Performance of six bone collectors designed for dental implant surgery.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to perform an in vitro comparison of six bone collectors for harvesting of particulate bone. MATERIAL AND METHODS Four commercially available bone collectors (Frios, Osseous Coagulum Trap, ACE Autografter, Bone Trap) and two custom-designed models were tested. Three different in vitro tests were performed to determine the harvesting capabilities of the collectors. In test I, a bovine mandible was drilled and the bone collectors were used to collect bone chips. The harvested bone volumes and dry weights were measured after harvesting. In test II, three dental implant sites were prepared in a bovine mandible. The bones from the implant osteotomies were collected, and bone volumes and dry weights were measured. In test III, 1 ml of bone chips was mixed with water, and suctioned through the bone collectors. The volumes of the bone chips retained were measured to determine the efficiency of each collector. RESULTS The Osseous Coagulum Trap and the custom-made collectors were the most effective instruments in test I. The mean volumes ranged from 0.17 to 0.38 ml. In test II, the difference between the collectors was small and the bone volume ranged from 0.28 to 0.37 ml. In test III, the Bone Trap became blocked before the other collectors, and its bone procurement was therefore limited. CONCLUSION Comparison of six different bone collectors in this in vitro study showed that all collectors are usable in clinical situations but their effectiveness varies.

[1]  W. Sendyk,et al.  Viability of autogenous bone grafts obtained by using bone collectors: histological and microbiological study. , 2003, Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research.

[2]  C. Clokie,et al.  Cortical bone grafts used to culture bone cells to be used for increasing efficacy of bone morphogenetic proteins in tissue engineered bone substitutes , 2003 .

[3]  V. Kainulainen,et al.  Augmentation of the narrow traumatized anterior alveolar ridge to facilitate dental implant placement. , 2003, Dental traumatology : official publication of International Association for Dental Traumatology.

[4]  V. Kainulainen,et al.  Zygomatic bone: an additional donor site for alveolar bone reconstruction. Technical note. , 2002, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  H. Worthington,et al.  Bone collected during dental implant surgery: a clinical and histological study. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[6]  H. Worthington,et al.  The effects of an immediately pre-surgical chlorhexidine oral rinse on the bacterial contaminants of bone debris collected during dental implant surgery. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[7]  Luca Cordaro,et al.  Clinical results of alveolar ridge augmentation with mandibular block bone grafts in partially edentulous patients prior to implant placement. , 2002, Clinical oral implants research.

[8]  K. S. Smith,et al.  Bone volume collected from dental implant sites during osteotomy. , 2001, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  M. Korachi,et al.  Microbial analysis of bone collected during implant surgery: a clinical and laboratory study. , 2001, Clinical oral implants research.

[10]  G. Widmark,et al.  Augmentation of exposed implant threads with autogenous bone chips: prospective clinical study. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[11]  V. Kainulainen,et al.  Comparison of four bone collectors designed for oral and maxillofacial surgery--an in vitro study. , 1998, Clinical oral implants research.

[12]  J. Kent,et al.  Bone maintenance 5 to 10 years after sinus grafting. , 1998, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  C. Misch Comparison of intraoral donor sites for onlay grafting prior to implant placement. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  V. Kainulainen,et al.  A method of harvesting corticocancellous bone chips for reconstructive maxillofacial surgery. , 1997, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[15]  D. Carnes,et al.  Ability of commercial demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to induce new bone formation. , 1996, Journal of periodontology.

[16]  U. Lekholm,et al.  Variations in bone regeneration adjacent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized freeze-dried bone or autologous grafts: a study in dogs. , 1995, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  R. Marx,et al.  Clinical application of bone biology to mandibular and maxillary reconstruction. , 1994, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[18]  M. Habal,et al.  Bone Grafts and Bone Substitutes , 1994 .

[19]  S. Sindet‐Pedersen,et al.  Reconstruction of alveolar clefts with mandibular or iliac crest bone grafts: a comparative study. , 1990, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[20]  S. Sindet‐Pedersen,et al.  Mandibular bone grafts for reconstruction of alveolar clefts. , 1988, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[21]  J. Mellonig,et al.  The effect of particle size on the osteogenic activity of composite grafts of allogeneic freeze-dried bone and autogenous marrow. , 1980, Journal of periodontology.