Enhanced intracellular delivery and antibacterial efficacy of enrofloxacin-loaded docosanoic acid solid lipid nanoparticles against intracellular Salmonella

Enrofloxacin-loaded docosanoic acid solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) with different physicochemical properties were developed to enhance activity against intracellular Salmonella. Their cellular uptake, intracellular elimination and antibacterial activity were studied in RAW 264.7 cells. During the experimental period, SLN-encapsulated enrofloxacin accumulated in the cells approximately 27.06–37.71 times more efficiently than free drugs at the same extracellular concentration. After incubation for 0.5 h, the intracellular enrofloxacin was enhanced from 0.336 to 1.147 μg/mg of protein as the sizes of nanoparticles were increased from 150 to 605 nm, and from 0.960 to 1.147 μg/mg of protein when the charge was improved from −8.1 to −24.9 mv. The cellular uptake was more significantly influenced by the size than it was by the charge, and was not affected by whether the charge was positive or negative. The elimination of optimal SLN-encapsulated enrofloxacin from the cells was significantly slower than that of free enrofloxacin after removing extracellular drug. The inhibition effect against intracellular Salmonella CVCC541 of 0.24 and 0.06 μg/mL encapsulated enrofloxacin was stronger than 0.6 μg/mL free drug after all of the incubation periods and at 48 h, respectively. Docosanoic acid SLNs are thus considered as a promising carrier for intracellular bacterial treatment.

[1]  J. M. Lanao,et al.  Delivery systems to increase the selectivity of antibiotics in phagocytic cells. , 2008, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[2]  K. Kisich,et al.  Encapsulation of moxifloxacin within poly(butyl cyanoacrylate) nanoparticles enhances efficacy against intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 2007, International journal of pharmaceutics.

[3]  F. Bonini,et al.  Ciprofloxacin-loaded polyisobutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles: pharmacokinetics and in vitro antimicrobial activity , 1998 .

[4]  M. Çorlu,et al.  Determination of intracellular concentrations of free and two types of liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin in anatolian shepherd dog monocytes. , 2002, Journal of veterinary medicine. B, Infectious diseases and veterinary public health.

[5]  A. Pardakhty,et al.  Ciprofloxacin nano-niosomes for targeting intracellular infections: an in vitro evaluation , 2013, Journal of Nanoparticle Research.

[6]  D. Chakravortty,et al.  Visiting the cell biology of Salmonella infection. , 2010, Microbes and infection.

[7]  Yanfei Tao,et al.  Biodegradable nanoparticles for intracellular delivery of antimicrobial agents. , 2014, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[8]  Y. Oh,et al.  Formulation and efficacy of liposome-encapsulated antibiotics for therapy of intracellular Mycobacterium avium infection , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[9]  T. Seki,et al.  Influence of particle size on drug delivery to rat alveolar macrophages following pulmonary administration of ciprofloxacin incorporated into liposomes , 2006, Journal of drug targeting.

[10]  A. L. Baş,et al.  Efficacies of free and liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin (Baytril®) against Staphylococcus aureus infection in Turkish Shepherd Dog neutrophils in vitro , 2000 .

[11]  R. Schwendener,et al.  The effects of charge and size on the interaction of unilamellar liposomes with macrophages. , 1984, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[12]  T. Seki,et al.  Uptake characteristics of liposomes by rat alveolar macrophages: influence of particle size and surface mannose modification , 2007, The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology.

[13]  A. Rigotti,et al.  The Class B Scavenger Receptors SR-BI and CD36 Are Receptors for Anionic Phospholipids (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Y Ikada,et al.  Effect of the size and surface charge of polymer microspheres on their phagocytosis by macrophage. , 1988, Biomaterials.

[15]  M. Tobin-D'Angelo,et al.  Estimates of enteric illness attributable to contact with animals and their environments in the United States. , 2012, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[16]  D. Boothe,et al.  Time course of enrofloxacin and its active metabolite in peripheral leukocytes of dogs. , 2001, Veterinary therapeutics : research in applied veterinary medicine.

[17]  Samuel I. Miller,et al.  Salmonellae interplay with host cells , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[18]  M. Woodward,et al.  Effect of a 5 day enrofloxacin treatment on Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium DT104 in the pig. , 2004, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[19]  P. Couvreur,et al.  Nanocarriers’ entry into the cell: relevance to drug delivery , 2009, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[20]  S. Bosch,et al.  Salmonellosis and Meat Purchased at Live-Bird and Animal-Slaughter Markets, United States, 2007–2012 , 2014, Emerging infectious diseases.

[21]  T. Niewold,et al.  Effects of Enrofloxacin on Porcine Phagocytic Function , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[22]  A. L. Baş,et al.  Efficacies of liposome-encapsulated enrofloxacin against Staphylococcus aureus infection in Anatolian shepherd dog monocytes in vitro. , 2005, DTW. Deutsche tierarztliche Wochenschrift.

[23]  Z. Değim,et al.  The use of liposomal enrofloxacin for intracellular infections in Kangal dogs and visualization of phagocytosis of liposomes. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[24]  Wenzhong Zhou,et al.  Preparation, characterization and pharmacokinetics of enrofloxacin-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: influences of fatty acids. , 2011, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[25]  S. Ferrari,et al.  Author contributions , 2021 .