Surveying the Effect of Media Effects A Meta‐Analytic Summary of the Media Effects Research in Human Communication Research

This is a unique investigation that is particular to the needs of this special issue of Human Communication Research (HCR). Specifically, this study analyzes the media effects research that has been published in HCR during the past 25 years via meta-analysis. Numerous significant findings point to various themes and trends regarding media research in HCR. First, age is related to processing ability, understanding, and attending to media such that as children age, they better understand media messages. Second, the mass media are a significant source of learning. Third, the media can influence attitudes, which in turn, may influence or shape behaviors. Political, social, and educational implications of the findings are discussed. In addition, directions for future research, including the use of meta-analysis as a methodological tool, are discussed, as is the social responsibility of scholars in exploring the positive effects of media as opposed to ones with potentially antisocial outcomes.

[1]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[2]  Deirdre D. Johnston.  Adolescents’ Motivations for Viewing Graphic Horror , 1995 .

[3]  Kathy Pezdek,et al.  THE EFFECT OF TELEVISION AND RADIO ON CHILDREN'S CREATIVITY , 1984 .

[4]  Speed, Space, Kids and the Television Cyclops: Viewers' Perceptions of Velocity and Distance in Televised Events. , 1981 .

[5]  Haejung Paik,et al.  The Effects of Television Violence on Antisocial Behavior: A Meta-Analysis1 , 1994 .

[6]  T. M. Harrison,et al.  An Interpersonal Communication Perspective on Images of Political Candidates. , 1988 .

[7]  B. Greenberg,et al.  Tv, Peer, and Parent Models for pro- and Antisocial Conflict Behaviors , 1980 .

[8]  J. Christiansen.  TELEVISION ROLE MODELS AND ADOLESCENT OCCUPATIONAL GOALS , 1979 .

[10]  John A. Courtright,et al.  Normative Images of Communication Media Mass and Interpersonal Channels in the New Media Environment , 1993 .

[11]  T. M. Williams.  HOW AND WHAT DO CHILDREN LEARN FROM TELEVISION , 1981 .

[12]  Mike Allen,et al.  Exposure to Pornography and Acceptance of Rape Myths , 1992 .

[13]  M. Oliver.  Exploring the Paradox of the Enjoyment of Sad Films , 1993 .

[14]  W. Potter,et al.  Cultivation Theory and Research: A Conceptual Critique. , 1993 .

[15]  Marie-Louise Mares.  The Role of Source Confusions in Television's Cultivation of Social Reality Judgments , 1996 .

[16]  J. Watt,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THREE MODELS OF TELEVISION VIEWING AND AGGRESSION , 1977 .

[17]  A. Cohen.  ATTENTION TO THE MASS MEDIA AMONG STRAIGHT AND SPLIT TICKET VOTERS: A RESEARCH NOTE , 1975 .

[18]  A. Mulac,et al.  MALE/FEMALE LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES AND ATTRIBUTIONAL CONSEQUENCES IN CHILDREN'S TELEVISION , 1985 .

[19]  Lawrence J. Mullen,et al.  Television Viewing and Public Perceptions of Attorneys , 1995 .

[20]  Esther Thorson,et al.  Children's Responses to Conflicting Auditory and Visual Features of a Televised Narrative. , 1989 .

[21]  G. Blake Armstrong,et al.  Background Television as an Inhibitor of Cognitive Processing , 1990 .

[22]  Jerome L. Singer,et al.  Family Mediation Patterns and Television Viewing: Young Children's Use and Grasp of the Medium. , 1985 .

[23]  Min-Sun Kim,et al.  Relationships Among Attitudes, Behavioral Intentions, and Behavior , 1993 .

[24]  Min-Sun Kim,et al.  Attitude-Behavior Relations: A Meta-Analysis of Attitudinal Relevance and Topic , 1993 .

[25]  C. Hoffner,et al.  Children's Emotional Reactions to a Scary Film The Role of Prior Outcome Information and Coping Style , 1997 .

[26]  E. Perse.  Involvement with Local Television News Cognitive and Emotional Dimensions , 1990 .

[27]  Carrie Heeter,et al.  PROGRAM SELECTION WITH ABUNDANCE OF CHOICE , 1985 .

[28]  D. L. Swanson,et al.  The Uses and Misuses of Uses and Gratifications , 1977 .

[29]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Symbolic Victimization and Real World Fear , 1983 .

[30]  Karen E. Campbell,et al.  Sex and Gender Differences in Personal Relationships , 1997 .

[31]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Searching for Cognitive Processes in the Cultivation Effect Adult and Adolescent Samples in the United States and Australia , 1987 .

[32]  J. Cantor,et al.  Forewarning of a Threat and Prior Knowledge of Outcome Effects on Children's Emotional Responses to a Film Sequence , 1990 .

[33]  A. Rubin,et al.  LONELINESS, PARASOCIAL INTERACTION, AND LOCAL TELEVISION NEWS VIEWING , 1985 .

[34]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  The implicit representation of characters in Dallas. A multidimensional scaling approach , 1987 .

[35]  M. Burt.  Cultural myths and supports for rape. , 1980, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[36]  E. Donnerstein,et al.  Physiological Desensitization and Judgments About Female Victims of Violence , 1989 .

[37]  A. Rubin.  TELEVISION USE BY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS , 1979 .

[38]  G. Salomon,et al.  On the Meaning and Validity of Television Viewing. , 1978 .

[39]  R. Abelman.  From Here to Eternity Children's Acquisition of Understanding of Projective Size on Television , 1989 .

[40]  Linda F. Alwitt,et al.  Preschool Children's Visual Attention to Attributes of Television , 1980 .

[41]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  The Effect of Positioning a Message within Differentially Cognitively Involving Portions of a Television Segment on Recall of the Message , 1978 .

[42]  Seth Geiger,et al.  We Interrupt This Program. Attention for Television Sequences , 1993 .

[43]  George A. Barnett,et al.  Campaign Communication and Attitude Change: A Multidimensional Analysis. , 1976 .

[44]  R. Hawkins,et al.  Implications of Concurrent Measures of Viewer Behavior , 1991 .

[45]  B. Reeves,et al.  THE DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE OF CHILDREN'S PERCEPTIONS OF TELEVISION CHARACTERS: A REPLICATION , 1979 .

[46]  B. Reeves,et al.  Children’s Perceptions of Television Characters , 1977 .

[47]  Paul Messaris,et al.  On the Consequences of Television-Related Parent-Child Interaction , 1981 .

[48]  M. Allen,et al.  The role of educational briefings in mitigating effects of experimental exposure to violent sexually explicit material: A meta-analysis. , 1996 .

[49]  A. Cohen,et al.  ADOLESCENTS' PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL CONFLICTS IN TELEVISION NEWS AND SOCIAL REALITY , 1983 .

[50]  R. Lind.  Ethical sensitivity in viewer evaluations of a TV news investigative report , 1997 .

[51]  A. Rubin,et al.  Audience Activity and Soap Opera Involvement: A Uses and Effects Investigation. , 1987 .

[52]  Charles Pavitt,et al.  Implicit Theories of Marriage and Evaluations of Marriage on Television , 1990 .

[53]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  SELECTING CRIME DRAMA AND APPREHENSION ABOUT CRIME , 1983 .

[54]  W. Potter.  The Linearity Assumption in Cultivation Research , 1991 .

[55]  E. Rogers,et al.  Interpersonal Versus Mass Media Communication A False Dichotomy , 1988 .

[56]  Richard A. Joslyn.  THE IMPACT OF CAMPAIGN SPOT ADVERTISING ON VOTING DEFECTIONS , 1981 .

[57]  B. Reeves,et al.  CHILDREN'S PERSON PERCEPTION: THE GENERALIZATION FROM TELEVISION PEOPLE TO REAL PEOPLE , 1982 .

[58]  J. Bryant,et al.  FACTORS INVOLVED IN GENERATING SUSPENSE , 1982 .

[59]  W. James Potter,et al.  Does Television Viewing Hinder Academic Achievement Among Adolescents , 1987 .

[60]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  UNIFORM MESSAGES AND HABITUAL VIEWING: UNNECESSARY ASSUMPTIONS IN SOCIAL REALITY EFFECTS , 1981 .

[61]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Fragmentation in the Field—and the Movement Toward Integration in Communication Science , 1988 .

[62]  Elizabeth Pugzles Lorch,et al.  Program Context, Sensation Seeking, and Attention to Televised Anti-Drug Public Service Announcements , 1994 .

[63]  Robert L. Bangert-Drowns,et al.  Review of developments in meta-analytic method. , 1986 .

[64]  A. Rubin,et al.  CONTEXTUAL AGE AND TELEVISION USE , 1982 .

[65]  T. M. Harrison,et al.  Images Versus Issues in the 1984 Presidential Election Differences Between Men and Women , 1991 .

[66]  J. Flora,et al.  Health campaign channels: tradeoffs among reach, specificity, and impact. , 1998, Human communication research.

[67]  M. M. Spirek,et al.  Individual Differences in Coping with Stressful Mass Media An Activation-Arousal View , 1988 .

[68]  C. M. Koolstra,et al.  Longitudinal Effects of Television on Children''s Leisure-time Reading , 1996 .

[69]  Barbara J. Wilson.  Reducing Children's Emotional Reactions to Mass Media Through Rehearsed Explanationand Exposure to a Replica of a Fear Object , 1987 .

[70]  J. Bryant,et al.  CHILDREN'S IMITATION OF A RIDICULED MODEL , 1983 .

[71]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Processes and Effects in the Construction of Social Reality , 1993 .

[72]  T. Grimes,et al.  Mild auditory-visual dissonance in television news may exceed viewer attentional capacity , 1991 .

[73]  B. Reeves,et al.  Emotional Television Scenes and Hemispheric Specialization. , 1989 .

[74]  M. McCombs,et al.  THE ROLE OF THE PRESS IN DETERMINING VOTER REACTIONS TO PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARIES1 , 1978 .

[75]  Barbara J. Wilson,et al.  The Impact of Social Issue Television Programming on Attitudes Toward Rape , 1992 .

[76]  Ron Tamborini,et al.  Preference for Graphic Horror Featuring Male versus Female Victimization: Personality and Past Film Viewing Experiences. , 1987 .

[77]  Barbara J. Wilson,et al.  Prior Exposure to Creatures From a Horror Film Live Versus Photographic Representations , 1993 .

[78]  S. Chaffee,et al.  Measurement and Effects of Attention to Media News , 1986 .

[79]  B. Reeves,et al.  Television's Influence on Children's Encoding of Person Information. , 1983 .

[80]  L. J. Shrum,et al.  Psychological Processes Underlying Cultivation Effects Further Tests of Construct Accessibility , 1996 .

[81]  Stephen R. Acker,et al.  Children's Perceptions of Changes in Size of Televised Images , 1981 .

[82]  James H. Watt,et al.  Visual Complexity and Young Children's Learning from Television. , 1982 .

[83]  Mike Allen,et al.  A Meta-Analysis Summarizing the Effects of Pornography II Aggression After Exposure , 1995 .

[84]  B. Debuono,et al.  Sexual behavior of college women in 1975, 1986, and 1989. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[85]  L. Shrum.  The Role of Source Confusion in Cultivation Effects May Depend on Processing Strategy A Comment on Mares (1996) , 1997 .

[86]  Michael Pfau,et al.  INOCULATION IN POLITICAL CAMPAIGN COMMUNICATION. , 1988 .

[87]  James Lull,et al.  A RULES APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF TELEVISION AND SOCIETY , 1982 .

[88]  Jian-hua Zhu,et al.  Do Televised Debates Affect Image Perception More Than Issue Knowledge?A Study of the First 1992 Presidential Debate , 1994 .

[89]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The Bridging Role of Television in Immigrant Political Socialization , 1990 .

[90]  J. Lull.  THE SOCIAL USES OF TELEVISION , 1980 .

[91]  G. Sparks.  The Relationship Between Distress and Delight in Males’ and Females’ Reactions to Frightening Films , 1991 .

[92]  Thomas A. McCain,et al.  Cognitive Switching: A Behavioral Trace of Human Information Processing for Television Newscasts. , 1979 .

[93]  Carolyn A. Lin.  Modeling the Gratification‐Seeking Process of Television Viewing , 1993 .

[94]  L. Donohew,et al.  Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. , 1998, Human communication research.