Pseudoprogression in Patients With Glioblastoma Multiforme After Concurrent Radiotherapy and Temozolomide

BackgroundTo evaluate pathologically confirmed incidence of pseudoprogression and its impact on survival in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients treated with radiotherapy and concurrent temozolomide (TMZ), followed by 6 months of TMZ maintenance therapy. Materials and MethodsSixty-three patients with histologic proof of GBM underwent 60 Gy (2 Gy/fr, 30 fractions) of brain radiotherapy concurrent with continuous 75 mg/m2/d TMZ, followed by 6 cycles of maintenance TMZ (200 mg/m2/d for 5 d, every 28 d). Response assessment was performed by magnetic resonance imaging every 2 months. All patients with radiologic doubt of early tumor progression (⩽6 mo) underwent salvage surgery. ResultsAll patients underwent surgical resection. Gross total, subtotal resection, and biopsy were performed in 17 (27.0%), 32 (51.6%), and 14 (21.4%) patients, respectively. Lesion enlargement on first follow-up magnetic resonance imaging evidenced in 28 (44.4%) patients. Salvage pathologies revealed pseudoprogression in 12 of 28 (42.8%) patients corresponding to an overall pseudoprogression rate of 19%. Survival analysis revealed that patients with pseudoprogression had superior overall and progression-free survival rates at both 1 and 2 years (P<0.05 for each, respectively). ConclusionsCurrent results indicates the urgency of need for novel imaging techniques and/or biochemical marker(s) that can better distinguish pseudoprogression from true progression to avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful surgical interventions in almost half of the radiologically progressive GBM patients. Our additional observation which suggests better survival for patients with pseudoprogression warrants to be studied in larger patient cohorts.

[1]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  A. Brandes,et al.  MGMT promoter methylation status can predict the incidence and outcome of pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  Ramazan Yildiz,et al.  Radiation induced early necrosis in patients with malignant gliomas receiving temozolomide , 2010, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[4]  V. Levin,et al.  Evaluation of malignant glioma patients during the postirradiation period. , 1979, Journal of neurosurgery.

[5]  Bart Neyns,et al.  Pseudoprogression after radiotherapy with concurrent temozolomide for high-grade glioma: clinical observations and working recommendations. , 2009, Surgical neurology.

[6]  T. Cascino,et al.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  William D Rooney,et al.  Potential for differentiation of pseudoprogression from true tumor progression with dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using ferumoxytol vs. gadoteridol: a pilot study. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  J. Grau,et al.  Radiotherapy of the brain in elderly patients , 2000 .

[9]  A. Sahgal,et al.  Pseudoprogression Following Chemoradiotherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2010, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[10]  Hyun-Cheol Kang,et al.  Pseudoprogression in patients with malignant gliomas treated with concurrent temozolomide and radiotherapy: potential role of p53 , 2011, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[11]  P. Pytel,et al.  Update on diagnostic practice: tumors of the nervous system. , 2009, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[12]  Timothy D Johnson,et al.  Parametric response map as an imaging biomarker to distinguish progression from pseudoprogression in high-grade glioma. , 2010, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[13]  K. Aldape,et al.  Temozolomide-Mediated Radiation Enhancement in Glioblastoma: A Report on Underlying Mechanisms , 2006, Clinical Cancer Research.

[14]  N. Burnet,et al.  Interpretation of Early Imaging after Concurrent Radiotherapy and Temozolomide for Glioblastoma , 2007 .

[15]  R. Mirimanoff,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial. , 2009, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  M. J. van den Bent,et al.  Immediate post-radiotherapy changes in malignant glioma can mimic tumor progression , 2004, Neurology.

[17]  Dieta Brandsma,et al.  Incidence of early pseudo‐progression in a cohort of malignant glioma patients treated with chemoirradiation with temozolomide , 2008, Cancer.

[18]  Andrew E. Sloan,et al.  Early necrosis following concurrent Temodar and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma , 2007, Journal of Neuro-Oncology.

[19]  L. Deangelis,et al.  Radiation‐induced dementia in patients cured of brain metastases , 1989, Neurology.

[20]  F. Cognetti,et al.  Pseudoprogression and MGMT status in glioblastoma patients: implications in clinical practice. , 2009, Anticancer research.

[21]  J. Cairncross,et al.  Population-Based Study of Pseudoprogression after Chemoradiotherapy in GBM , 2009, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[22]  Reto Meuli,et al.  Promising survival for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme treated with concomitant radiation plus temozolomide followed by adjuvant temozolomide. , 2002, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.