Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task

Active tool use in human and non-human primates has been claimed to alter the neural representations of multisensory peripersonal space. To date, most studies suggest that a short period of tool use leads to an expansion or elongation of these spatial representations, which lasts several minutes after the last tool use action. However, the possibility that multisensory interactions also change on a much shorter time scale following or preceding individual tool use movements has not yet been investigated. We measured crossmodal (visual-tactile) congruency effects as an index of multisensory integration during two tool use tasks. In the regular tool use task, the participants used one of two tools in a spatiotemporally predictable sequence after every fourth crossmodal congruency trial. In the random tool use task, the required timing and spatial location of the tool use task varied unpredictably. Multisensory integration effects increased as a function of the number of trials since tool use in the regular tool use group, but remained relatively constant in the random tool use group. The spatial distribution of these multisensory effects, however, was unaffected by tool use predictability, with significant spatial interactions found only near the hands and at the tips of the tools. These data suggest that endogenously preparing to use a tool enhances visual-tactile interactions near the tools. Such enhancements are likely due to the increased behavioural relevance of visual stimuli as each tool use action is prepared before execution.

[1]  Giuseppe di Pellegrino,et al.  Neuropsychological Evidence of an Integrated Visuotactile Representation of Peripersonal Space in Humans , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Eimer,et al.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional modulations of visual but not auditory processing , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size‐change of hand peripersonal space following tool use , 2000, Neuroreport.

[4]  Martin Eimer,et al.  Covert manual response preparation triggers attentional shifts: ERP evidence for the premotor theory of attention , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  A. Berti,et al.  When Far Becomes Near: Remapping of Space by Tool Use , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  C. Spence,et al.  Tactile selective attention and body posture: Assessing the multisensory contributions of vision and proprioception , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Silvia Bonifazi,et al.  The role played by tool-use and tool-length on the Plastic Elongation of peri-hand space: a single case study , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[8]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Self-images in the video monitor coded by monkey intraparietal neurons , 2001, Neuroscience Research.

[9]  M. Tanaka,et al.  Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. , 1996, Neuroreport.

[10]  Andrea Serino,et al.  Dynamic Size-Change of Peri-Hand Space Following Tool-Use: Determinants and Spatial Characteristics Revealed Through Cross-Modal Extinction , 2007, Cortex.

[11]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  On the nature of near space: Effects of tool use and the transition to far space , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  Atsushi Iriki,et al.  Shaping multisensory action–space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  C. Spence,et al.  Vision and touch in ageing: Crossmodal selective attention and visuotactile spatial interactions , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[14]  A Farnè,et al.  Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space through tool-use: spatial extension or shift of the multi-sensory area. , 2007, Journal of neuropsychology.

[15]  K. Zilles,et al.  Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  Tool-Use: Capturing Multisensory Spatial Attention or Extending Multisensory Peripersonal Space? , 2007, Cortex.

[17]  Francesco Pavani,et al.  Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[18]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  C. Spence,et al.  Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[20]  A. Maravita,et al.  Tools for the body (schema) , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Referral of tactile sensation to the tips of L-shaped sticks. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Jon Driver,et al.  Active Tool Use with the Contralesional Hand Can Reduce Cross-modal Extinction of Touch on that Hand , 2002, Neurocase.

[23]  C. Spence,et al.  Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[24]  Charles Spence,et al.  Temporal aspects of the visuotactile congruency effect , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  S. Obayashi,et al.  Subjective image of invisible hand coded by monkey intraparietal neurons , 2000, Neuroreport.

[26]  M. L. Demattè,et al.  Beyond the window: multisensory representation of peripersonal space across a transparent barrier. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[27]  C. Blakemore,et al.  The site of saccadic suppression , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[28]  U. Castiello,et al.  Binding personal and extrapersonal space through body shadows , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Action influences spatial perception: Neuropsychological evidence , 2004 .

[30]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  A Solution to the Effect of Sample Size on Outlier Elimination , 1994 .

[31]  Jon Driver,et al.  Neural correlates of crossmodal visual-tactile extinction and of tactile awareness revealed by fMRI in a right-hemisphere stroke patient , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Jon Driver,et al.  Reaching with a tool extends visual–tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[33]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  Widening the Sphere of Influence: Using a Tool to Extend Extrapersonal Visual Space in a Patient with Severe Neglect , 2002, Neurocase.

[34]  C. Spence,et al.  Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans , 2002, Cognition.

[35]  A. Iriki,et al.  Attention-induced neuronal activity in the monkey somatosensory cortex revealed by pupillometrics , 1996, Neuroscience Research.

[36]  C. Spence,et al.  Beyond the body schema: Visual, prosthetic, and technological contributions to bodily perception and awareness , 2006 .

[37]  M. Shiffrar,et al.  Human Body Perception From The Inside Out , 2005 .

[38]  Nicholas P. Holmes,et al.  The body schema and multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space , 2004, Cognitive Processing.

[39]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visuomotor cuing through tool use in unilateral visual neglect. , 2004, The Journal of general psychology.

[40]  David J. Turk,et al.  Placing a tool in the spotlight: spatial attention modulates visuomotor responses in cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[41]  S. Kitazawa,et al.  Sensation at the tips of invisible tools , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[43]  E. Làdavas Functional and dynamic properties of visual peripersonal space , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[44]  A Maravita,et al.  From "body in the brain" to "body in space". Sensory and intentional components of body representation , 2006 .

[45]  Dylan F. Cooke,et al.  Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  M. Costantini,et al.  Temporal dynamics of visuo-tactile extinction within and between hemispaces. , 2007, Neuropsychology.

[47]  C. Gross,et al.  Visuospatial properties of ventral premotor cortex. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  T Landis,et al.  So near yet so far: Neglect in far or near space depends on tool use , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[49]  S. Ferber,et al.  Revisiting unilateral neglect , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Ventral intraparietal area of the macaque: congruent visual and somatic response properties. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.