Application of Galerkin Finite-Element Method with Newton Iterations in Computing Steady-State Solutions of Unipolar Charge Currents in Corona Devices

The phenomenon of corona discharge from thin-wire or sharp-point electrodes has found various important applications especially when effective charging devices are needed. In most parts of the corona charge transport region, the unipolar charge current is established as a consequence of the drifting of ions of single polarity along the electric field lines. With negligible diffusion effects, the equation governing charge transport appears to be of hyperbolic type and has been commonly dealt with by the method of characteristics or with upwind treatments. The Poisson's equation governing the electric potential distribution in the presence of unipolar charge, on the other hand, is of elliptic type and has been conveniently dealt with by the finite-element method or the equivalent for typical boundary-value problems. The first-principle based modeling of the corona device behavior has often involved either back-and-forth iterations of solving for one of the variables with others fixed or using time integrations even when steady states are sought. In the present work, the Galerkin finite-element method is applied uniformly to all the equations in the mathematical system and the Newton iteration method is utilized to obtain quadratically converged steady-state solutions in a few steps. Straightforward application of a typical Galerkin finite-element procedure to all the equations is shown to be quite adequate, because no mechanism for boundary layer formation is present in the unipolar charge current in corona devices. Wiggle-free numerical solutions can be obtained without invoking the upwind schemes or excessive mesh refinements.

[1]  G. Strang,et al.  An Analysis of the Finite Element Method , 1974 .

[2]  P. Hood,et al.  Frontal solution program for unsymmetric matrices , 1976 .

[3]  P. Hood,et al.  Note on frontal solution program1 for unsymmetric matrices , 1977 .

[4]  Wallace B. Smith,et al.  A mathematical model for calculating electrical conditions in wire‐duct electrostatic precipitation devices , 1977 .

[5]  A. Baird Positive DC Coronas with Arbitrary Outer-Conductor Geometries , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[6]  W. Janischewskyj,et al.  Finite Element Solution for Electric Fields of Coronating DC Transmission Lines , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[7]  Tsutomu Ikeda,et al.  Calculation of ION Flow Fields of HVDC Transmission Lines By the Finite Element Method , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[8]  M. Abdel-Salam,et al.  Finite Element Solution of Monopolar Corona Equation , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Electrical Insulation.

[9]  J. Hoburg,et al.  Wire-duct precipitator field and charge computation using finite element and characteristics methods , 1983 .

[10]  Mark N. Horenstein,et al.  Computation of Corona Space Charge, Electric Field, and V-I Characteristic Using Equipotential Charge Shells , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[11]  G. Kallio,et al.  Computation of electrical conditions inside wire‐duct electrostatic precipitators using a combined finite‐element, finite‐difference technique , 1986 .

[12]  R. S. Sigmond The unipolar corona space charge flow problem , 1986 .

[13]  Charge transport in viscous vortex flows , 1987 .

[14]  G. S. Peter Castle,et al.  Modeling of corona characteristics in a wire-duct precipitator using the charge simulation technique , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[15]  C. Budd,et al.  A new approach to the space-charge problem , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[16]  J. Hoburg,et al.  Donor cell-finite element descriptions of wire-duct precipitator fields, charges and efficiencies , 1988, Conference Record of the 1988 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[17]  Charge transport in Navier-Stokes flow , 1988 .

[18]  Z. J. Cendes,et al.  Interfacing the finite-element method with the method of characteristics in self-consistent electrostatic field models , 1989 .

[19]  T. Hughes,et al.  Streamline upwind/Petrov-Galerkin formulations for convection dominated flows with particular emphasis on the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations , 1990 .

[20]  Giovanni Ghione,et al.  Two-dimensional finite-boxes analysis of monopolar corona fields including ion diffusion , 1990 .

[21]  K. Adamiak Simulation of corona in wire-duct electrostatic precipitator by means of the boundary element method , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[22]  K. Adamiak,et al.  Adaptive approach to finite element modelling of corona fields , 1992, Conference Record of the 1992 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting.

[23]  Mazen Abdel-Salam,et al.  Finite-element analysis of monopolar ionized fields including ion diffusion , 1993 .

[24]  Assessment of corona models based on the Deutsch approximation , 1994 .

[25]  Non-Laplacian ion trajectories in mutually interacting corona discharges , 1997 .

[26]  C. Fletcher,et al.  A pseudotransient approach to steady state solution of electric field-space charge coupled problems , 1998 .

[27]  James Q. Feng An analysis of corona currents between two concentric cylindrical electrodes , 1999 .