Different phosphorylation states of the anaphase promoting complex in response to antimitotic drugs: A quantitative proteomic analysis

The anaphase promoting complex (APC) controls the degradation of proteins during exit from mitosis and entry into S-phase. The activity of the APC is regulated by phosphorylation during mitosis. Because the phosphorylation pattern provides insights into the complexity of regulation of the APC, we studied in detail the phosphorylation patterns at a single mitotic state of arrest generated by various antimitotic drugs. We examined the phosphorylation patterns of the APC in HeLa S3 cells after they were arrested in prometaphase with taxol, nocodazole, vincristine, or monastrol. There were 71 phosphorylation sites on nine of the APC subunits. Despite the common state of arrest, the various antimitotic drug treatments resulted in differences in the phosphorylation patterns and phosphorylation stoichiometries. The relative phosphorylation stoichiometries were determined by using a method adapted from the isotope-free quantitation of the extent of modification (iQEM). We could show that during drug arrest the phosphorylation state of the APC changes, indicating that the mitotic arrest is not a static condition. We discuss these findings in terms of the variable efficacy of antimitotic drugs in cancer chemotherapy.

[1]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Direct binding of CDC20 protein family members activates the anaphase-promoting complex in mitosis and G1. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[2]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Identification of BIME as a Subunit of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex , 1996, Science.

[3]  M. Jordan,et al.  Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs , 2004, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[4]  K. Strebhardt,et al.  Polo-like kinase 1: target and regulator of anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis. , 2006, Cancer research.

[5]  Geert J. P. L. Kops,et al.  On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[6]  J. R. Bamburg,et al.  Interaction of drugs with microtubule proteins. , 1974, Federation proceedings.

[7]  Hirofumi Tanaka,et al.  Regulation of APC Activity by Phosphorylation and Regulatory Factors , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  M. Mann,et al.  Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[9]  S. Horwitz,et al.  Mechanism of action of taxol. , 1992, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[10]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Stable isotope-free relative and absolute quantitation of protein phosphorylation stoichiometry by MS. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A. Hershko,et al.  Reversible phosphorylation controls the activity of cyclosome-associated cyclin-ubiquitin ligase. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Time-resolved Mass Spectrometry of Tyrosine Phosphorylation Sites in the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling Network Reveals Dynamic Modules*S , 2005, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[13]  Y. Protopopov,et al.  Phosphorylation of the cyclosome is required for its stimulation by Fizzy/cdc20. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[14]  S. Biggins,et al.  The Ipl1-Aurora protein kinase activates the spindle checkpoint by creating unattached kinetochores , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[15]  A. Kolman Activity of epothilones. , 2005, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[16]  R. Wolthuis,et al.  Uncoupling Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome Activity from Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Control by Deregulating Polo-Like Kinase 1 , 2005, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Mad2-Independent inhibition of APCCdc20 by the mitotic checkpoint protein BubR1. , 2001, Developmental cell.

[18]  M. Kirschner,et al.  A 20s complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B , 1995, Cell.

[19]  S. Biggins,et al.  The spindle checkpoint: tension versus attachment. , 2005, Trends in cell biology.

[20]  Hongtao Yu,et al.  Regulation of APC-Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[21]  J. Manfredi,et al.  Taxol: an antimitotic agent with a new mechanism of action. , 1984, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[22]  Sampsa Hautaniemi,et al.  Effects of HER2 overexpression on cell signaling networks governing proliferation and migration , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[23]  Andrew W. Murray,et al.  Phosphorylation by Cdc28 Activates the Cdc20-Dependent Activity of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex , 2000, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  Jan Ellenberg,et al.  Roles of Polo-like Kinase 1 in the Assembly of Functional Mitotic Spindles , 2004, Current Biology.

[25]  Karl Mechtler,et al.  Mitotic regulation of the human anaphase‐promoting complex by phosphorylation , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[26]  M. Mann,et al.  Global, In Vivo, and Site-Specific Phosphorylation Dynamics in Signaling Networks , 2006, Cell.

[27]  Jan-Michael Peters,et al.  Activation of the human anaphase-promoting complex by proteins of the CDC20/Fizzy family , 1998, Current Biology.