Fuzzy logic-based tumor-marker profiles improved sensitivity in the diagnosis of lung cancer

AbstractBackground. The aim of this study was to improve the diagnostic efficiency of tumor markers in the diagnosis of lung cancer, by the mathematical evaluation of a tumor marker profile employing fuzzy logic modelling. Methods. A panel of four tumor markers, i.e., carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 antibody (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma-related antigen (SCC) and, additionally, C-reactive protein (CRP), was measured in 175 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients with different histological types and stages. Results were compared with those in 120 control subjects, including 27 with chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD), 65 with pneumoconiosis, and 11 persons with acute inflammatory lung diseases. A classificator was developed using a fuzzy-logic rule-based system. Results. Application of the fuzzy-logic rule-based system to the tumor marker values of CYFRA 21-1, NSE, and CRP yielded an increase in sensitivity of approximately 20%, i.e., 92%, compared with that of the best single marker, CYFRA 21-1 (sensitivity, 72%). The corresponding specificity was 95%. The fuzzy classificator significantly improved the sensitivity of the tumor marker panel in stages I and IIIa for non-small-cell lung cancer, as well as in “limited disease” status for small-cell lung cancer. Also, the diagnosis of other stages of lung cancer was enhanced. Conclusion. Fuzzy-logic analysis was proven to be more powerful than the measurement of single markers alone or combinations using multiple logistic regression analysis of all markers. Therefore, fuzzy logic offers a promising diagnostic tool to improve tumor marker efficiency.

[1]  M H Gail,et al.  Multiple markers for lung cancer diagnosis: validation of models for advanced lung cancer. , 1986, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[2]  R. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple markers for lung cancer diagnosis: validation of models for localized lung cancer. , 1988, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[3]  Hans-Jürgen Zimmermann,et al.  Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications , 1985 .

[4]  U. Schmitt,et al.  Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (ProGRP) - ein neuer Tumormarker beim kleinzelligen Bronchialkarzinom. Pro-Gastrin-Releasing Peptide (ProGRP) - A New Marker in Small-Cell Lung Carcinomas , 1997 .

[5]  K. Eguchi,et al.  Preliminary evaluation of the new tumor marker, CYFRA 21-1, in lung cancer patients. , 1994, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[6]  M. Plebani,et al.  Clinical evaluation of seven tumour markers in lung cancer diagnosis: can any combination improve the results? , 1995, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  B. Beghé,et al.  Evaluation of the serum markers CEA, NSE, TPS and CYFRA 21.1 in lung cancer , 1995, The International journal of biological markers.

[8]  Thomas Löser,et al.  Tumour markers in the diagnosis of bronchial carcinoma: new options using fuzzy logic-based tumour marker profiles , 1998, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[9]  J. C. Lee,et al.  Adenoma‐carcinoma sequence: A reappraisal with immunohistochemical expression of ferritin , 1995, Journal of surgical oncology.

[10]  C. Mountain,et al.  Revisions in the International System for Staging Lung Cancer. , 1997, Chest.

[11]  Steffen F. Bocklisch,et al.  Fuzzy Pattern Classification — Methodology and Application — , 1994 .

[12]  N. Kohno,et al.  Comparative studies of CAM 123-6 and carcinoembryonic antigen for the serological detection of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. , 1997, Cancer detection and prevention.

[13]  J. Watine Laboratory Variables as Additional Staging Parameters in Patients with Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma. A Systematic Review , 1999, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[14]  R. Molina,et al.  Cyfra 21–1 in Lung Cancer: Comparison with Cea, Ca 125, Scc and Nse Serum Levels , 1994, The International journal of biological markers.

[15]  H. Dienemann,et al.  Comparison of Cytokeratin Fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA) and Tissue Polypeptide Specific Antigen (TPS) as Tumour Markers in Lung Cancer , 1993, European journal of clinical chemistry and clinical biochemistry : journal of the Forum of European Clinical Chemistry Societies.

[16]  Gleb Beliakov,et al.  Fuzzy gating and the problem of screening , 1996, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[17]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[18]  P. Knekt,et al.  Serum tumor markers CEA, CA 50, TATI, and NSE in lung cancer screening , 1993, Cancer.

[19]  L. Sobin,et al.  TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours , 1987, UICC International Union Against Cancer.

[20]  F. Donato,et al.  Clinical significance of a multiple biomarker assay in patients with lung cancer. A study with logistic regression analysis. , 1990, Chest.

[21]  P. Drings,et al.  Monitoring of therapy in inoperable lung cancer patients by measurement of CYFRA 21-1, TPA- TP CEA, and NSE. , 1997, Anticancer research.

[22]  J. Watine,et al.  Faut-il suivre les sociétés savantes de pneumologie dans leurs recommandations concernant l'utilisation des marqueurs tumoraux sériques pour l'évaluation pronostique des cancers bronchiques primitifs non à petites cellules ? , 1999 .