An Empirical Study of the Scientific Styles of Marketing Academics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Roger L. M. Dunbar,et al. The Effects of Personality Type on Choices Made in Strategic Decision Situations , 1991 .
[2] D. McKee. A Cognitive Style Framework for Marketing Education Program Development , 1991 .
[3] M. Mccaulley,et al. The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: A Measure for Individuals and Groups , 1990 .
[4] Stephen A. Stumpf,et al. COGNITIVE TRAILS IN STRATEGIC DECISION‐MAKING: LINKING THEORIES OF PERSONALITIES AND COGNITIONS* , 1989 .
[5] Edwin A. Locke,et al. Resolving scientific disputes by the joint design of crucial experiments by the antagonists: Application to the Erez–Latham dispute regarding participation in goal setting. , 1988 .
[6] Stephen A. Stumpf,et al. THE EFFECT OF MANAGEMENT STYLES ON STRATEGIC PLANNING , 1987 .
[7] Elizabeth C. Hirschman,et al. Multiple Orientations for the Conduct of Marketing Research: An Analysis of the Academic/Practitioner Distinction , 1986 .
[8] E. Hirschman. Scientific Style and the Conduct of Consumer Research , 1985 .
[9] Arkalgud Ramaprasad,et al. On formulating strategic problems , 1984 .
[10] O C Tzeng,et al. Item validity of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.
[11] Jerry C. Olson,et al. Is Science Marketing? , 1983 .
[12] S. Hunt,et al. The Macromarketing/Micromarketing Dichotomy: A Taxonomical Model , 1982 .
[13] Daniel Robey,et al. Minds and Managers: On the Dual Nature Of Human Information Processing And Management , 1981 .
[14] Michael Pollak. Paul F. Lazarsfeld: A Sociointellectual Biography , 1980 .
[15] H. H. Kassarjian. Personality and Consumer Behavior: A Review , 1971 .