Aggregating evidence in pavement management decision-making using belief functions and qualitative Markov tree

This paper applies the combined use of qualitative Markov trees and belief functions (otherwise known as Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence), to pavement management decision-making. The basic concepts of the belief function approach-basic probability assignments, belief functions and plausibility functions-are discussed. This paper also discusses the construction of the qualitative Markov tree (join tree). The combined use of the two methods provides a framework for dealing with uncertainty, incomplete data, and imprecise information in the presence of multiple evidences on decision variables. The approach is very appropriate, since it presents more improved methodology and analysis than traditional probability methods applied in pavement management decision-making. Traditional probability theory as a mathematical framework for conceptualizing uncertainty, incomplete data and imprecise information has several shortcomings that have been augmented by several alternative theories. An example is presented to illustrate the construction of qualitative Markov trees, from the evidential network and the solution algorithm. The purpose of the paper is to demonstrate how the evidential network and the qualitative Markov tree can be constructed, and how the propagation of m-values can be handled in the network.

[1]  B Attoh-Okine Addressing Uncertainties in Flexible Pavement Maintenance Decisions at Project Level Using Bayesian Influence Diagrams , 1993 .

[2]  B. Attoh-Okine Potential application of Bayesian influence diagram in a pavement management system , 1993, 1993 (2nd) International Symposium on Uncertainty Modeling and Analysis.

[3]  Wayne J. Davis,et al.  Optimal maintenance decisions for pavement management , 1987 .

[4]  Kamran Majidzadeh,et al.  INTEGRATED PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE MANAGEMENT OPTIMIZATION , 1993 .

[5]  Dimitri A. Grivas,et al.  STATE INCREMENT OPTIMIZATION METHODOLOGY FOR NETWORK-LEVEL PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT , 1993 .

[6]  John P Zaniewski,et al.  REVISIONS TO ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1993 .

[7]  David R. Martinelli,et al.  BELIEF-FUNCTION FRAMEWORK FOR HANDLING UNCERTAINTIES IN PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DECISION MAKING , 1994 .

[8]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  The belief‐function approach to aggregating audit evidence , 1995, Int. J. Intell. Syst..

[9]  Nii O. Attoh-Okine,et al.  Institutional Issues in Implementation of Pavement Management Systems by Local Agencies , 1996 .

[10]  Enrique F. Castillo,et al.  Expert Systems and Probabilistic Network Models , 1996, Monographs in Computer Science.

[11]  Samer Madanat,et al.  Optimal infrastructure management decisions under uncertainty , 1993 .

[12]  R. P. Srivastava,et al.  Audit Decisions Using Belief Functions: A Review , 1997 .

[13]  Glenn Shafer,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Evidence , 2020, A Mathematical Theory of Evidence.

[14]  Edward H. Shortliffe,et al.  A Method for Managing Evidential Reasoning in a Hierarchical Hypothesis Space , 1985, Artif. Intell..

[15]  Ram B. Kulkarni,et al.  DYNAMIC DECISION MODEL FOR A PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM , 1984 .