An outline of the pattern of bacterial generation times.

SUMMARY: The generation times of four species of organisms have been measured, each under several sets of conditions: Aerobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Streptococcus faecalis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Minor variations in the experimental conditions appear to affect the mean generation time less in large samples than in small. This can be explained as a result of association between the generation times of closely related organisms. Positive correlation between the generation times of sisters, cousins and perhaps second cousins shows that the influence of an ancestor is felt through two or three generations. The observed correlation between mothers and daughters is usually small, probably because of bias due to the interval between fission of cytoplasm and fission of cell wall. The coefficient of variation of generation time is not a constant for the species but it is stable under given circumstances. It is possibly related systematically to the chemical complexity of the growth medium. In unhampered growth, less than 1% of the organisms produced are non-viable. There is positive association between the viabilities of sisters, and between the viability of an organism and the generation time of its mother. The distribution of generation times can be represented by a Pearson Type III or else a Pearson Type V distribution; both are convenient in applications. The generation time of an individual is considered to be determined partly by molecular accidents, partly by heredity.

[1]  G. Wilson THE PROPORTION OF VIABLE BACTERIA IN YOUNG CULTURES WITH ESPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE TECHNIQUE EMPLOYED IN COUNTING , 1922, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  O. Rahn A CHEMICAL EXPLANATION OF THE VARIABILITY OF THE GROWTH RATE , 1932, The Journal of general physiology.

[3]  O. Rahn,et al.  The Growth Rate of Individual Bacterial Cells , 1932, Journal of bacteriology.

[4]  363. Physicochemical aspects of bacterial growth. Part I. Dependence of growth of Bact. lactis aerogenes on concentration of medium , 1938 .

[5]  D. Herbert,et al.  Crystalline bacterial catalase. , 1948, The Biochemical journal.

[6]  David G. Kendall,et al.  ON THE ROLE OF VARIABLE GENERATION TIME IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF A STOCHASTIC BIRTH PROCESS , 1948 .

[7]  E. Powell,et al.  A culture chamber for the microscopical study of living bacteria with some observations on the spore-bearing aerobes. , 1951, Journal. Royal Microscopical Society.

[8]  D. Kendall On the Choice of a Mathematical Model to Represent Normal Bacterial Growth , 1952 .

[9]  G. Box NON-NORMALITY AND TESTS ON VARIANCES , 1953 .

[10]  H. Rogers Variant populations within a hyaluronidase-producing culture of Staphylococcus aureus. , 1953, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[11]  A. Eddy Death rate of populations of Bact. lactis aerogenes. I. Active adjustment of cells to adverse environments , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[12]  Death rate of populations of Bact. lactis aerogenes. II. Environmental and other factors influencing the form of the survival curve , 1953, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.

[13]  J. Bradfield,et al.  The urea method for bacterial viability counts with the electron microscope and its relation to other viability counting methods. , 1954, Journal of general microbiology.

[14]  W. Hughes The differences in antibiotic sensitivity of closely related single cells of Proteus vulgaris. , 1955, Journal of general microbiology.

[15]  The inheritance of differences in growth rate in Escherichia coli. , 1955, Journal of general microbiology.

[16]  J. Tomcsik,et al.  Bacterial cells walls as revealed by the specific cell-wall reaction and by direct staining with alcian blue. , 1955, Journal of general microbiology.

[17]  G. Yule On the Methods of Measuring Association between Two Attributes , 1912 .