Characterizing Compaction Variability with an Electromagnetic Induction Sensor in a Puddled Paddy Rice Field

Paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) fields are repeatedly puddled at water saturation to loosen the top soil and to form a uniformly compacted plow pan required to reduce losses of water and nutrients. In paddy growing conditions however, the non-invasive detection of compaction variation within the plow pan layer is challenging. This paper evaluates a proximal soil sensing based methodology to identify areas compacted by different intensities of puddling to support precise land preparation of paddy rice fields. Therefore, a 1.6-ha alluvial paddy field of silt loam texture (Aeric Haplaquepts) located in the Brahmaputra floodplain of Bangladesh was selected. Three areas within the field were variably puddled and characterized by soil properties and soil apparent electrical conductivity (ECa). The Floating Soil Sensing System (FLoSSY) employing the EM38 electromagnetic induction sensor was used to record the ECa of the soil for each of the puddling intensities. The effects of plow pan compaction on water percolation losses and paddy yield were assessed. The results show that the variably puddled areas had significant differences in soil bulk density which was linked to the soil penetration resistance. Spatial comparison of ECa data sets showed that the ECa values increased systematically under increased puddling. Sufficient soil compaction could be identified when percolation losses were significantly the lowest and paddy yield was significantly the highest. It was concluded that a non-invasive ECa survey using electromagnetic induction based soil sensing allowed the detection of soil heterogeneity linked to soil compaction caused by puddling, which offers an interesting potential for precision puddling and land preparation in paddy rice fields.

[1]  D. Datta,et al.  Principles and Practices of Rice Production , 1981 .

[2]  S. Kukal,et al.  Puddling depth and intensity effects in rice-wheat system on a sandy loam soil. II. Water use and crop performance , 2003 .

[3]  L. Cockx,et al.  A pedotransfer function to evaluate the soil profile textural heterogeneity using proximally sensed apparent electrical conductivity , 2009 .

[4]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  Delineating water management zones in a paddy rice field using a Floating Soil Sensing System , 2011 .

[5]  S. Datta,et al.  Puddling Influence on Soil, Rice Development, and Yield1 , 1985 .

[6]  A. Hemmat,et al.  Effect of puddling intensity on physical properties of a silty clay soil under laboratory and field conditions , 2009, Paddy and Water Environment.

[7]  Ss Kukal,et al.  Puddling depth and intensity effects in rice–wheat system on a sandy loam soil: I. Development of subsurface compaction , 2003 .

[8]  T. Steenhuis,et al.  Soil physical responses to novel rice cultural practices in the rice–wheat system: Comparative evidence from a swelling soil in Nepal , 2006 .

[9]  P. García-Navarro,et al.  Overland water and salt flows in a set of rice paddies , 2008 .

[10]  A. Walkley,et al.  AN EXAMINATION OF THE DEGTJAREFF METHOD FOR DETERMINING SOIL ORGANIC MATTER, AND A PROPOSED MODIFICATION OF THE CHROMIC ACID TITRATION METHOD , 1934 .

[11]  M. Van Meirvenne,et al.  Kriging soil texture under different types of nonstationarity , 2003 .

[12]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  FloSSy: a floating sensing system to evaluate soil variability of flooded paddy fields , 2011 .

[13]  R. Lark,et al.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[14]  Andreas G. Lazari,et al.  Soil electrical conductivity as a function of soil water content and implications for soil mapping , 2006, Precision Agriculture.

[15]  Mohammad M. Islam,et al.  Comparing apparent electrical conductivity measurements on a paddy field under flooded and drained conditions , 2012, Precision Agriculture.

[16]  Jan M. H. Hendrickx,et al.  Noninvasive Soil Water Content Measurement Using Electromagnetic Induction , 1995 .

[17]  J. D. Mcneill.  Electromagnetic Terrain Conduc-tivity Measurement at Low Induction Numbers , 1980 .

[18]  S. Kukal,et al.  Percolation losses of water in relation to pre-puddling tillage and puddling intensity in a puddled sandy loam rice (Oryza sativa L.) field , 2004 .

[19]  M. Mohanty,et al.  Effect of puddling intensity on temporal variation in soil physical conditions and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) in a Vertisol of central India , 2004 .

[20]  R. Reese.  Geostatistics for Environmental Scientists , 2001 .

[21]  J. D. Rhoades,et al.  Soil salinity assessment :methods and interpretation of electrical conductivity measurements , 1999 .

[22]  R. Olea.  Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation By Pierre Goovaerts, Oxford University Press, Applied Geostatistics Series, 1997, 483 p., hardcover, $65 (U.S.), ISBN 0-19-511538-4 , 1999 .

[23]  B. Gill,et al.  Effect of pre-planting tillage on crop yields and weed biomass in a rice-wheat system on a sandy loam soil in Punjab , 1999 .

[24]  E. Brevik,et al.  The Effect of Changes in Bulk Density on Soil Electrical Conductivity as Measured with the Geonics EM‐38 , 2004 .

[25]  H. Brammer.  The geography of the soils of Bangladesh , 1996 .

[26]  Viacheslav I. Adamchuk,et al.  Review: Sensor systems for measuring soil compaction: Review and analysis , 2008 .

[27]  L. Cockx,et al.  Comparing the EM38DD and DUALEM‐21S Sensors for Depth‐to‐Clay Mapping , 2009 .

[28]  Kenneth A. Sudduth,et al.  Sensors for site-specific management. , 1997 .