Moral consideration of nonhumans in the ethics of artificial intelligence

This paper argues that the field of artificial intelligence (AI) ethics needs to give more attention to the values and interests of nonhumans such as other biological species and the AI itself. It documents the extent of current attention to nonhumans in AI ethics as found in academic research, statements of ethics principles, and select projects to design, build, apply, and govern AI. It finds that the field of AI ethics gives limited and inconsistent attention to nonhumans, with the main activity being a line of research on the moral status of AI. The paper argues that nonhumans merit moral consideration, meaning that they should be actively valued for their own sake and not ignored or valued just for how they might benefit humans. Finally, it explains implications of moral consideration of nonhumans for AI ethics research and practice, including for the content of AI ethics principles, the selection of AI projects, the accounting of inadvertent effects of AI systems such as via their resource and energy consumption and potentially certain algorithmic biases, and the research challenge of incorporating nonhuman interests and values into AI system design. The paper does not take positions on which nonhumans to morally consider or how to balance the interests and values of humans vs. nonhumans. Instead, the paper makes the more basic argument that the field of AI ethics should move from its current state of affairs, in which nonhumans are usually ignored, to a state in which nonhumans are given more consistent and extensive moral consideration.

[1]  Kaj Sotala,et al.  Superintelligence As a Cause or Cure For Risks of Astronomical Suffering , 2017, Informatica.

[2]  T. Regan The Case for Animal Rights , 1983 .

[3]  Cathy O'Neil,et al.  Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy , 2016, Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers.

[4]  N. South,et al.  Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide , 2013 .

[5]  S. Sorgner,et al.  Nonconscious Cognitive Suffering: Considering Suffering Risks of Embodied Artificial Intelligence , 2019, Philosophies.

[6]  A. Stibbe Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By , 2015 .

[7]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere , 2002, Ethics and Information Technology.

[8]  Charles S. Cockell,et al.  Originism: Ethics and extraterrestrial life , 2007 .

[9]  Jingyuan Zhang,et al.  Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By (2nd edition) , 2021, Critical Arts.

[10]  O. Johansson-Stenman Methodological and Ideological Options Animal Welfare and Social Decisions : Is It Time to Take Bentham Seriously ? , 2017 .

[11]  S. Noble Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism , 2018 .

[12]  John Danaher,et al.  Welcoming Robots into the Moral Circle: A Defence of Ethical Behaviourism , 2019, Science and Engineering Ethics.

[13]  John F. Haslett,et al.  Making a better case for biodiversity conservation: the BESAFE project , 2018, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  F. P. Hubbard 'Do Androids Dream?': Personhood and Intelligent Artifacts , 2010 .

[15]  Francesca Rossi,et al.  AI4People—An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations , 2018, Minds and Machines.

[16]  Qingfen Fan,et al.  Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By , 2019 .

[17]  Mark Coeckelbergh,et al.  Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration , 2010, Ethics and Information Technology.

[18]  S. Baum A Survey of Artificial General Intelligence Projects for Ethics, Risk, and Policy , 2017 .

[19]  Why conserve biodiversity? A multi-national exploration of stakeholders’ views on the arguments for biodiversity conservation , 2018, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[20]  Stuart Russell Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control , 2019 .

[21]  Holmes Rolston,et al.  Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World , 1987 .

[23]  A. Sen,et al.  Behaviour and the concept of preference , 1971 .

[24]  Safiya Noble,et al.  Algorithms of Oppression , 2018 .

[25]  Amanda Sharkey,et al.  Autonomous weapons systems, killer robots and human dignity , 2018, Ethics and Information Technology.

[26]  Soenke Ziesche,et al.  Towards AI Welfare Science and Policies , 2018, Big Data Cogn. Comput..

[27]  A. Buchanan Human Nature and Enhancement , 2009, Bioethics.

[28]  Andrew McCallum,et al.  Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLP , 2019, ACL.

[29]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  On the Morality of Artificial Agents , 2004, Minds and Machines.

[30]  Anna Jobin,et al.  The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines , 2019, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[31]  Samuel B. Williams,et al.  ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTING MACHINERY , 2000 .

[32]  Paul W. Taylor,et al.  Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics - 25th Anniversary Edition , 2011 .

[33]  B. Bradley Extrinsic Value , 1998 .

[34]  Jason Leigh,et al.  Indigenous Protocol and Artificial Intelligence Position Paper , 2020 .

[35]  M. Lupisella Cosmological Theories of Value: Relationalism and Connectedness as Foundations for Cosmic Creativity , 2016 .

[36]  B. Martín‐López,et al.  Exploring intrinsic, instrumental, and relational values for sustainable management of social-ecological systems , 2017 .

[37]  J. Hutchins The Oxford handbook of ethics of war , 2020 .

[38]  Thomas Conner,et al.  Robot Rights , 2019, New Media Soc..

[39]  S. Baum Value Typology in Cost-Benefit Analysis , 2012 .

[40]  S. Steffensen The microecological grounding of language: How linguistic symbolicity extends and transforms the human ecology , 2018 .

[41]  Kristyn Sommer,et al.  Children's perceptions of the moral worth of live agents, robots, and inanimate objects. , 2019, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[42]  M. Zimmerman,et al.  Recent work on intrinsic value , 2005 .

[43]  J. Horvat THE ETHICS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE , 2016 .

[44]  Barbara C. N. Müller,et al.  Saving the Robot or the Human? Robots Who Feel Deserve Moral Care , 2019, Social Cognition.

[45]  Stanley Shostak,et al.  Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics , 2013, International Dialogue.

[46]  Eugene C. Hargrove Beyond Spaceship Earth: Environmental Ethics and the Solar System, Eugene C. Hargrove. 1987. Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, CA. 288 pages. Index. ISBN: 0-87156-768-7. $25.00 , 1987 .

[47]  R. Garner A Theory of Justice for Animals: Animal Rights in a Nonideal World , 2013 .

[48]  David Arnold Ecological ethics: an introduction , 2013 .

[49]  Ellen P. Goodman Smart City Ethics: The Challenge to Democratic Governance in the Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI (edited by Markus D. Dubber, Frank Pasquale, and Sunit Das) , 2020, The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI.

[50]  Jon Hutton,et al.  People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation , 2007 .

[51]  H. Jonas The phenomenon of life: toward a philosophical biology , 1966 .

[52]  Eliezer Yudkowsky,et al.  The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence , 2014, Artificial Intelligence Safety and Security.

[53]  P. Singer,et al.  Animal Liberation: towards an end to man's inhumanity to animals , 1983 .

[54]  Suzanne Kite,et al.  Making Kin with the Machines , 2018, Journal of Design and Science.

[55]  J. B. Callicott In defense of the land ethic: essays in environmental philosophy , 1989 .

[56]  Seth D. Baum,et al.  Universalist Ethics in Extraterrestrial Encounter , 2010 .

[57]  Holmes Rolston,et al.  The Preservation of Natural Value in the Solar System , 2007 .

[58]  Seth D. Baum,et al.  Social choice ethics in artificial intelligence , 2017, AI & SOCIETY.

[59]  N. Hanley,et al.  On the functional relationship between biodiversity and economic value , 2020, Science Advances.

[60]  Qian Liu,et al.  Optimizing the Energy Consumption of Spiking Neural Networks for Neuromorphic Applications , 2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience.

[61]  T. Morton Dark Ecology: For a Logic of Future Coexistence , 2016 .