EPROACH: A Population Vaccination Game for Strategic Information Design to Enable Responsible COVID Reopening

The COVID-19 lockdowns have created a significant socioeconomic impact on our society. In this paper, we propose a population vaccination game framework, called EPROACH, to design policies for reopenings that guarantee post-opening public health safety. In our framework, a population of players decides whether to vaccinate or not based on the public and private information they receive. The reopening is captured by the switching of the game state. The insights obtained from our framework include the appropriate vaccination coverage threshold for safe-reopening and information-based methods to incentivize individual vaccination decisions. In particular, our framework bridges the modeling of the strategic behaviors of the populations and the spreading of infectious diseases. This integration enables finding the threshold which guarantees a disease-free epidemic steady state under the population's Nash equilibrium vaccination decisions. The equilibrium vaccination decisions depend on the information received by the agents. It makes the steady-state epidemic severity controllable through information. We find out that the externalities created by reopening lead to the coordination of the rational players in the population and result in a unique Nash equilibrium. We use numerical experiments to corroborate the results and illustrate the design of public information for responsible reopening.

[1]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Optimal Pricing in Networks with Externalities , 2011, Oper. Res..

[2]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Herd Behaviors in Epidemics: A Dynamics-Coupled Evolutionary Games Approach , 2021, Dynamic Games and Applications.

[3]  Stephen Morris,et al.  Equilibrium Selection in Global Games with Strategic Complementarities , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[4]  H. Carlsson,et al.  Global Games and Equilibrium Selection , 1993 .

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Rationalizability, Learning, and Equilibrium in Games with Strategic Complementarities , 1990 .

[6]  D. Earn,et al.  Vaccination and the theory of games. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  S. Morris,et al.  Coordination Risk and the Price of Debt , 2002 .

[8]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[9]  D. Acemoglu,et al.  Optimal adaptive testing for epidemic control: combining molecular and serology tests , 2021, ArXiv.

[10]  F. Brauer Bounds for solutions of ordinary differential equations , 1963 .

[11]  William H. Sandholm,et al.  Population Games And Evolutionary Dynamics , 2010, Economic learning and social evolution.

[12]  Timothy C. Reluga,et al.  A general approach for population games with application to vaccination. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences.

[13]  S. Morris,et al.  Global Games: Theory and Applications , 2001 .

[14]  A. Pavan,et al.  Dynamic Global Games of Regime Change: Learning, Multiplicity and Timing of Attacks , 2004 .

[15]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Game-Theoretic Frameworks for Epidemic Spreading and Human Decision-Making: A Review , 2021, Dynamic Games and Applications.

[16]  Quanyan Zhu,et al.  Optimal Curing Strategy for Competing Epidemics Spreading Over Complex Networks , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Signal and Information Processing over Networks.

[17]  Rodrigo Harrison GLOBAL GAMES WITH STRATEGIC SUBSTITUTES , 2020 .

[18]  Piet Van Mieghem,et al.  Epidemic processes in complex networks , 2014, ArXiv.

[19]  D. M. Topkis Equilibrium Points in Nonzero-Sum n-Person Submodular Games , 1979 .