Automatic habitat classification methods based on satellite images: a practical assessment in the NW Iberia coastal mountains.

Although remote sensing is increasingly in use for habitat mapping, traditional image classification methods tend to suffer shortcomings due to non-normality of spectral signatures, as well as overlapping and heterogeneity in radiometric responses of natural and semi natural vegetation. Methods using non-parametric classifiers and object-oriented analysis have been suggested as possible solutions for overcoming these limitations. In this paper, we aimed at evaluating the performance of some of these techniques for the European Natura 2000 network of protected areas habitats mapping. For this purpose, we tested different methods of supervised image classification in the Northern Mountains of Galicia, Spain, an area included in the Natura 2000 network, which is characterized by a highly heterogeneous landscape. Methods involved the use of maximum likelihood and nearest neighbour decision rules in per-pixel and per-object classification analyses on Landsat TM imagery. Per-object classifications were completed using the segment mean and segment means plus standard deviation feature spaces. The results showed the existence of significant differences in the accuracies for the different methodologies, their strengths and weaknesses and identified the most adequate approach for habitat mapping. Analyses pointed out that significant improvements in accuracy were achieved only under certain combinations of per-object analysis, non-parametric classifiers and high dimensionality feature space.

[1]  Edward J. Milton,et al.  Remote sensing of structurally complex semi-natural vegetation— an example from heathland , 1987 .

[2]  E. Salinero Teledetección ambiental: la observación de la Tierra desde el espacio , 2002 .

[3]  Rafael Crecente-Maseda,et al.  Directions of Change in Land Cover and Landscape Patterns from 1957 to 2000 in Agricultural Landscapes in NW Spain , 2006, Environmental management.

[4]  R. W. Tomlinson,et al.  Application of CORINE Land Cover Methodology to the U.K.-Some Issues Raised from Northern Ireland , 1996 .

[5]  Stephen E. Fienberg,et al.  Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice , 1976 .

[6]  Danny Vandenbroucke,et al.  Land Cover and Land Use in the NATURA 2000 network using LUCAS data , 2002 .

[7]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Spatial indicators for nature conservation from European to local scale , 2005 .

[8]  Mª Virtudes Pardo Gómez Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , 2008 .

[9]  Graeme G. Wilkinson,et al.  Results and implications of a study of fifteen years of satellite image classification experiments , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Non - parametric test of overlap in multispectral classification , 1988 .

[11]  Agustin Lobo,et al.  Image segmentation and discriminant analysis for the identification of land cover units in ecology , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[12]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Fuzzy modelling of vegetation from remotely sensed imagery , 1996 .

[13]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Spectral discrimination of vegetation types in a coastal wetland , 2003 .

[14]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Basic probability sampling designs for thematic map accuracy assessment , 1999 .

[15]  P. Treitz,et al.  Image classification of a northern peatland complex using spectral and plant community data , 2003 .

[16]  T. T. Macan,et al.  Biogeographie et Ecologie , 1981 .

[17]  Robin Fuller,et al.  The Use of Classified Landsat-5 Thematic Mapper Imagery in the Characterization of Landscape Composition: a Case Study in Northern England , 1994 .

[18]  R. Leemans,et al.  Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic , 1992 .

[19]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Mapping Chaparral in the Santa Monica Mountains Using Multiple Endmember Spectral Mixture Models , 1998 .

[20]  R. Elias,et al.  Vegetation mapping and nature conservation: a case study in Terceira Island (Azores) , 2004, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[21]  Joseph Tzanopoulos,et al.  Integrated futures for Europe’s mountain regions: Reconciling biodiversity conservation and human livelihoods , 2006 .

[22]  Josef Strobl,et al.  What’s wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS , 2001 .

[23]  A. Lobo,et al.  Classification of Mediterranean crops with multisensor data: per-pixel versus per-object statistics and image segmentation , 1996 .

[24]  F. J. Cortijo,et al.  A comparative study of some non-parametric spectral classifiers. Applications to problems with high-overlapping training sets , 1997 .

[25]  Manfred Ehlers,et al.  Remote Sensing for Environmental Monitoring, GIS Applications, and Geology VII , 2004 .

[26]  Robert D. Tortora,et al.  A Note on Sample Size Estimation for Multinomial Populations , 1978 .

[27]  Line Rochefort,et al.  From Satellite Imagery to Peatland Vegetation Diversity: How Reliable Are Habitat Maps? , 2002 .

[28]  David C. Howard,et al.  The extent and condition of heather on moorland in the uplands of England and Wales , 1995 .

[29]  A. Rango,et al.  Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico , 2004 .

[30]  J. Baudry,et al.  Hedgerows: An international perspective on their origin, function and management , 2000 .

[31]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[32]  Javier Gallego Jrc Comparing CORINE Land Cover with a more detailed database in Arezzo (Italy). , 2000 .

[33]  A. C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Improved landsat-based forest mapping in steep mountainous terrain , 2003 .

[34]  Michael Bock,et al.  Remote sensing and GIS-based techniques for the classification and monitoring of biotopes: Case examples for a wet grass- and moor land area in Northern Germany , 2003 .

[35]  Godela Rossner,et al.  Mapping and indicator approaches for the assessment of habitats at different scales using remote sensing and GIS methods , 2004 .

[36]  L. Pedroni,et al.  Improved classification of Landsat Thematic Mapper data using modified prior probabilities in large and complex landscapes , 2003 .

[37]  C. V. D. Sande,et al.  A segmentation and classification approach of IKONOS-2 imagery for land cover mapping to assist flood risk and flood damage assessment , 2003 .

[38]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Multiscale image analysis for ecological monitoring of heterogeneous, small structured landscapes , 2002, Remote Sensing.

[39]  R. E. Stoneman,et al.  The Scottish raised bog land cover survey. , 1997 .

[40]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Agricultural Abandonment in the North Eastern Iberian Peninsula: The Use of Basic Landscape Metrics to Support Planning , 2005 .

[41]  Q. Mcnemar Note on the sampling error of the difference between correlated proportions or percentages , 1947, Psychometrika.

[42]  Jacob Cohen A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[43]  Godela Rossner,et al.  Selection and application of spatial indicators for nature conservation at different institutional levels , 2005 .

[44]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  A comparison of three image-object methods for the multiscale analysis of landscape structure , 2003 .

[45]  Abel Bouhier,et al.  La Galice : essai géographique d'analyse et d'interpretation d'un vieux complexe agraire , 1979 .

[46]  S. Franklin,et al.  Caribou habitat mapping and fragmentation analysis using Landsat MSS, TM, and GIS data in the North Columbia Mountains, British Columbia, Canada , 2001 .

[47]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[48]  Richard P. Armitage,et al.  Identification of the spectral characteristics of British semi-natural upland vegetation using direct ordination: a case study from Dartmoor, UK , 2004 .

[49]  A. R. Sibbald,et al.  The integration of a satellite spectral analysis into a heather moorland management model (HMMM): The case of Moidach More, northeast Scotland, U.K. , 1997 .

[50]  S. Egan,et al.  Characterisation of Calluna vulgaris dominant moorland using remote sensing with Landsat TM , 2001 .

[51]  P. Hardin Parametric and nearest-neighbor methods for hybrid classification: a comparison of pixel assignment accuracy , 1994 .

[52]  Josef Cihlar,et al.  CARIBOU HABITAT MAPPING IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF KEEWATIN, N.W.T.: AN APPLICATION OF DIGITAL LANDSAT DATA , 1980 .

[53]  Ben Gorte,et al.  A method for object-oriented land cover classification combining Landsat TM data and aerial photographs , 2003 .

[54]  J. Wickham,et al.  Effects of landscape characteristics on land-cover class accuracy , 2003 .

[55]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis , 2003 .

[56]  Robert A. Schowengerdt,et al.  A detailed comparison of backpropagation neural network and maximum-likelihood classifiers for urban land use classification , 1995, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[57]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[58]  Manuel Rodríguez Guitián Aplicación de criterios botánicos para a proposta de modelos de xestión sustentable das masas arborizadas autóctonas do subsector galaico-asturiano septentrional , 2004 .

[59]  Conghe Song,et al.  Monitoring forest succession with multitemporal Landsat images: factors of uncertainty , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[60]  Mark Cutler,et al.  Remote sensing of upland vegetation: the potential of high spatial resolution satellite sensors , 2004 .

[61]  Luis Cayuela,et al.  Classification of a complex landscape using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence , 2006 .

[62]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Mapping a specific class for priority habitats monitoring from satellite sensor data , 2006 .

[63]  I. S. Zonneveld Observation Means and Platforms , 1988 .

[64]  A. Gibon,et al.  Agricultural abandonment in mountain areas of Europe: Environmental consequences and policy response , 2000 .

[65]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification , 1973 .

[66]  P. Ramil‐Rego,et al.  Palynological data on major Holocene climatic events in NW Iberia , 2005 .

[67]  Jose L. Casanova,et al.  Land use mapping methodology using remote sensing for the regional planning directives in Segovia, Spain , 2003 .

[68]  A. Palo,et al.  Methodological problems of compiling digital vegetation site types maps: case of Saare County, Estonia , 2003 .

[69]  R. Feise Do multiple outcome measures require p-value adjustment? , 2002, BMC medical research methodology.

[70]  M. Narasimha Murty,et al.  Overlap pattern synthesis with an efficient nearest neighbor classifier , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[71]  S. Running,et al.  What does Remote Sensing Do for Ecology , 1991 .

[72]  C. Burnett,et al.  A multi-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis , 2003 .

[73]  A. Skidmore,et al.  Comparing accuracy assessments to infer superiority of image classification methods , 2006 .

[74]  Nigel M. Trodd Analysis and Representation of Heathland Vegetation from Near-Ground Level Remotely-Sensed Data , 1996 .

[75]  Ruth Weaver Spectral separation of moorland vegetation in airborne Thematic Mapper data , 1987 .

[76]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Adaptive Control Processes: A Guided Tour , 1961, The Mathematical Gazette.

[77]  T. M. Lillesand,et al.  Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation , 1980 .

[78]  R. Bunce,et al.  Heather in England and Wales , 1989 .

[79]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification , 2003 .

[80]  M. Bock,et al.  Object-oriented methods for habitat mapping at multiple scales – Case studies from Northern Germany and Wye Downs, UK , 2005 .

[81]  Stacy L. Ozesmi,et al.  Satellite remote sensing of wetlands , 2002, Wetlands Ecology and Management.

[82]  John H. Powell,et al.  What status for the Quaternary? , 2005 .

[83]  William A. Rodrigues,et al.  Departamento de Botânica , 1981 .

[84]  S. Levin The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[85]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Statistical Rigor and Practical Utility in Thematic Map Accuracy Assessment , 2001 .

[86]  G. Hay,et al.  An automated object-based approach for the multiscale image segmentation of forest scenes , 2005 .

[87]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  An Object-based Methodology for Mapping Mires Using High Resolution Imagery , 2003 .

[88]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , 1997 .

[89]  D. Robertson,et al.  Estimation of heather biomass using ground based methods for the calibration of remotely sensed data. , 2000 .

[90]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data , 1991 .

[91]  U. Benz,et al.  Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information , 2004 .

[92]  G. Hay,et al.  Remote Sensing Contributions to the Scale Issue , 1999 .

[93]  Daniel N. M. Donoghue,et al.  Development of an integrated geographical information system prototype for coastal habitat monitoring , 2002 .

[94]  T. Pavlenko On feature selection, curse-of-dimensionality and error probability in discriminant analysis , 2003 .

[95]  Laurence Hubert-Moy,et al.  A Comparison of Parametric Classification Procedures of Remotely Sensed Data Applied on Different Landscape Units , 2001 .

[96]  J. Imbernon,et al.  Characterization of landscape patterns of deforestation in tropical rain forests , 2001 .

[97]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[98]  G. Foody A fuzzy sets approach to the representation of vegetation continua from remotely sensed data : an example from lowland health , 1992 .

[99]  Maxim Shoshany,et al.  Landscape fragmentation and soil cover changes on south- and north-facing slopes during ecosystems recovery: an analysis from multi-date air photographs , 2002 .