The Impact of Candidate Name Order on Election Outcomes

Perceived obligations of citizen duty may compel some people to cast votes in democratic elections even when they lack sufficient information to make informed choices. Psychological theories of choice suggest that, under such circumstances, voters may be influenced by the order in which candidates' names appear on the ballot, biasing people toward candidates listed early (when voters can generate reasons to vote for the candidates) or late (when voters can only generate reasons to vote against the candidates). Consistent with this reasoning, analyses of 1992 election returns in Ohio revealed that reliable name-order effects appeared in 48 percent of 118 races, nearly always advantaging candidates listed first, by an average of 2.5 percent. These effects were stronger in races when party affiliations were not listed, when races had been minimally publicized, and when no incumbent was involved. Furthermore, name-order effects were stronger in counties where voters were less knowledgeable about politics. All of this suggests that ballot structure influences election outcomes when voters lack substantive bases for candidate preferences. However, the magnitude of name-order effects observed here suggests that they have probably done little to undermine the democratic process in contemporary America.

[1]  C. O. Matthews.  The effect of position of printed response words upon children's answers to questions in two-response types of tests. , 1927 .

[2]  L. Cronbach.  Further Evidence on Response Sets and Test Design , 1950 .

[3]  D. Gold.  A Note on the "Rationality" of Anthropologists in Voting for Officers , 1952 .

[4]  I. A. Berg,et al.  Response Bias in an Unstructured Questionnaire , 1954 .

[5]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[6]  A. Downs.  An Economic Theory of Democracy , 1957 .

[7]  H. Simon,et al.  Models of Man. , 1957 .

[8]  Ethnic and party affiliations of candidates as determinants of voting. , 1958 .

[9]  P. Converse,et al.  The American voter , 1960 .

[10]  James A. Robinson,et al.  Some Correlates of Voter Participation: The Case of Indiana , 1960, The Journal of Politics.

[11]  A. R. Ilersic,et al.  Research methods in social relations , 1961 .

[12]  C. Bagley.  DOES CANDIDATES' POSITION ON THE BALLOT PAPER INFLUENCE VOTERS' CHOICE?—A STUDY OF THE 1959 AND 1964 BRITISH GENERAL ELECTIONS , 1965 .

[13]  W. D. Burnham.  The Changing Shape of the American Political Universe , 1965, American Political Science Review.

[14]  R. Zajonc.  Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[15]  The "Donkey Vote" , 1968 .

[16]  J. Mueller,et al.  Voting on the Propositions: Ballot Patterns and Historical Trends in California , 1969, American Political Science Review.

[17]  J. Mueller,et al.  CHOOSING AMONG 133 CANDIDATES , 1970 .

[18]  Preference voting and the “donkey vote” , 1970 .

[19]  D. Byrne.  The Attraction Paradigm , 1971 .

[20]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[21]  Marilynn B. Brewer,et al.  Principles of research in social psychology , 1973 .

[22]  B. Walsh,et al.  The Importance of Positional Voting Bias in the Irish General Election of 1973 , 1974 .

[23]  The Importance of Positional Voting Bias in British Elections , 1974 .

[24]  J. Pueschel,et al.  But Who Should I Vote for County Coroner? , 1974, The Journal of Politics.

[25]  Graham J. G. Upton,et al.  Biases in Local Government Elections Due to Position on the Ballot Paper , 1974 .

[26]  Delbert A. Taebel.  The Effect of Ballot Position on Electoral Success , 1975 .

[27]  Graham J. G. Upton,et al.  The Determination of the Optimum Position on a Ballot Paper , 1975 .

[28]  Merrill Carlsmith.  Methods of research in social psychology , 1976 .

[29]  F. Sorauf.  Party politics in America , 1976 .

[30]  K. A. Coney,et al.  Order-Bias: The Special Case of Letter Preference , 1977 .

[31]  Benjamin I. Page.  Choices and echoes in Presidential elections , 1978 .

[32]  J. Pennock.  Democratic Political Theory , 1979 .

[33]  Thomas E. Mann,et al.  Candidates and Parties in Congressional Elections , 1980, American Political Science Review.

[34]  Robert Y. Shapiro,et al.  The New American Voter , 1980 .

[35]  M L Dean,et al.  Presentation order effects in product taste tests. , 1980, The Journal of psychology.

[36]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .

[37]  M. Volcansek.  An Exploration of the Judicial Election Process , 1981 .

[38]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating the effects of social interventions , 1981 .

[39]  I. McAllister,et al.  Ballot Paper Cues and the Vote in Australia and Britain: Alphabetic Voting, Sex, and Title , 1984 .

[40]  J. M. Nuttin.  Narcissism beyond Gestalt and awareness: The name letter effect , 1985 .

[41]  The initial letter effect : ego-attachment or mere exposure? / , 1986 .

[42]  R. Darcy.  Position Effects With Party Column Ballots , 1986 .

[43]  J. Klayman,et al.  Confirmation, Disconfirmation, and Informa-tion in Hypothesis Testing , 1987 .

[44]  James M. Vanderleeuw,et al.  Race, Referendums, and Roll-Off , 1987, The Journal of Politics.

[45]  Arend Lijphart,et al.  Alphabetic bias in partisan elections: Patterns of voting for the Spanish Senate, 1982 and 1986 , 1988 .

[46]  Kathleen M. McGraw,et al.  An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation , 1989, American Political Science Review.

[47]  R. Dahl,et al.  Democracy and Its Critics , 1990 .

[48]  Irving Crespi,et al.  Pre-Election Polling: Sources of Accuracy and Error , 1990 .

[49]  Ian McAllister,et al.  Ballot position effects , 1990 .

[50]  J. Zaller.  Political awareness, elite opinion leadership, and the mass survey response , 1990 .

[51]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[52]  Dennis F. Kinsey,et al.  The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns , 1993 .

[53]  J. Krosnick.  Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[54]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  A Cognitive Model of Response-Order Effects in Survey Measurement , 1992 .

[55]  T. E. Patterson.  Out Of Order , 1993 .

[56]  Steven J. Rosenstone,et al.  Mobilization, participation, and democracy in America , 1993 .

[57]  Gregory A. Strizek,et al.  Electronic Voting Machines and Ballot Roll-Off , 1995 .

[58]  S. Keeter,et al.  What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters , 1996 .

[59]  S. Kitayama,et al.  Implicit Self-Esteem in Japan: Name Letters and Birthday Numbers , 1997 .