The Adoption and Diffusion of Semantic Web Technology Innovation: Qualitative Research Approach*

Internet computing is a disruptive IT innovation. Semantic Web can be considered as an IT innovation because the Semantic Web technology possesses the potential to reduce information overload and enable semantic integration, using capabilities such as semantics and machine-processability. How should organizations adopt the Semantic Web? What factors affect the adoption and diffusion of Semantic Web innovation? Most studies on adoption and diffusion of innovation use empirical analysis as a quantitative research methodology in the post-implementation stage. There is criticism that the positivist requiring theoretical rigor can sacrifice relevance to practice. Rapid advances in technology require studies relevant to practice. In particular, it is realistically impossible to conduct quantitative approach for factors affecting adoption of the Semantic Web because the Semantic Web is in its infancy. However, in an early stage of introduction of the Semantic Web, it is necessary to give a model and some guidelines and for adoption and diffusion of the technology innovation to practitioners and researchers. Thus, the purpose of this study is to present a model of adoption and diffusion of the Semantic Web and to offer propositions as guidelines for successful adoption through a qualitative research method including multiple case studies and in-depth interviews. The researcher conducted interviews with 15 people based on face-to face and 2 interviews by telephone and e-mail to collect data to saturate the categories. Nine interviews including 2 telephone interviews were from nine user organizations adopting the technology innovation and the others were from three supply organizations. Semi-structured interviews were used to collect data. The interviews were recorded on digital voice recorder memory and subsequently transcribed verbatim. 196 pages of transcripts were obtained from about 12 hours interviews. Triangulation of evidence was achieved by examining each organization website and various documents, such as brochures and white papers.

[1]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  Toward Improving the Relevance of Information Systems Research to Practice: The Role of Applicability Checks , 2008, MIS Q..

[2]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Eric W. T. Ngai,et al.  A qualitative study of information technology adoption: how ten organizations adopted Web‐based training , 2007, Inf. Syst. J..

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Boris Motik,et al.  Ontologies for Enterprise Knowledge Management , 2003, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[6]  Nigel Melville,et al.  Information technology innovation diffusion: an information requirements paradigm , 2008, Inf. Syst. J..

[7]  John M. Ward,et al.  The adoption of consortium B2B e-marketplaces: An exploratory study , 2007, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[8]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Barriers to adoption of software reuse: A qualitative study , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[9]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[10]  J. Michael Pearson,et al.  Electronic commerce adoption: an empirical study of small and medium US businesses , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Minder Chen,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption and diffusion of XML and Web services standards for E-business systems , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[12]  F. Scherer,et al.  Demand-Pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited , 1982 .

[13]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology , 1974, Science.

[14]  J. Cockcroft.  The process of technological innovation , 1965 .

[15]  John Bessant,et al.  Influential factors in manufacturing innovation , 1982 .

[16]  A. Meyer,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multi-Level Contextual Analysis , 1988 .

[17]  James A. Hendler,et al.  The Semantic Web" in Scientific American , 2001 .

[18]  E. B. Swanson,et al.  Information systems innovation among organizations , 1994 .

[19]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Factors Affecting the Adoption of Open Systems: An Exploratory Study , 1997, MIS Q..

[20]  R. Zmud.  An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process Innovation in Knowledge Work , 1984 .

[21]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Assimilation and Diffusion of Web Technologies in Supply-Chain Management: An Examination of Key Drivers and Performance Impacts , 2004, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[22]  JinKyu Lee,et al.  Secure knowledge management and the semantic web , 2005, CACM.

[23]  Nabeel Al‐Qirim,et al.  A Research Trilogy into E-Commerce Adoption in Small Businesses in New Zealand , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[24]  Martin Bichler,et al.  Design science in information systems research , 2006, Wirtschaftsinf..

[25]  Ajay S. Vinze,et al.  Adopting ontology to facilitate knowledge sharing , 2004, CACM.

[26]  Frank van Harmelen,et al.  A semantic web primer , 2004 .

[27]  Jan Pries-Heje,et al.  A multiple‐theory analysis of a diffusion of information technology case , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[28]  J. Creswell.  Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[29]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Organizational assimilation of complex technologies: an empirical study of component-based software development , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Sree Nilakanta,et al.  Implementation of Electronic Data Interchange: An Innovation Diffusion Perspective , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  J. Dedrick,et al.  WHY FIRMS ADOPT OPEN SOURCE PLATFORMS: A GROUNDED THEORY OF INNOVATION AND STANDARDS ADOPTION , 2003 .

[32]  Arun Rai,et al.  A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  Satish Nambisan,et al.  Web Technology Adoption and Knowledge Barriers , 2000, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[34]  A. Strauss,et al.  The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research aldine de gruyter , 1968 .

[35]  Vasiliki Mantzana,et al.  Information Systems and Healthcare XXIV: Factors Affecting the EAI Adoption in the Healthcare Sector , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[36]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[37]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Post-Adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-Business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[38]  Indrit Troshani,et al.  Organizational Adoption of XBRL , 2007, Electron. Mark..

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  The Disruptive Nature of Information Technology Innovations: The Case of Internet Computing in Systems Development Organizations , 2003, MIS Q..

[40]  H. Munro,et al.  Measuring commitment to new manufacturing technology: integrating technological push and marketing pull concepts , 1988 .

[41]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[42]  강소라,et al.  Knowledge transfer for me and us theory , 2003 .

[43]  Stefan Decker,et al.  Creating Semantic Web Contents with Protégé-2000 , 2001, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[44]  A. Bharadwaj.  Integrating Positivist And Interpretive Approaches To Information Systems Research: A Lakatosian Model , 1996 .

[45]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Organizational adoption of open systems: a 'technology-push, need-pull' perspective , 2000, Inf. Manag..

[46]  C. Brodsky.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research , 1968 .

[47]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1992 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIFFUSION : A REVIEW OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH , 2017 .

[48]  A. Strauss,et al.  Grounded theory methodology: An overview. , 1994 .

[49]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[50]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[51]  John M. Ward,et al.  Understanding the successful adoption and use of IS/IT in SMEs: an explanation from Portuguese manufacturing industries , 2002, Inf. Syst. J..

[52]  Shan Wang,et al.  An Exploratory Study of Electronic Marketplace Adoption: A Multiple Perspective View , 2006, Electron. Mark..

[53]  P. Attewell.  Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing , 1992 .

[54]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1992 .

[55]  Mathieu d'Aquin,et al.  Knowledge editing and maintenance tools for a semantic portal in oncology , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[56]  R. Nolan,et al.  Managing the Four Stages of EDP Growth , 1974 .

[57]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[58]  Hung-Pin Shih,et al.  Technology-push and communication-pull forces driving message-based coordination performance , 2006, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[59]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  The Process of Innovation Assimilation by Firms in Different Countries: A Technology Diffusion Perspective on E-Business , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[61]  N. Al-Qirim.  The adoption and diffusion of e-commerce in developing countries: The case of an NGO in Jordan , 2007 .

[62]  Baek Sang-Yong,et al.  A Qualitative Study on the Process of Knowledge Creation at the Infusion Stage in IT Implementation , 2006 .

[63]  James C. Wetherbe,et al.  The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing , 1990, Inf. Syst. Res..

[64]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  Going Beyond the Dominant Paradigm for Information Technology Innovation Research: Emerging Concepts and Methods , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..