Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

PURPOSE To develop a computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern (MPP) measure and investigate its association with breast cancer risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS A pilot case-control study was conducted by collecting mammograms from 382 subjects retrospectively. The study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Informed consent was waived. The cases included the contralateral mammograms of cancer patients (n = 136) obtained at least 1 year before diagnosis. The controls included mammograms of healthy subjects (n = 246) who had cancer-free follow-up for at least 5 years. The data set was historically divided into a training set and an independent test set. An MPP measure was designed to analyze the texture patterns of fibroglandular tissue in the retroareolar region. Odds ratios (ORs) were used to assess the association between breast cancer risk and MPP. To test the trend in ORs, we divided the MPP measure into three categories (C1, C2, and C3) on the basis of its values from low to high, with C1 as the baseline. The confounding factors in this study included patient age, body mass index, first-degree relatives with history of breast cancer, number of previous breast biopsies, and percentage density (PD). RESULTS Among all of the subjects from the training and test data sets, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between MPP and PD was 0.13. With logistic regression to adjust the confounding, the adjusted ORs for C2 and C3 relative to C1 in the test set were 2.82 (P = .041) and 13.89 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSION The proposed MPP measure demonstrated a strong association with breast cancer risk and has the potential to serve as an independent factor for risk prediction.

[1]  Edwin Silverberg,et al.  Survival experience in the breast cancer detection demonstration project , 1987, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[2]  C. Smart,et al.  Survival advantage differences by age: Evaluation of the extended follow‐up of the breast cancer detection demonstration project , 1994, Cancer.

[3]  N. Boyd,et al.  Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  J. Otten,et al.  Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: Masking bias or causality? , 1998, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[5]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Comparison of mammographic parenchymal patterns of normal subjects and breast cancer patients , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  V. Shane Pankratz,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density as a General Marker of Breast Cancer Risk , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  Berkman Sahiner,et al.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms , 2000, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[8]  N. Petrick,et al.  Computerized nipple identification for multiple image analysis in computer-aided diagnosis. , 2004, Medical physics.

[9]  J. Wolfe Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. , 1976, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  V. McCormack,et al.  Breast Density and Parenchymal Patterns as Markers of Breast Cancer Risk: A Meta-analysis , 2006, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[11]  P. Sismondi,et al.  Beyond randomized controlled trials , 2002, Cancer.

[12]  D Spiegelman,et al.  Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention. , 2001, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  N F Boyd,et al.  Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk , 1997, Cancer.

[14]  L. Shulman,et al.  Prevention of Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women: Approaches to Estimating and Reducing Risk , 2009 .

[15]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (second of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  B Julesz,et al.  Experiments in the visual perception of texture. , 1975, Scientific American.

[17]  D. Evans,et al.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. , 2010, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[18]  S. Woolf,et al.  Breast Cancer Screening: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  B. Julesz,et al.  Visual discrimination of textures with identical third-order statistics , 1978, Biological Cybernetics.

[20]  R E Hendrick,et al.  Benefit of mammography screening in women ages 40 to 49 Years. Current evidence from randomized controlled trials , 1995, Cancer.

[21]  R L Egan,et al.  Breast cancer mammography patterns. , 1977, Cancer.

[22]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Computerized image analysis: estimation of breast density on mammograms. , 2001, Medical physics.

[23]  P. Langenberg,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  Karla Kerlikowske,et al.  The mammogram that cried Wolfe. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  Caroline Diorio,et al.  Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? , 2003, Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

[26]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories. , 2006, Radiology.

[27]  M. Yaffe,et al.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension. , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  J Whitehead,et al.  Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns. A study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller , 1985, Cancer.

[29]  L. Koran,et al.  The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments (first of two parts). , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[30]  M H Gail,et al.  Weighing the risks and benefits of tamoxifen treatment for preventing breast cancer. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.