Recent advances in ecological stoichiometry: insights for population and community ecology

39.Conventional theories of population and community dynamics are based on a singlecurrency such as number of individuals, biomass, carbon or energy. However,organisms are constructed of multiple elements and often require them (in particularcarbon, phosphorus and nitrogen) in different ratios than provided by their resources;this mismatch may constrain the net transfer of energy and elements through trophiclevels. Ecological stoichiometry, the study of the balance of elements in ecologicalprocesses, offers a framework for exploring ecological effects of such constraints. Wereview recent theoretical and empirical studies that have considered how stoichiometrymay affect population and community dynamics. These studies show thatstoichiometric constraints can affect several properties of populations (e.g. stability,oscillations, consumer extinction) and communities (e.g. coexistence of competitors,competitive interactions between different guilds). We highlight gaps in generalknowledge and focus on areas of population and community ecology whereincorporation of stoichiometric constraints may be particularly fruitful, such asstudies of demographic bottlenecks, spatial processes, and multi-species interactions.Finally, we suggest promising directions for new research by recommending potentialstudy systems (terrestrial insects, detritivory-based webs, soil communities) to improveour understanding of populations and communities. Our conclusion is that a betterintegration of stoichiometric principles and other theoretical approaches in ecologymay allow for a richer understanding of both population and community structure anddynamics.S. J. Moe, Norwegian Inst. for Water Research, NO-0411 Oslo, Norway (jannicke.moe@niva.no) and Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES), Univ.ofOslo, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway.

[1]  G. Lamberti,et al.  Taxonomic and regional patterns in benthic macroinvertebrate elemental composition in streams , 2005 .

[2]  G. Lamberti,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STOICHIOMETRY IN RUNNING WATERS: PERIPHYTON CHEMICAL COMPOSITION AND SNAIL GROWTH , 2002 .

[3]  M. Ayres,et al.  Host-driven population dynamics in an herbivorous insect. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  S. Simpson,et al.  ORGANISMAL STOICHIOMETRY: QUANTIFYING NON-INDEPENDENCE AMONG FOOD COMPONENTS , 2004 .

[5]  H. Caswell Matrix population models : construction, analysis, and interpretation , 2001 .

[6]  A. Pokarzhevskii,et al.  Microbial links and element flows in nested detrital food-webs. , 2003 .

[7]  A. Łomnicki Individual-based models and the individual-based approach to population ecology , 1999 .

[8]  James P Grover,et al.  The Impact of Variable Stoichiometry on Predator‐Prey Interactions: A Multinutrient Approach , 2003, The American Naturalist.

[9]  Jan E. Kammenga,et al.  Stress induced fitness reduction is not determined by the most sensitive life-cycle trait. , 1996 .

[10]  Sangkyu Park,et al.  Unsaturated fatty acid content in seston and tropho-dynamic coupling in lakes , 2004, Nature.

[11]  Shaw‐Yhi Hwang,et al.  Within- and between-year variation in early season phytochemistry of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) clones , 2000 .

[12]  H. Mooney,et al.  Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic Analogy , 1985 .

[13]  Greg Dwyer,et al.  The combined effects of pathogens and predators on insect outbreaks , 2004, Nature.

[14]  R. Sterner,et al.  Life history bottlenecks in Diaptomus clavipes induced by phosphorus‐limited algae , 2002 .

[15]  T. White The Inadequate Environment , 1993, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[16]  S. Ellner,et al.  Rapid evolution drives ecological dynamics in a predator–prey system , 2003, Nature.

[17]  C. Duarte,et al.  Patterns in decomposition rates among photosynthetic organisms: the importance of detritus C:N:P content , 1993, Oecologia.

[18]  Thomas R. Anderson,et al.  C and N gross growth efficiencies of copepod egg production studied using a Dynamic Energy Budget model , 2004 .

[19]  G. Ågren The C:N:P stoichiometry of autotrophs: Theory and observations , 2004 .

[20]  D. Straile,et al.  INTERPLAY BETWEEN ENERGY LIMITATION AND NUTRITIONAL DEFICIENCY: EMPIRICAL DATA AND FOOD WEB MODELS , 2002 .

[21]  Bob W. Kooi,et al.  The dynamics of a tri-trophic food chain with two-component populations from a biochemical perspective , 2002 .

[22]  E. Bracher A model approach. , 1989, Nursing times.

[23]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  DYNAMIC ENERGY BUDGET REPRESENTATIONS OF STOICHIOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS ON POPULATION DYNAMICS , 2004 .

[24]  S. Ellner,et al.  Predator–prey cycles in an aquatic microcosm: testing hypotheses of mechanism , 2002 .

[25]  A. Nicholson An outline of the dynamics of animal populations. , 1954 .

[26]  D. O. Hessen,et al.  Allocation strategies in crustacean stoichiometry: the potential role of phosphorus in the limitation of reproduction , 2003 .

[27]  J. Elser,et al.  Evidence of phosphorus‐limited individual and population growth of Daphnia in a Canadian Shield lake , 2002 .

[28]  S. Hobbie Interactions between Litter Lignin and Nitrogenitter Lignin and Soil Nitrogen Availability during Leaf Litter Decomposition in a Hawaiian Montane Forest , 2000, Ecosystems.

[29]  T. Thingstad,et al.  Fate and effect of allochthonous organic material in aquatic microbial ecosystems An analysis based on chemostat theory , 1985 .

[30]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological stoichiometry in the microbial food web: a test of the light :nutrient hypothesis , 2003 .

[31]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[32]  M. Lerdau,et al.  Effects of Nitrogen Deposition on Insect Herbivory: Implications for Community and Ecosystem Processes , 2004, Ecosystems.

[33]  T. F. Hansen,et al.  Effects of microzooplankton and mixotrophy in an experimental planktonic food web , 2004 .

[34]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Superfamilies of Evolved and Designed Networks , 2004 .

[35]  S. Gower,et al.  Nitrogen and phosphorus distribution for five plantation species in southwestern Wisconsin , 1992 .

[36]  W. Stanley Harpole,et al.  Mechanisms responsible for the positive diversity–productivity relationship in Minnesota grasslands , 2004 .

[37]  W. J. Mattson,et al.  Herbivory in relation to plant nitrogen content , 1980 .

[38]  E. Mccauley,et al.  Multiple dynamics in a single predator–prey system: experimental effects of food quality , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  J. O S E Â,et al.  Host Utilisation by Moth and Larval Survival of Pine Processionary Caterpillar Thaumetopoea Pityocampa in Relation to Food Quality in Three Pinus Species , 2022 .

[40]  D. Tilman Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[41]  M. Rosenzweig Paradox of Enrichment: Destabilization of Exploitation Ecosystems in Ecological Time , 1971, Science.

[42]  M. Begon,et al.  Effects of resource quality on the population dynamics of the Indian meal moth Plodiainterpunctella and its granulovirus , 2002, Oecologia.

[43]  D. Tilman The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession , 1985, The American Naturalist.

[44]  J. Elser,et al.  Dietary phosphorus affects the growth of larval Manduca sexta. , 2004, Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology.

[45]  André M. de Roos,et al.  Physiologically structured models - from versatile technique to ecological theory , 2001 .

[46]  Raymond L. Lindeman The trophic-dynamic aspect of ecology , 1942 .

[47]  R. Denno,et al.  MIGHT NITROGEN LIMITATION PROMOTE OMNIVORY AMONG CARNIVOROUS ARTHROPODS , 2003 .

[48]  Anne Lohrli Chapman and Hall , 1985 .

[49]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Stoichiometry in producer-grazer systems: Linking energy flow with element cycling , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[50]  Shripad Tuljapurkar,et al.  Structured-Population Models in Marine, Terrestrial, and Freshwater Systems , 1998 .

[51]  J. Elser,et al.  Stoichiometric tracking of soil nutrients by a desert insect herbivore , 2003 .

[52]  I. Hanski Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[53]  Robert D Holt,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity, Indirect Interactions, and the Coexistence of Prey Species , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[54]  James J. Elser,et al.  Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry , 1996 .

[55]  M. Fan,et al.  Dynamics of a stoichiometric discrete producer-grazer model , 2005 .

[56]  W. T. Edmondson,et al.  Environmental and algal forcing of Daphnia production dynamics , 2002 .

[57]  R. Denno,et al.  Stoichiometry of actual vs. potential predator–prey interactions: insights into nitrogen limitation for arthropod predators , 2004 .

[58]  D. Lytle,et al.  STOICHIOMETRY AND PLANKTONIC GRAZER COMPOSITION OVER GRADIENTS OF LIGHT, NUTRIENTS, AND PREDATION RISK , 2004 .

[59]  James P Grover,et al.  Stoichiometry, herbivory and competition for nutrients: simple models based on planktonic ecosystems. , 2002, Journal of theoretical biology.

[60]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[61]  Andrea F. Huberty,et al.  Nitrogen in Insects: Implications for Trophic Complexity and Species Diversification , 2002, The American Naturalist.

[62]  J. Elser,et al.  Stoichiometry and population dynamics , 2004 .

[63]  Dag O. Hessen,et al.  A model approach to planktonic stoichiometry and consumer‐resource stability , 1997 .

[64]  J. Elser,et al.  Herbivorous animals can mitigate unfavourable ratios of energy and material supplies by enhancing nutrient recycling , 2002 .

[65]  Y. Kuang,et al.  Modeling and analysis of stoichiometric two-patch consumer-resource systems. , 2004, Mathematical biosciences.

[66]  D. Post,et al.  Detritus, trophic dynamics and biodiversity , 2004 .

[67]  Elizabeth T. Borer,et al.  Topological approaches to food web analyses: a few modifications may improve our insights , 2002 .

[68]  T. White,et al.  The Inadequate Environment: Nitrogen and the Abundance of Animals , 1993 .

[69]  A. Rosemond,et al.  Consumer‐resource stoichiometry in detritus‐based streams , 2003 .

[70]  M. Bandyopadhyay,et al.  Dynamics of an autotroph-herbivore ecosystem with nutrient recycling , 2004 .

[71]  P. Hambäck,et al.  Winter herbivory by voles during a population peak: the importance of plant quality , 2002 .

[72]  Wolf M. Mooij,et al.  An object-oriented simulation framework for individual-based simulations (OSIRIS): Daphnia population dynamics as an example , 1996 .

[73]  J. Urabe,et al.  Contrasting effects of different types of resource depletion on life-history traits in Daphnia , 2001 .

[74]  Zoe V. Finkel,et al.  Are you what you eat? Physiological constraints on organismal stoichiometry in an elementally imbalanced world , 2005 .

[75]  M. Loreau,et al.  ECOLOGICAL STOICHIOMETRY, PRIMARY PRODUCER-DECOMPOSER INTERACTIONS, AND ECOSYSTEM PERSISTENCE , 2001 .

[76]  J. Elser,et al.  Reduced light increases herbivore production due to stoichiometric effects of light/nutrient balance , 2002 .

[77]  Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.  Stoichiometric food quality and herbivore dynamics , 2001 .

[78]  W. R. Demott,et al.  STOICHIOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS VS. ALGAL DEFENSES: TESTING MECHANISMS OF ZOOPLANKTON FOOD LIMITATION , 2002 .

[79]  R. Lindroth,et al.  Intraspecific variation in aspen phytochemistry: effects on performance of gypsy moths and forest tent caterpillars , 1995, Oecologia.

[80]  W. R. Demott Implications of element deficits for zooplankton growth , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[81]  S. Hubbell,et al.  The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography at age ten. , 2011, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[82]  T. Klemola,et al.  Do delayed effects of overgrazing explain population cycles in voles , 2000 .

[83]  Yang Kuang,et al.  Competition and stoichiometry: coexistence of two predators on one prey. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[84]  E. Balseiro,et al.  Effects of Galaxias maculatus on Nutrient Dynamics and Phytoplankton Biomass in a North Patagonian Oligotrophic Lake , 2003, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[85]  A. J. Lotka Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[86]  S. Levin,et al.  Optimal nitrogen-to-phosphorus stoichiometry of phytoplankton , 2004, Nature.

[87]  J. Cotner,et al.  Elemental stoichiometry of a heterotrophic bacterial community in a freshwater lake: implications for growth- and resource-dependent variations , 2004 .

[88]  A. J. Lotka,et al.  Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.

[89]  É. Bauce,et al.  Does nutrition-related stress carry over to spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) progeny? , 2002, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[90]  J. Grover Predation, competition, and nutrient recycling: a stoichiometric approach with multiple nutrients. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[91]  J. Cebrian Patterns in the Fate of Production in Plant Communities , 1999, The American Naturalist.

[92]  C. Gratton,et al.  DOES INTRAGUILD PREDATION ENHANCE PREDATOR PERFORMANCE? A STOICHIOMETRIC PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[93]  J. Elser,et al.  Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere , 2002 .

[94]  Shaw‐Yhi Hwang,et al.  Effects of phytochemical variation in quaking aspen Populus tremuloides clones on gypsy moth Lymantria dispar performance in the field and laboratory , 2000 .

[95]  J. Urabe,et al.  Regulation of herbivore growth by the balance of light and nutrients. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[96]  J. Elser,et al.  CARBON SEQUESTRATION IN ECOSYSTEMS: THE ROLE OF STOICHIOMETRY , 2004 .

[97]  David W. Williams,et al.  SPATIAL SYNCHRONY IN FOREST INSECT OUTBREAKS: ROLES OF REGIONAL STOCHASTICITY AND DISPERSAL , 2002 .

[98]  S. Hartley,et al.  Effects of carbon dioxide and nitrogen enrichment on a plant-insect interaction : the quality of Calluna vulgaris as a host for Operophtera brumata , 1998 .

[99]  B. Palsson,et al.  Combining pathway analysis with flux balance analysis for the comprehensive study of metabolic systems. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[100]  J. Grover Resource Competition , 1997, Population and Community Biology Series.

[101]  U. Sommer Phosphorus-limited Daphnia: Intraspecific facilitation instead of competition , 1992 .

[102]  S. Diehl THE EVOLUTION AND MAINTENANCE OF OMNIVORY: DYNAMIC CONSTRAINTS AND THE ROLE OF FOOD QUALITY , 2003 .

[103]  Alan Hastings,et al.  FITTING POPULATION MODELS INCORPORATING PROCESS NOISE AND OBSERVATION ERROR , 2002 .

[104]  J. Grover,et al.  The light : nutrient ratio in lakes: a test of hypothesized trends in bacterial nutrient limitation , 2001 .

[105]  S. Hall Stoichiometrically Explicit Competition between Grazers: Species Replacement, Coexistence, and Priority Effects along Resource Supply Gradients , 2004, The American Naturalist.