Critical assessment of the transport of intensity equation as a phase recovery technique in optical lithography

Photomasks are expected to have phase effects near edges due to their 3D topography, which can be modeled as imaginary boundary layers in thin mask simulations. We apply a modified transport of intensity (TIE) phase imaging technique to through-focus aerial images of photomasks in order to recover polarization-dependent edge effects. We use AIMS measurements with 193nm light to study the dependence of recovered phase on mask type and geometry. The TIE is an intensity conservation equation that quantitatively relates phase in the wafer plane to intensity through-focus. Here, we develop a modified version of the TIE for strongly absorbing objects, and apply it to recover wafer plane phase of attenuating masks. The projection printer blurs the fields at the wafer plane by its point spread function, hence an effective deconvolution is used to predict the boundary layers at the mask that best approximate the measured thick mask edge effects. Computation required for the inverse problem is fast and independent of mask geometry, unlike FDTD computations.

[1]  Eli Yablonovitch,et al.  Boundary layer model to account for thick mask effects in photolithography , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  K. Nugent,et al.  Quantitative phase‐amplitude microscopy I: optical microscopy , 2002, Journal of microscopy.

[3]  K. Nugent,et al.  Rapid quantitative phase imaging using the transport of intensity equation , 1997 .

[4]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Conjugate Gradient Methods , 1999 .

[5]  K. Nugent,et al.  Quantitative Phase Imaging Using Hard X Rays. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[6]  Laura Waller,et al.  Partially Coherent Phase Recovery by Kalman Filtering , 2013 .

[7]  Laura Waller,et al.  Efficient Gaussian inference algorithms for phase imaging , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[8]  Andrew R. Neureuther,et al.  Simplified models for edge transitions in rigorous mask modeling , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[9]  M. Graef,et al.  A new symmetrized solution for phase retrieval using the transport of intensity equation. , 2002, Micron.

[10]  Derek B. Dove,et al.  Development and application of a new tool for lithographic mask evaluation, the stepper equivalent Aerial Image Measurement System, AIMS , 1997, IBM J. Res. Dev..

[11]  Lei Tian,et al.  The transport of intensity equation and partially coherent fields , 2012 .

[12]  Kazuo Ishizuka,et al.  Phase measurement of atomic resolution image using transport of intensity equation. , 2005, Journal of electron microscopy.

[13]  M. Teague Deterministic phase retrieval: a Green’s function solution , 1983 .

[14]  Leslie J. Allen,et al.  Phase retrieval from series of images obtained by defocus variation , 2001 .

[15]  G. Barbastathis,et al.  Transport-of-intensity approach to differential interference contrast (TI-DIC) microscopy for quantitative phase imaging. , 2010, Optics letters.

[16]  K. Nugent,et al.  Noninterferometric phase imaging with partially coherent light , 1998 .

[17]  L. Tian,et al.  Transport of Intensity phase-amplitude imaging with higher order intensity derivatives. , 2010, Optics express.

[18]  Laura Waller,et al.  Analysis of edge effects in attenuating phase-shift masks using quantitative phase imaging , 2013, Photomask Technology.

[19]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  Critical impact of mask electromagnetic effects on optical proximity corrections performance for 45nm and beyond , 2007 .

[20]  Marshal Miller,et al.  Mask Edge Effects in Optical Lithography and Chip Level Modeling Methods , 2010 .

[21]  Andrew R. Neureuther,et al.  Identifying And Monitoring Effects Of Lens Aberrations In Projection Printing , 1987, Advanced Lithography.