Stratification of Patients With Liver Fibrosis Using Dual-Energy CT

Assessing the severity of liver fibrosis has direct clinical implications for patient diagnosis and treatment. Liver biopsy, typically considered the gold standard, has limited clinical utility due to its invasiveness. Therefore, several imaging-based techniques for staging liver fibrosis have emerged, such as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and ultrasound elastography (USE), but they face challenges that include limited availability, high cost, poor patient compliance, low repeatability, and inaccuracy. Computed tomography (CT) can address many of these limitations, but is still hampered by inaccuracy in the presence of confounding factors, such as liver fat. Dual-energy CT (DECT), with its ability to discriminate between different tissue types, may offer a viable alternative to these methods. By combining the "multi-material decomposition" (MMD) algorithm with a biologically driven hypothesis we developed a method for assessing liver fibrosis from DECT images. On a twelve-patient cohort the method produced quantitative maps showing the spatial distribution of liver fibrosis, as well as a fibrosis score for each patient with statistically significant correlation with the severity of fibrosis across a wide range of disease severities. A preliminary comparison of the proposed algorithm against MRE showed good agreement between the two methods. Finally, the application of the algorithm to longitudinal DECT scans of the cohort produced highly repeatable results. We conclude that our algorithm can successfully stratify patients with liver fibrosis and can serve to supplement and augment current clinical practice and the role of DECT imaging in staging liver fibrosis.

[1]  H. Coxeter,et al.  Introduction to Geometry , 1964, The Mathematical Gazette.

[2]  R. Alvarez,et al.  A Comparison of Noise and Dose in Conventional and Energy Selective Computed Tomography , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[3]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[4]  R. Cloutier Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[5]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[6]  K. Ishak,et al.  Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. , 1995 .

[7]  J. H. Hubbell,et al.  Tables of X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients and Mass Energy-Absorption Coefficients 1 keV to 20 MeV for Elements Z = 1 to 92 and 48 Additional Substances of Dosimetric Interest , 1995 .

[8]  Keith J. Worsley,et al.  The Geometry of Random Images , 1996 .

[9]  Xucai Chen,et al.  A mathematical model for the assessment of hemodynamic parameters using quantitative contrast echocardiography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  B. I. Choi,et al.  Hepatic abnormalities related to blood flow: evaluation with dual-phase helical CT , 1999, Abdominal Imaging.

[11]  R. Semelka,et al.  Chronic hepatitis: Correlation of early patchy and late linear enhancement patterns on gadolinium‐enhanced MR images with histopathology initial experience , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  Hyun Cheol Kim,et al.  CT during hepatic arteriography and portography: an illustrative review. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[13]  J. Marrero,et al.  NAFLD may be a common underlying liver disease in patients with hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States , 2002, Hepatology.

[14]  B. Choi,et al.  Hepatic Arterioportal Shunts: Dynamic CT and MR Features , 2002, Korean journal of radiology.

[15]  B. Wang,et al.  Quantitative diagnosis of fatty liver with dual-energy CT: An experimental study in rabbits , 2003, Acta radiologica.

[16]  H. Shan,et al.  Study on hepatocellular carcinoma-associated hepatic arteriovenous shunt using multidetector CT. , 2003, World journal of gastroenterology.

[17]  D. Breen,et al.  Intrahepatic arterioportal shunting and anomalous venous drainage: understanding the CT features in the liver , 2004, European Radiology.

[18]  H. Rusinek,et al.  Perfusion imaging of the liver: current challenges and future goals. , 2005, Radiology.

[19]  R. Bataller,et al.  Amendment history : Corrigendum ( April 2005 ) Liver fibrosis Ramón Bataller , 2018 .

[20]  D. Brenner,et al.  Erratum: Liver fibrosis (Journal of Clinical Investigation (2005) 115 (209-218) DOI:10.1172/JCI200524282) , 2005 .

[21]  R. Standish,et al.  An appraisal of the histopathological assessment of liver fibrosis , 2006, Gut.

[22]  Y. Takeda,et al.  Assessment of the severity of liver disease and fibrotic change: the usefulness of hepatic CT perfusion imaging. , 2006, Oncology reports.

[23]  S. Curley,et al.  Comparison of CT methods for determining the fat content of the liver. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[24]  R. Sörensen,et al.  Differential diagnosis of early opacification of the portal vein and its tributaries during arteriography , 1978, Cardiovascular radiology.

[25]  H. Rusinek,et al.  Advanced liver fibrosis: diagnosis with 3D whole-liver perfusion MR imaging--initial experience. , 2008, Radiology.

[26]  J. Schlomka,et al.  Experimental feasibility of multi-energy photon-counting K-edge imaging in pre-clinical computed tomography , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Pre-reconstruction three-material decomposition in dual-energy CT , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[28]  C. McCollough,et al.  Quantitative imaging of element composition and mass fraction using dual-energy CT: three-material decomposition. , 2009, Medical physics.

[29]  F. Schick,et al.  Non-invasive assessment and quantification of liver steatosis by ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance. , 2009, Journal of hepatology.

[30]  S. Altekruse,et al.  Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  G. Casola,et al.  MR imaging of liver fibrosis: current state of the art. , 2009, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[32]  R. Nelson,et al.  Dual-energy multidetector CT: how does it work, what can it tell us, and when can we use it in abdominopelvic imaging? , 2010, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[33]  G. Baron,et al.  Liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: differentiating minimal from intermediate fibrosis with perfusion CT. , 2010, Radiology.

[34]  A. Act Noninvasive tests for liver disease, fibrosis, and cirrhosis: Is liver biopsy obsolete? , 2010 .

[35]  F. Sanai,et al.  Liver Biopsy for Histological Assessment – The Case Against , 2010, Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association.

[36]  Paulo R. S. Mendonça,et al.  Multi-material decomposition of spectral CT images , 2010, Medical Imaging.

[37]  B. Hamm,et al.  Viscoelasticity-based staging of hepatic fibrosis with multifrequency MR elastography. , 2010, Radiology.

[38]  Alvin C. Silva,et al.  Dual-energy (spectral) CT: applications in abdominal imaging. , 2011, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[39]  R. Ehman,et al.  Early detection of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease by using MR elastography. , 2011, Radiology.

[40]  A. Manduca,et al.  Dynamic postprandial hepatic stiffness augmentation assessed with MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[41]  Sabrina Fox‐Bosetti,et al.  Test–retest repeatability of MR elastography for noninvasive liver fibrosis assessment in hepatitis C , 2011, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[42]  S. Molloi,et al.  Segmentation and quantification of materials with energy discriminating computed tomography: a phantom study. , 2010, Medical physics.

[43]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  fMRI-Based Hierarchical SVM Model for the Classification and Grading of Liver Fibrosis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  J. Boone,et al.  Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations , 2011 .

[45]  J. Bruix,et al.  Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: An update , 2011, Hepatology.

[46]  K. Patel,et al.  Recent advances in imaging hepatic fibrosis and steatosis , 2011, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[47]  S. Coulon,et al.  Angiogenesis in chronic liver disease and its complications , 2011, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[48]  J. Fallowfield,et al.  Pathogenesis and treatment of hepatic fibrosis: is cirrhosis reversible? , 2011, Clinical medicine.

[49]  Ke-min Chen,et al.  Spectral CT: Preliminary Studies in the Liver Cirrhosis , 2012, Korean journal of radiology.

[50]  E. Godfrey,et al.  A comparison of MR elastography and 31P MR spectroscopy with histological staging of liver fibrosis , 2012, European Radiology.

[51]  P. Hoskins,et al.  Current state of ultrasound elastography , 2012 .

[52]  G. Ferraioli,et al.  Accuracy of real‐time shear wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: A pilot study , 2012, Hepatology.

[53]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  Hyperintense HCC on hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: correlation with clinical and pathological features. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[54]  A. Szymczak,et al.  Safety and Effectiveness of Blind Percutaneous Liver Biopsy: Analysis of 1412 Procedures , 2012, Hepatitis monthly.

[55]  U. Motosugi,et al.  Liver stiffness measured by magnetic resonance elastography as a risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma: a preliminary case–control study , 2012, European Radiology.

[56]  J. Fessler,et al.  Multi-Material Decomposition Using Statistical Image Reconstruction in X-Ray CT , 2012 .

[57]  B. Bolster,et al.  Accuracy of MR elastography and anatomic MR imaging features in the diagnosis of severe hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[58]  U. Motosugi,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography as a Predictor of Insufficient Liver Enhancement on Gadoxetic Acid–Enhanced Hepatocyte-Phase Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Type C Hepatitis and Child-Pugh Class A Disease , 2012, Investigative radiology.

[59]  Xiao-Ping Ye,et al.  Liver and Spleen Stiffness Measured by Acoustic Radiation Force Impulse Elastography for Noninvasive Assessment of Liver Fibrosis and Esophageal Varices in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B , 2012, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[60]  G. Sangster,et al.  MDCT Imaging Findings of Liver Cirrhosis: Spectrum of Hepatic and Extrahepatic Abdominal Complications , 2013, HPB surgery : a world journal of hepatic, pancreatic and biliary surgery.

[61]  X. Cui,et al.  Liver elastography, comments on EFSUMB elastography guidelines 2013. , 2013, World journal of gastroenterology.

[62]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver: Technique, analysis, and clinical applications , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[63]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2013 , 2013, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[64]  Paulo R. S. Mendonça,et al.  A Flexible Method for Multi-Material Decomposition of Dual-Energy CT Images , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[65]  R. Ehman,et al.  Magnetic resonance elastography of liver. , 2014, Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America.