Deriving tissue density and elastic modulus from microCT bone scans.

Tissue level density and elastic modulus are intrinsic properties that can be used to quantify bone material and analyses incorporating those quantities have been used to evaluate bone on a macroscopic scale. Micro-computed tomography (microCT) technology has been used to construct tissue level finite element models to simulate macroscopic fracture strength, however, a single method for assigning voxel-specific tissue density and elastic modulus based on those data has not been universally accepted. One method prevalent in the literature utilizes an empirical relationship that derives tissue stiffness as a function of bone calcium content weight fraction. To derive calcium content weight fraction from microCT scans, a measure of tissue density is required and a constant value is traditionally used. However, experimental data suggest a non-trivial amount of tissue heterogeneity suggesting a constant tissue density may not be appropriate. A theoretical derivation for determining the relationship between voxel-specific tissue density and microCT scan data (i.e., microCT derived tissue mineral density (TMD), mgHA/cm(3)) and bone constituent properties is proposed. Constant model parameters used in the derivation include the density of water, ash, and organics (i.e., bone constituents) and the volume fraction of the organics constituent. The effect of incorporating the theoretically derived tissue density (instead of a constant value) in determining voxel-specific elastic modulus resulted in a maximum observed increase of 12GPa (5.9GPa versus 17.9GPa, for the constant value and derived tissue density formulations, respectively) for a measured TMD of 1.02gHA/cm(3). Average and bounding quantities for the four constant model parameters were defined from the literature and the influence of those values on the derived tissue density and elastic modulus relationships were also evaluated. The theoretical relationships of tissue density and elastic modulus, with the average constant model parameters applied, were consistent with previously published empirical relationships derived from experimental data. Tissue density as a function of microCT TMD was formulated as a linear relationship and the density of water and ash was shown to solely influence the proportionality (i.e., slope) between those values. The density of water and organics (i.e., collagen) and the volume fraction of the organics constituent were shown to influence the constant offset (intercept) between tissue density and TMD with no influence from ash density. Incorporating tissue density heterogeneity into the derivation of elastic modulus resulted in a significant increase in predicted modulus (for microCT TMD ranges observed for healthy tissue) as compared to when a constant tissue density was used. The presented approach provides a novel method for deriving tissue-level bone material properties and quantifies the effect of assuming tissue homogeneity when calculating elastic modulus (when using a prevalent method in the literature) from microCT scan data.

[1]  R. Robinson Physicochemical Structure of Bone , 1975 .

[2]  E. Ritman,et al.  The effect of risedronate on bone mineralization as measured by micro-computed tomography with synchrotron radiation: correlation to histomorphometric indices of turnover. , 2005, Bone.

[3]  M. Deakins Changes in the Ash, Water, and Organic Content of Pig Enamel During Calcification , 1942 .

[4]  Ann L Oberg,et al.  Effects of Sex and Age on Bone Microstructure at the Ultradistal Radius: A Population‐Based Noninvasive In Vivo Assessment , 2005, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[5]  P. Meunier,et al.  The Degree of Mineralization of Bone Tissue Measured by Computerized Quantitative Contact Microradiography , 2002, Calcified Tissue International.

[6]  G. Pharr,et al.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  M. V. D. van der Meulen,et al.  Finite element models predict cancellous apparent modulus when tissue modulus is scaled from specimen CT-attenuation. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  R. Whitehead Biopsies , 1954, British medical journal.

[9]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Some basic relationships between density values in cancellous and cortical bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo Determination of Bone Structure in Postmenopausal Women: A Comparison of HR‐pQCT and High‐Field MR Imaging , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  J. Day Bone Quality: The Mechanical Effects of Microarchitecture and Matrix Properties , 2005 .

[12]  Thomas A Einhorn,et al.  Micro-computed tomography assessment of fracture healing: relationships among callus structure, composition, and mechanical function. , 2009, Bone.

[13]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Quantitative Assessment of Bone Tissue Mineralization with Polychromatic Micro-Computed Tomography , 2008, Calcified Tissue International.

[14]  G. Beaupré,et al.  Letter to the Editor referring to the article "Mineral heterogeneity affects predictions of intratrabecular stress and strain" published in Journal of Biomechanics (volume 44, Issue 3, Pages 402-407). , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Processing and Analysis of In Vivo High-Resolution MR Images of Trabecular Bone for Longitudinal Studies: Reproducibility of Structural Measures and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Mechanical Properties , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[16]  T. V. Eijden,et al.  Degree and Distribution of Mineralization in the Human Mandibular Condyle , 2006, Calcified Tissue International.

[17]  Robin O Cleveland,et al.  Derivation of elastic stiffness from site-matched mineral density and acoustic impedance maps , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  G. Beaupré,et al.  The influence of bone volume fraction and ash fraction on bone strength and modulus. , 2001, Bone.

[19]  J. Currey Physical characteristics affecting the tensile failure properties of compact bone. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  E. O'flaherty,et al.  Physiologically based models for bone-seeking elements. I. Rat skeletal and bone growth. , 1991, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[21]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro–computed tomography , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[22]  R. Robinson,et al.  The Water Content of Bone , 1957 .

[23]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  Intratrabecular distribution of tissue stiffness and mineralization in developing trabecular bone. , 2007, Bone.

[24]  Ara Nazarian,et al.  Specimen size and porosity can introduce error into microCT-based tissue mineral density measurements. , 2009, Bone.

[25]  S. Judex,et al.  Accretion of Bone Quantity and Quality in the Developing Mouse Skeleton , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[26]  R. Recker,et al.  Bone histomorphometry : techniques and interpretation , 1983 .

[27]  J. K. Gong,et al.  The density of organic and volatile and non‐volatile inorganic components of bone , 1964, The Anatomical record.

[28]  T. van Eijden,et al.  Variations in mineralization affect the stress and strain distributions in cortical and trabecular bone. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[29]  J. Currey,et al.  What determines the bending strength of compact bone? , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[30]  R. Robinson,et al.  The water content of bone. I. The mass of water, inorganic crystals, organic matrix, and CO2 space components in a unit volume of the dog bone. , 1957, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  J. H. Koolstra,et al.  Relationship between tissue stiffness and degree of mineralization of developing trabecular bone. , 2008, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[32]  R. Bear The Structure of Collagen Molecules and Fibrils , 1956, The Journal of biophysical and biochemical cytology.

[33]  T. van Eijden,et al.  Regional variations in mineralization and strain distributions in the cortex of the human mandibular condyle. , 2007, Bone.

[34]  T. van Eijden,et al.  Mineral heterogeneity affects predictions of intratrabecular stress and strain. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[35]  E. O'flaherty,et al.  Physiologically based models for bone-seeking elements. III. Human skeletal and bone growth. , 1991, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[36]  Jan Harm Koolstra,et al.  Biomechanical consequences of developmental changes in trabecular architecture and mineralization of the pig mandibular condyle. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[37]  J. K. Gong,et al.  Composition of trabecular and cortical bone , 1964, The Anatomical record.

[38]  L J van Ruijven,et al.  Biomechanical effect of mineral heterogeneity in trabecular bone. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[39]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Validation of quantitative backscattered electron imaging for the measurement of mineral density distribution in human bone biopsies. , 1998, Bone.

[40]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Quantitative micro-computed tomography: a non-invasive method to assess equivalent bone mineral density. , 2008, Bone.

[41]  Jan Harm Koolstra,et al.  Development of the Micro Architecture and Mineralization of the Basilar Part of the Pig Occipital Bone , 2008, Connective tissue research.

[42]  Marco Viceconti,et al.  An accurate estimation of bone density improves the accuracy of subject-specific finite element models. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[43]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[44]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Age- and Gender-Related Differences in the Geometric Properties and Biomechanical Significance of Intracortical Porosity in the Distal Radius and Tibia , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[45]  R Huiskes,et al.  Indirect determination of trabecular bone effective tissue failure properties using micro-finite element simulations. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[46]  B. van Rietbergen,et al.  Bone micro-architecture and determinants of strength in the radius and tibia: age-related changes in a population-based study of normal adults measured with high-resolution pQCT , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[47]  F. Eckstein,et al.  Image-based micro-finite-element modeling for improved distal radius strength diagnosis: moving from bench to bedside. , 2004, Journal of clinical densitometry : the official journal of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.

[48]  Glen L Niebur,et al.  Improved accuracy of cortical bone mineralization measured by polychromatic microcomputed tomography using a novel high mineral density composite calibration phantom. , 2010, Medical physics.

[49]  Martin Rb Porosity and specific surface of bone. , 1984 .

[50]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo Assessment of Architecture and Micro-Finite Element Analysis Derived Indices of Mechanical Properties of Trabecular Bone in the Radius , 2002, Osteoporosis International.