Adult Spinal Deformity Surgeons Are Unable to Accurately Predict Postoperative Spinal Alignment Using Clinical Judgment Alone

OBJECT Adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery seeks to reduce disability and improve quality of life through restoration of spinal alignment. In particular, correction of sagittal malalignment is correlated with patient outcome. Inadequate correction of sagittal deformity is not infrequent. The present study assessed surgeons' ability to accurately predict postoperative alignment. METHODS Seventeen cases were presented with preoperative radiographic measurements, and a summary of the operation as performed by the treating physician. Surgeon training, practice characteristics, and use of surgical planning software was assessed. Participants predicted if the surgical plan would lead to adequate deformity correction and attempted to predict postoperative radiographic parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence to lumbar lordosis mismatch (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK). RESULTS Seventeen surgeons participated: 71% within 0 to 10 years of practice; 88% devote >25% of their practice to deformity surgery. Surgeons accurately judged adequacy of the surgical plan to achieve correction to specific thresholds of SVA 69% ± 8%, PT 68% ± 9%, and PI-LL 68% ± 11% of the time. However, surgeons correctly predicted the actual postoperative radiographic parameters only 42% ± 6% of the time. They were more successful at predicting PT (61% ± 10%) than SVA (45% ± 8%), PI-LL (26% ± 11%), or TK change (35% ± 21%; p < .05). Improved performance correlated with greater focus on deformity but not number of years in practice or number of three-column osteotomies performed per year. CONCLUSION Surgeons failed to correctly predict the adequacy of the proposed surgical plan in approximately one third of presented cases. They were better at determining whether a surgical plan would achieve adequate correction than predicting specific postoperative alignment parameters. Pelvic tilt and SVA were predicted with the greatest accuracy.

[1]  Munish C. Gupta,et al.  Multicenter validation of a formula predicting postoperative spinopelvic alignment. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  S. Ondra,et al.  A Method for Calculating the Exact Angle Required during Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Fixed Sagittal Deformity: Comparison with the Trigonometric Method , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[3]  J. Buchowski,et al.  Role of Pelvic Incidence, Thoracic Kyphosis, and Patient Factors on Sagittal Plane Correction Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy , 2009, Spine.

[4]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Cervical Radiographical Alignment: Comprehensive Assessment Techniques and Potential Importance in Cervical Myelopathy , 2013, Spine.

[5]  William Horton,et al.  The Impact of Positive Sagittal Balance in Adult Spinal Deformity , 2005, Spine.

[6]  S. Ondra,et al.  Mathematical Calculation of Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Size to Allow Precision Correction of Fixed Sagittal Deformity , 2006, Spine.

[7]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Sagittal realignment failures following pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery: are we doing enough?: Clinical article. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Results of Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomies for Fixed Sagittal Imbalance: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up Study , 2007, Spine.

[9]  O. Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Changes in Thoracic Kyphosis Negatively Impact Sagittal Alignment After Lumbar Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy: A Comprehensive Radiographic Analysis , 2012, Spine.

[10]  F. Schwab,et al.  Spino-Pelvic Parameters After Surgery Can be Predicted: A Preliminary Formula and Validation of Standing Alignment , 2011, Spine.

[11]  Ashish Patel,et al.  Pelvic Tilt and Truncal Inclination: Two Key Radiographic Parameters in the Setting of Adults With Spinal Deformity , 2009, Spine.

[12]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Impact of spinopelvic alignment on decision making in deformity surgery in adults: A review. , 2012, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[13]  F. Schwab,et al.  Adult Spinal Deformity—Postoperative Standing Imbalance: How Much Can You Tolerate? An Overview of Key Parameters in Assessing Alignment and Planning Corrective Surgery , 2010, Spine.

[14]  William Horton,et al.  Correlation of Radiographic Parameters and Clinical Symptoms in Adult Scoliosis , 2005, Spine.

[15]  W. Skalli,et al.  Radiographic Outcomes of Adult Spinal Deformity Correction: A Critical Analysis of Variability and Failures Across Deformity Patterns , 2014, Spine deformity.

[16]  Oheneba Boachie-Adjei,et al.  Radiographical Spinopelvic Parameters and Disability in the Setting of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Prospective Multicenter Analysis , 2013, Spine.

[17]  Steven Glassman,et al.  Impact of magnitude and percentage of global sagittal plane correction on health-related quality of life at 2-years follow-up. , 2012, Neurosurgery.

[18]  C. Ames,et al.  Use of Surgimap Spine in sagittal plane analysis, osteotomy planning, and correction calculation. , 2013, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.