Target localisation techniques and tools for multiple-input multiple-output radar

This study presents a comparative study of coherent and non-coherent target localisation techniques for multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) radar systems with widely distributed elements. Performance is evaluated based on closed-form solutions developed for the best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) for each of the localisation methods. These estimators afford insights into the relation between radar locations, target location and localisation accuracy. In particular, the means squared error of the BLUE is factored into a term dependent on signal and processing characteristics and a term dependent on sensor locations. The latter is referred to as geometric dilution of precision (GDOP). The best achievable accuracy for the coherent case is obtained, and a comparative study with the non-coherent case is presented. MIMO radar systems with coherent processing are shown to benefit from a gain because of coherent processing among sensors. This gain is referred to as coherent localisation gain, and it is proportional to the ratio of the signal carrier frequency to the effective bandwidth (a large ratio for typical signals). The footprint of multiple transmit/receive sensors results in a gain, referred to as MIMO gain, for both processing techniques. The MIMO gain is proportional to the product of the number of transmitting and receiving sensors. Analysis of the MIMO gain through the use of GDOP contour maps demonstrate the achievable accuracy at various target locations for a given layout of sensors.

[1]  F.C. Robey,et al.  MIMO radar theory and experimental results , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[2]  J. Tabrikian,et al.  Target Detection and Localization Using MIMO Radars and Sonars , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  D. Fuhrmann,et al.  Transmit beamforming for MIMO radar systems using partial signal correlation , 2004, Conference Record of the Thirty-Eighth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, 2004..

[4]  Alexander M. Haimovich,et al.  Spatial Diversity in Radars—Models and Detection Performance , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[5]  A. W. Rihaczek Principles of high-resolution radar , 1969 .

[6]  Jian Li,et al.  MIMO Radar with Colocated Antennas , 2007, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[7]  R. Yarlagadda,et al.  GPS GDOP metric , 2000 .

[8]  Ariela Zeira,et al.  Realizable lower bounds for time delay estimation , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[9]  Charles E. Cook,et al.  Radar Signals: An Introduction to Theory and Application , 1967 .

[10]  L.J. Cimini,et al.  MIMO Radar with Widely Separated Antennas , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[11]  N. Levanon Lowest GDOP in 2-D scenarios , 2000 .

[12]  A. Weiss,et al.  Fundamental limitations in passive time delay estimation--Part I: Narrow-band systems , 1983 .

[13]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  Concepts and Applications of a MIMO Radar System with Widely Separated Antennas , 2009 .

[14]  P. M. Woodward 3 – INFORMATION THEORY , 1953 .

[15]  Bradford W. Parkinson,et al.  Global positioning system : theory and applications , 1996 .

[16]  Harry Lee,et al.  A Novel Procedure for Assessing the Accuracy of Hyperbolic Multilateration Systems , 1975, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[17]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  MIMO radar: an idea whose time has come , 2004, Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE Radar Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37509).