Preface to the Special Issue “Ecologically sustainable fishing”: Project KESKALA background, objectives and conclusions

‘Ecosystem-based fisheries management — criteria for the sustainable fishing’ project was started in 2005. The general aims were to define the main factors that affect the state and demography of fish populations, and to develop a strategy for fishing and fish stock management abiding by the principles of sustainable use. The key objectives were to investigate (1) the effects of fishing on abundance, structure, production and genetic characteristics of fish populations, (2) the effects of maternal traits on the amount and quality of offspring, (3) the effects of piscivore fishing on the ecosystem, (4) the factors affecting the interactions between fishes, and (5) the reliability of different methods in estimating fish population abundance and structure. The perch (Perca fluviatilis), pike (Esox lucius) and pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) were chosen as the main target species because they are the most abundant species in the recreational catches in Finland (Natural Resources Institute Finland 2015), but little studied from the abovementioned points of view. The maternal effects (i.e., the effects of female traits on the offspring characteristics) were studied in all three species. Special attention was paid to the role of large individuals in maintaining population renewability and to the effects of different fishing strategies on the food web structure and biological interactions. The experimental study lakes were located in the Evo forest area in southern Finland (61°13 ́N, 25°12 ́E). In addition, studies were carried out in some larger lakes in southern and central Finland (Roikonen 2014, Vainikka et al. 2017). The project was conducted in co-operation by the University of Helsinki and the Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute (as of 1 Jan. 2015 Natural Resources Institute Finland), and financially supported mainly by the Bergsrådet Bror Serlachius Foundation.

[1]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Should I stay or should I go? The diurnal behaviour of plant-attached zooplankton in lakes with different water transparency , 2017 .

[2]  J. Kubečka,et al.  Latitudinal variation in sexual dimorphism in life‐history traits of a freshwater fish , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[3]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Sex-dependent responses of perch to changes in water clarity and temperature , 2015 .

[4]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Feeding under predation risk: potential sex‐specific response of perch (Perca fluviatilis) , 2014 .

[5]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Feeding efficiency of planktivores under disturbance, the effect of water colour, predation threat and shoal composition. , 2014, Journal of fish biology.

[6]  A. Kuparinen,et al.  Intensive fishing can mediate stronger size-dependent maternal effect in pike (Esox lucius) , 2013, Hydrobiologia.

[7]  A. Kuparinen,et al.  Importance of maternal size on the reproductive success of perch, Perca fluviatilis, in small forest lakes: implications for fisheries management , 2012 .

[8]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Gender-dependent effects of water quality and conspecific density on the feeding rate of fish – factors behind sexual growth dimorphism , 2011 .

[9]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Diet shifts and food selection of perch Perca fluviatilis and roach Rutilus rutilus in humic lakes of varying water colour. , 2010, Journal of fish biology.

[10]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Perch production in forest lakes: the contribution of abiotic and biotic factors , 2010 .

[11]  H. Lehtonen,et al.  Environmental factors regulate the effects of roach Rutilus rutilus and pike Esox lucius on perch Perca fluviatilis populations in small boreal forest lakes. , 2010, Journal of fish biology.

[12]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Seasonal fluctuations in macrophyte cover and water transparency of four brown-water lakes: implications for crustacean zooplankton in littoral and pelagic habitats , 2009, Hydrobiologia.

[13]  H. Lehtonen,et al.  The capability of harvestable slot-length limit regulation in conserving large and old northern pike (Esox lucius) , 2017 .

[14]  A. Vainikka,et al.  Model-based evaluation of the management of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) stocks using minimum and maximum size limits , 2017 .

[15]  H. Lehtonen,et al.  Effects of non-selective and size-selective fishing on perch populations in a small lake , 2017 .

[16]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Zooplankton rhapsody: Unexpected response in community following increased fish predation , 2017 .

[17]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Roach (Rutilus rutilus) populations respond to varying environment by altering size structure and growth rate , 2017 .

[18]  H. Lehtonen,et al.  An evaluation of gillnet CPUE as an index of perch density in small forest lakes , 2016 .

[19]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Troubled by the humics — effects of water colour and interspecific competition on the feeding efficiency of planktivorous perch , 2012 .

[20]  L. Nurminen,et al.  Troubled by the Humics , 2012 .