Considerations in Design of Transition Behaviors for Dynamic Thematic Maps

Maps provide a means for visual communication of spatial information. The success of this communication process largely rests on the design and symbolization choices made by the cartographer. For static mapmaking we have seen substantial research in how our design decisions can influence the legibility of the map’s message, however, we have limited knowledge about how dynamic maps communicate most effectively. Commonly, dynamic maps communicate spatiotemporal information by 1) displaying known data at discrete points in time and 2) employing cartographic transitions that depict changes that occur between these points. Since these transitions are a part of the communication process, we investigate how three common principles of static map design (visual variables, level of measurement, and classed vs. unclassed data representations) relate to cartographic transitions and their abilities to congruently and coherently represent temporal change in dynamic phenomena. In this review we find that many principles for static map design are less than reliable in a dynamic environment; the principles of static map symbolization and design do not always appear to be effective or congruent graphical representations of change. Through the review it becomes apparent that we are in need of additional research in the communication effectiveness of dynamic thematic maps. We conclude by identifying several research areas that we believe are key to developing research-based best practices for communicating about dynamic geographic processes.

[1]  Cynthia A. Brewer,et al.  Mapping Mortality: Evaluating Color Schemes for Choropleth Maps , 1997 .

[2]  Nicholas Chrisman,et al.  Rethinking Levels of Measurement for Cartography , 1998 .

[3]  Mark Harrower,et al.  Tips for Designing Effective Animated Maps , 2003 .

[4]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  VISUALIZING UNCERTAIN INFORMATION , 1992 .

[6]  Mark Harrower Visualizing Change: Using Cartographic Animation to Explore Remotely-Sensed Data , 2001 .

[7]  Amy Lobben Classification and Application of Cartographic Animation , 2003 .

[8]  Kirk Goldsberry,et al.  Issues of Change Detection in Animated Choropleth Maps , 2009, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[9]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[10]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[11]  Michael W. Dobson,et al.  PERCEPTION OF CONTINUOUSLY SHADED MAPS , 1980 .

[12]  B. Marx The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1985 .

[13]  Terry A. Slocum Thematic Cartography and Geographic Visualization , 2004 .

[14]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis A Cartographic Animation of Average Yearly Surface Temperatures for the 48 Contiguous United States: 1897-1986 , 1991 .

[15]  Michael P. Peterson,et al.  Interactive Cartographic Animation , 1993 .

[16]  Harold Modellering The computer animated film: A dynamic cartography , 1973, ACM Annual Conference.

[17]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[18]  Gennady Andrienko,et al.  Novel Method to Measure Inference Affordance in Static Small-Multiple Map Displays Representing Dynamic Processes , 2008 .

[19]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Animated Maps of Aggregate Data: Conceptual and Practical Problems , 1991 .

[20]  Harold Moellering The Real-Time Animation of Three-Dimensional Maps , 1980 .

[21]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Cognitive Map-Design Research in the Twentieth Century: Theoretical and Empirical Approaches , 2002 .

[22]  Connie A. Blok Monitoring Change: Characteristics of Dynamic Geo-spatial Phenomena for Visual Exploration , 2000, Spatial Cognition.

[23]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  Animation and the Role of Map Design in Scientific Visualization , 1992 .

[24]  J. Flannery THE RELATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF SOME COMMON GRADUATED POINT SYMBOLS IN THE PRESENTATION OF QUANTITATIVE DATA , 1971 .

[25]  Jeffrey S. Torguson,et al.  Cartography , 2019, Dictionary of Geotourism.