Dynamic hybrids and the geographies of technoscience: discussing conceptual resources beyond the human/non-human binary

This paper discusses the nature of (post)-human and (post)-natural worlds by examining the types of entities responsible for knowledge production in contemporary technoscience. Based upon a case study in high-energy physics and a constructive critical engagement with actor-network thought in science studies and geography, a complex trinity of geographically relevant actants is developed and discussed as a conceptual resource for studying geographies of human–environment relations beyond reductionist dualisms such as subject/object, nature/society and human/non-human. At the heart of the suggested trinity of actants lies the notion of ‘dynamic hybrids’ that identifies humans, other organisms and certain machines as decisive nodes between material and immaterial spaces of scientific network-building. The paper concludes by assessing how the suggested conceptual moves may affect the analysis and critique of scientific practice. It is pointed out that the proposed conceptual resources are not trying to establ...

[1]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[2]  Jonathan Murdoch,et al.  Towards a geography of heterogeneous associations , 1997 .

[3]  F. Fukuyama.  Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution , 2002 .

[4]  Derek J. de Solla Price,et al.  "Little Science, Big Science", Derek J. de Solla Price, New York-London 1963 : [recenzja] / Janusz Thor. , 1964 .

[5]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[6]  W. Zierhofer.  Grundlage für eine Humangeographie des relationalen Weltbildes. Die sozialwissenschaftliche Bedeutung von Sprachpragmatik, Ökologie und Evolution , 1997 .

[7]  M. Callon,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology : sociology of science in the real world , 1988 .

[8]  W. Zierhofer.  Geographie der Hybriden , 1999 .

[9]  B. Barnes.  Scientific knowledge and sociological theory , 1974 .

[10]  M. Harrison,et al.  The Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Rhic , 1993 .

[11]  S. Whatmore,et al.  Mapping Posthumanism: An Exchange , 2004 .

[12]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[13]  T. Barnes.  A History of Regression: Actors, Networks, Machines, and Numbers , 1998 .

[14]  N. Castree.  THE NATURE OF PRODUCED NATURE: MATERIALITY AND KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTION IN MARXISM , 1995 .

[15]  M. Serres,et al.  Angels: A Modern Myth , 1995 .

[16]  Reply to Bruno Latour. , 1999, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[17]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[18]  Science, Space and Hermeneutics. The Hettner Lectures, 2001 , 2002 .

[19]  J. Murdoch.  Inhuman/Nonhuman/Human: Actor-Network Theory and the Prospects for a Nondualistic and Symmetrical Perspective on Nature and Society , 1997 .

[20]  B. Latour.  On actor-network theory : A few clarifications , 1996 .

[21]  Sherry Turkle,et al.  The second self: computers and the human spirit , 1984 .

[22]  T. G. Jordan,et al.  The Human Mosaic: A Thematic Introduction to Cultural Geography , 1976 .

[23]  S. Turkle.  Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet , 1997 .

[24]  Dick Pels,et al.  The Politics of Symmetry , 1996 .

[25]  Diana Crane,et al.  Transnational Networks in Basic Science , 1971, International Organization.

[26]  J. Murdoch,et al.  Actor-Networks and the Evolution of Economic Forms: Combining Description and Explanation in Theories of Regulation, Flexible Specialization, and Networks , 1995 .

[27]  Grenzüberschreitende Mobilität und Kooperation in den Wissenschaften : Deutschlandaufenthalte US-amerikanischer Humboldt-Forschungspreisträger aus einer erweiterten Akteursnetzwerkperspektive , 2002 .

[28]  B. Latour.  For David Bloor...and beyond: a reply to David Bloor's Anti-Latour. , 1999, Studies in history and philosophy of science.

[29]  J. Krige.  Some Socio-Historical Aspects of Multinational Collaborations in High-Energy Physics at Cern Between 1975 and 1985 , 1993 .

[30]  W. Zierhofer.  Gesellschaft: Transformation eines Problems , 2002 .

[31]  D. Livingstone.  Putting science in its place , 2000, Nature.

[32]  H. Jons.  Foreign Banks are Branching out: Changing Geographies of Hungarian Banking, 1987–1999 , 2001 .

[33]  David Demeritt,et al.  Social theory and the reconstruction of science and geography , 1996 .

[34]  John Law,et al.  On the Methods of Long-Distance Control: Vessels, Navigation and the Portuguese Route to India , 1984 .

[35]  J. Tambling.  How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[36]  C. Westfall.  Rethinking Big Science , 2003, Isis.

[37]  D. Haraway,et al.  Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium. FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse , 1997 .

[38]  Nick Bingham,et al.  Object-Ions: From Technological Determinism towards Geographies of Relations , 1996 .

[39]  K. K. Cetina.  Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[40]  B. Latour.  Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies , 1999 .

[41]  R. Hitchings.  People, plants and performance: On actor network theory and the material pleasures of the private garden , 2003 .

[42]  Mike Crang,et al.  Virtual Geographies: Bodies, Space and Relations , 1999 .

[43]  B. Latour.  We Have Never Been Modern , 1991 .

[44]  Henri Lefebvre.  The production of space , 1992 .

[45]  Steven Shapin,et al.  Following Scientists Around , 1988 .

[46]  D. Haraway.  Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature , 1990 .

[47]  M. Callon.  Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay , 1984 .

[48]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[49]  S. Hinchliffe.  Technology, Power, and Space—The Means and Ends of Geographies of Technology , 1996 .

[50]  Nigel Thrift,et al.  Some new instructions for travellers: The geography of Bruno Latour and Michel Serres , 2000 .

[51]  R. Merton.  The Normative Structure of Science , 1973 .

[52]  Sarah Whatmore,et al.  Hybrid Geographies: Natures Cultures Spaces , 2002 .

[53]  Chris Philo,et al.  Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-animal Relations , 2000 .

[54]  D. Livingstone,et al.  The Spaces of Knowledge: Contributions towards a Historical Geography of Science , 1995 .

[55]  S. Traweek,et al.  Beamtimes and Lifetimes: The World of High Energy Physicists , 1988 .

[56]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .