  Modification of postural responses and step initiation: evidence for goal-directed postural interactions. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  Brian E. Maki,et al.  The ‘deceleration response’ to transient perturbation of upright stance , 1994, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  N Teasdale,et al.  On the cognitive penetrability of posture control. , 1993, Experimental aging research.

[7]  John F. Corso,et al.  Aging Sensory Systems and Perception , 1981 .

[8]  A. Schultz,et al.  Stepping Responses of Young and Old Adults to Postural Disturbances: Kinematics , 1994, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  W. E. McIlroy,et al.  Changes in early ‘automatic’ postural responses associated with the prior-planning and execution of a compensatory step , 1993, Brain Research.

[10]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Influence of lateral destabilization on compensatory stepping responses. , 1996, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  A. T. Welford,et al.  Relationships between reaction time and fatigue, stress, age and sex , 1980 .

[12]  A. Schultz,et al.  Mobility impairment in the elderly: challenges for biomechanics research. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  W. E. McIlroy,et al.  Task constraints on foot movement and the incidence of compensatory stepping following perturbation of upright stance , 1993, Brain Research.

[14]  Carl W. Luchies Fall arrest biomechanics: Sway and stepping responses in healthy young and old adults. , 1991 .

[15]  B. E. Maki,et al.  Do anticipatory postural adjustments precede compensatory stepping reactions evoked by perturbation? , 1993, Neuroscience Letters.

[16]  B. Maki,et al.  Adaptive changes to compensatory stepping responses , 1995 .

[17]  G E Stelmach,et al.  Age Related Decline in Postural Control Mechanisms , 1989, International journal of aging & human development.

[18]  D. Winter,et al.  Estimations of the horizontal displacement of the total body centre of mass: considerations during standing activities , 1993 .

[19]  L. Dorfman,et al.  Age‐related changes in peripheral and central nerve conduction in man , 1979, Neurology.

[20]  Marjorie H. Woollacott,et al.  Aging and Posture Control: Changes in Sensory Organization and Muscular Coordination , 1986, International journal of aging & human development.

[21]  D. Winter,et al.  Trajectory of the body COG and COP during initiation and termination of gait , 1993 .