A graph-theoretical basis of stochastic-cascading network influence: Characterizations of influence-based centrality

Abstract Ker-I Ko (葛可一, 1950-2018) made multiple pioneering and milestone contributions to structural complexity theory and real-number computation. His sharp perception of both discrete and continuous structures had led him to study fundamental concepts from one-way functions [29] , to polynomial-time hierarchy [21] , from integral equations [24] , to real functions [28] , from fractals [27] to fixed-points [25] , from optimization [20] to relativization [22] , from instance complexity [36] to real complexity [28] , from NP-completeness [31] to exponential-time completeness [23] . In his final two years, he turned his focus to game-theoretical designs for dynamic processes over social networks [12] , [33] . For this honorary special issue in memory of Professor Ker-I Ko, we are pleased to be able to contribute a paper with scope intersecting the areas that drew his last attention, and with results connecting discrete and continuous formulations of network dynamics. We prove that the complex stochastic network-influence processes have a simple graph-theoretical basis: Every stochastic-cascading influence profile can be written as a linear combination of breadth-first-search-based broadcast-propagations over layered-graphs. This graph-theoretical basis of stochastic network influence provides us with a systematic framework for studying the following fundamental question in network analysis: How should one assess the centralities of nodes in an information/influence propagation process over a social network? Our framework systematically extends a family of classical graph-theoretical centrality formulations — including degree centrality, harmonic centrality, and various notions of “sphere-of-influence” — to influence-based network centralities. Given that group cooperation is essential in social influences, we further extend natural group centralities from graph models to influence models, enabling us to assess individuals' centralities in group influence settings by applying the fundamental concept of Shapley value from cooperative game theory. Mathematically, using the property that these centrality formulations are Bayesian, 3 we prove an axiomatic characterization theorem: Every influence-based centrality formulation in this family is the unique Bayesian centrality that conforms with its corresponding graph-theoretical centrality. Moreover, the uniqueness is fully determined by the centrality formulation on the class of layered graphs, which is derived from a beautiful algebraic structure of influence instances modeled by cascading sequences. We further provide an algorithmic framework for efficient approximation of these influence-based centrality measures. Our study provides us with a systematic road map for comparative analyses of different influence-based centrality formulations. The fact that layered graphs form a basis for the space of influence-cascading-sequence profiles could also be useful in other studies of network influences.

[1]  Shishir Bharathi,et al.  Competitive Influence Maximization in Social Networks , 2007, WINE.

[2]  Ding-Zhu Du,et al.  A note on one-way functions and polynomial-time isomorphisms , 1986, STOC '86.

[3]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  On Circuit-Size Complexity and the Low Hierarchy in NP , 1985, SIAM J. Comput..

[4]  Jon Kleinberg,et al.  Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network , 2003, KDD '03.

[5]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for prevalent viral marketing in large-scale social networks , 2010, KDD.

[6]  Ding-Zhu Du,et al.  On the Parameterized Complexity of Pooling Design , 2009, J. Comput. Biol..

[7]  Ker-I Ko Relativized polynomial time hierarchies having exactly K levels , 1988, STOC '88.

[8]  Xiaokui Xiao,et al.  Influence maximization: near-optimal time complexity meets practical efficiency , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[9]  Osamu Watanabe,et al.  Instance complexity , 1994, JACM.

[10]  Ker-I Ko Computational Complexity of Fixed Points and Intersection Points , 1995, J. Complex..

[11]  Andreas Krause,et al.  Cost-effective outbreak detection in networks , 2007, KDD '07.

[12]  Wenjing Liu,et al.  Competitive profit maximization in social networks , 2017, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  A Polynomial-Time Computable Curve whose Interior has a Nonrecursive Measure , 1995, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[14]  Wei Chen,et al.  Scalable influence maximization for independent cascade model in large-scale social networks , 2012, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[15]  Ker-I Ko On the Computability of Fractal Dimensions and Hausdorff Measure , 1998, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[16]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining knowledge-sharing sites for viral marketing , 2002, KDD.

[17]  Ker-I Ko Integral equations, systems of quadratic equations, and exponential time completeness , 1991, STOC '91.

[18]  Mark Newman,et al.  Networks: An Introduction , 2010 .

[19]  Xin Chen,et al.  Centralized and decentralized rumor blocking problems , 2017, J. Comb. Optim..

[20]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  On the Computational Complexity of Integral Equations , 1992, Ann. Pure Appl. Log..

[21]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Efficient Computation of the Shapley Value for Game-Theoretic Network Centrality , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[22]  Hanrui Zhang,et al.  On the Equivalence Between High-Order Network-Influence Frameworks: General-Threshold, Hypergraph-Triggering, and Logic-Triggering Models , 2020, ArXiv.

[23]  Christian Borgs,et al.  Maximizing Social Influence in Nearly Optimal Time , 2012, SODA.

[24]  Yifei Yuan,et al.  Scalable Influence Maximization in Social Networks under the Linear Threshold Model , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[25]  Wei Chen,et al.  Interplay between Social Influence and Network Centrality: A Comparative Study on Shapley Centrality and Single-Node-Influence Centrality , 2016, WWW.

[26]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[27]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[28]  Laks V. S. Lakshmanan,et al.  Information and Influence Propagation in Social Networks , 2013, Synthesis Lectures on Data Management.

[29]  Éva Tardos,et al.  Influential Nodes in a Diffusion Model for Social Networks , 2005, ICALP.

[30]  Stephen P. Borgatti,et al.  Identifying sets of key players in a social network , 2006, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[31]  Zhao Zhang,et al.  Approximation Algorithm for Minimum Weight Connected m-Fold Dominating Set , 2015, ArXiv.

[32]  Xiaokui Xiao,et al.  Influence Maximization in Near-Linear Time: A Martingale Approach , 2015, SIGMOD Conference.

[33]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  Separating and collapsing results on the relativized probabilistic polynomial-time hierarchy , 1990, JACM.

[34]  Wen-Guey Tzeng,et al.  Learning String Patterns and Tree Patterns from Examples , 1990, ML.

[35]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Ranking systems: the PageRank axioms , 2005, EC '05.

[36]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Mining the network value of customers , 2001, KDD '01.

[37]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  On the complexity of finding paths in a two-dimensional domain I: Shortest paths , 2004, Math. Log. Q..

[38]  Oscar Volij,et al.  The Measurement of Intellectual Influence , 2002 .

[39]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  The interplay between dynamics and networks: centrality, communities, and cheeger inequality , 2014, KDD.

[40]  J. Shepherdson Computational Complexity of Real Functions , 1985 .

[41]  Ker-I Ko,et al.  Continuous optimization problems and a polynomial hierarchy of real functions , 1985, J. Complex..

[42]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .