Chapter 8: Plasma operation and control

The ITER plasma control system has the same functional scope as the control systems in present tokamaks. These are plasma operation scenario sequencing, plasma basic control (magnetic and kinetic), plasma advanced control (control of RWMs, NTMs, ELMs, error fields, etc) and plasma fast shutdown. This chapter considers only plasma initiation and plasma basic control. This chapter describes the progress achieved in these areas in the tokamak experiments since the ITER Physics Basis (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2577) was written and the results of assessment of ITER to provide the plasma initiation and basic control. This assessment was done for the present ITER design (15 MA machine) at a more detailed level than it was done for the ITER design 1998 (21 MA machine) described in the ITER Physics Basis (1999 Nucl. Fusion 39 2577). The experiments on plasma initiation performed in DIII-D and JT-60U, as well as the theoretical studies performed for ITER, have demonstrated that, within specified assumptions on the plasma confinement and the impurity influx, ITER can produce plasma initiation in a low toroidal electric field (0.3 V m−1), if it is assisted by about 2 MW of ECRF heating. The plasma basic control includes control of the plasma current, position and shape—the plasma magnetic control, as well as control of other plasma global parameters or their profiles—the plasma performance control. The magnetic control is based on more reliable and simpler models of the control objects than those available at present for the plasma kinetic control. Moreover the real time diagnostics used for the magnetic control in many cases are more precise than those used for the kinetic control. Because of these reasons, the plasma magnetic control was developed for modern tokamaks and assessed for ITER better than the kinetic control. However, significant progress has been achieved in the plasma performance control during the last few years. Although the physics basis of plasma operation and control is similar in ITER and present tokamaks, there is a principal qualitative difference. To minimize its cost, ITER has been designed with small margins in many plasma and engineering parameters. These small margins result in a significantly narrower operational space compared with present tokamaks. Furthermore, ITER operation is expensive and component damage resulting from purely operational errors might lead to a high and avoidable repair cost. These factors make it judicious to use validated plasma diagnostics and employ simulators to ‘pre-test’ the combined ITER operation and control systems. Understanding of how to do this type of pre-test validation is now developed in present day experiments. This research push should provide us with fully functional simulators before the first ITER operation.

[1]  E. Joffrin,et al.  Chapter 6: Steady state operation , 2007 .

[2]  J. Manickam,et al.  Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 2007 .

[3]  Shuichi Takamura,et al.  Chapter 4: Power and particle control , 2007 .

[4]  T. Fujita,et al.  Chapter 2: Plasma confinement and transport , 2007 .

[5]  K. Ikeda Progress in the ITER Physics Basis , 2007 .

[6]  A. Polevoi,et al.  Chapter 1: Overview and summary , 2007 .

[7]  Didier Mazon,et al.  Feedback control of the safety factor profile evolution during formation of an advanced tokamak discharge , 2006 .

[8]  C. Kessel,et al.  Control of plasma profiles in DIII-D discharges , 2006 .

[9]  J. Weiland,et al.  Density and temperature profile modifications with electron cyclotron power injection in quiescent double barrier discharges on DIII-D , 2005 .

[10]  T. C. Luce,et al.  Development of burning plasma and advanced scenarios in the DIII-D tokamak , 2005 .

[11]  T. Oikawa,et al.  Electron cyclotron heating assisted startup in JT-60U , 2005 .

[12]  R. Budny,et al.  The ‘hybrid’ scenario in JET: towards its validation for ITER , 2005 .

[13]  A. Manini,et al.  The improved H-mode at ASDEX Upgrade: a candidate for an ITER hybrid scenario , 2005 .

[14]  R. R. Khayrutdinov,et al.  Simulations of ITER scenarios , 2005 .

[15]  V. M. Leonov,et al.  Simulation of high-Z impurity behaviour for ITER operational scenarios using the ZIMPUR impurity code , 2005 .

[16]  R. Albanese,et al.  Development of real-time diagnostics and feedback algorithms for JET in view of the next step , 2004, physics/0410101.

[17]  B. G. Penaflor,et al.  Current status of the upgraded DIII-D real-time digital plasma control system , 2004 .

[18]  L. Giannone,et al.  Regime identification in ASDEX Upgrade , 2004 .

[19]  Olivier Sauter,et al.  Integrated scenario in JET using real-time profile control , 2003 .

[20]  J. Stober,et al.  Dependence of particle transport on heating profiles in ASDEX Upgrade , 2003 .

[21]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  Model Validation, Dynamic Edge Localized Mode Discrimination and High Confidence Resistive Wall Mode Control in DIII-D , 2003 .

[22]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Upgrade of the present JET shape and vertical stability controller , 2003 .

[23]  Filippo Sartori,et al.  JET real-time object-oriented code for plasma boundary reconstruction , 2003 .

[24]  A. Cenedese,et al.  Neutral point detection in JET , 2003 .

[25]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Real-time control of the q-profile in JET for steady state advanced tokamak operation , 2003 .

[26]  Massimiliano Mattei,et al.  Plasma Response Models for Current, Shape and Position Control in Jet , 2003 .

[27]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A new shape controller for extremely shaped plasmas in JET , 2003 .

[28]  V. Belyakov,et al.  Plasma initiation stage analysis in tokamaks with TRANSMAK code , 2003 .

[29]  P. J. Lomas,et al.  n=2 Compensation and variable gains for JET vertical stabilisation , 2003 .

[30]  K. Burrell Overview of recent experimental results from the DIII-D advanced tokamak program , 2002 .

[31]  P. C. de Vries,et al.  Towards the realization on JET of an integrated H-mode scenario for ITER , 2002 .

[32]  Yasunori Kawano,et al.  Advanced Real-Time Feedback Control in JT-60U High Performance Discharges for Application to Fusion Reactor Plasmas , 2002 .

[33]  S. Jardin,et al.  Axisymmetric disruption dynamics including current profile changes in the ASDEX-Upgrade tokamak , 2002 .

[34]  R. Felton,et al.  Real-time control of internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[35]  J. Lister,et al.  Plasma equilibrium response modelling and validation on JT-60U , 2002 .

[36]  Y. R. Martin,et al.  Extension of the TCV operating space towards higher elongation and higher normalized current , 2002 .

[37]  X. Litaudon,et al.  A dimensionless criterion for characterizing internal transport barriers in JET , 2002 .

[38]  J. Lister,et al.  Comparing TCV experimental VDE responses with DINA code simulations , 2002 .

[39]  D. A. Humphreys,et al.  CONTROL OF NEOCLASSICAL TEARING MODES IN DIII-D , 2001 .

[40]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Comparing DINA code simulations with TCV experimental plasma equilibrium responses , 2001 .

[41]  K. Kurihara,et al.  A new shape reproduction method based on the cauchy-condition surface for real-time tokamak reactor control , 2000 .

[42]  J. Lister,et al.  Technical issues associated with the control of steady state tokamaks , 2000 .

[43]  F. Saint-Laurent,et al.  Steady state operation and control experiments on Tore Supra , 2000 .

[44]  Jt Team,et al.  High performance and prospects for steady state operation on JT-60U , 2000 .

[45]  Y. R. Martin,et al.  Vertical position control in TCV: comparison of model predictions with experimental results , 2000 .

[46]  CurrentDrive,et al.  Chapter?8: Plasma operation and control , 1999 .

[47]  Plasma Chapter 3: MHD stability, operational limits and disruptions , 1999 .

[48]  T. Fukuda,et al.  Active feedback control of steady-state improved confinement discharges in JT-60U , 1999 .

[49]  J. A. Leuer,et al.  Development of a closed loop simulator for poloidal field control in DIII-D , 1999, 18th IEEE/NPSS Symposium on Fusion Engineering. Symposium Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH37050).

[50]  A. Sips,et al.  MHD stability of optimized shear discharges in JET , 1999 .

[51]  J. Lister,et al.  Measurement of the open loop plasma equilibrium response in TCV , 1999 .

[52]  W. Kerner,et al.  Plasma confinement in JET H?mode plasmas with H, D, DT and T isotopes , 1999 .

[53]  Kenichi Kurihara Current Profile Reproduction Study on the Basis of a New Expansion Method with the Eigenfunctions Defined in the Tokamak Plasma Interior , 1998 .

[54]  S. Sakata,et al.  Feedback control of radiation region in radiative divertor plasma on JT-60U tokamak , 1998 .

[55]  L. L. Lao,et al.  Real time equilibrium reconstruction for tokamak discharge control , 1998 .

[56]  D. Humphreys,et al.  Using a multipole expansion for startup in the DIII-D tokamak , 1998 .

[57]  R. Albanese,et al.  The linearized CREATE-L plasma response model for the control of current, position and shape in tokamaks , 1998 .

[58]  S. Sakata,et al.  Feedback control of neutron emission rate in JT-60U , 1997 .

[59]  T. W. Petrie,et al.  Impurity feedback control for enhanced divertor and edge radiation in DIII-D discharges , 1997 .

[60]  T. Wijnands,et al.  LETTER: Feedback control during long pulse operation of Tore Supra , 1996 .

[61]  V. Erckmann,et al.  Electron cyclotron resonance heating and current drive in toroidal fusion plasmas , 1994 .

[62]  P. H. Rebut,et al.  The ITER challenge , 1993 .

[63]  K. Kurihara,et al.  Tokamak plasma shape identification on the basis of boundary integral equations , 1993 .

[64]  J. Lingertat,et al.  Local expansion method for fast plasma boundary identification in JET , 1993 .

[65]  K. Kurihara Eddy current effect study on the JT-60 plasma equilibrium control , 1992 .

[66]  E. A. Lazarus,et al.  Low voltage Ohmic and electron cyclotron heating assisted startup in DIII-D , 1991 .

[67]  S. Jardin,et al.  Dynamic modeling of transport and positional control of tokamaks , 1986 .

[68]  Alfredo Pironti,et al.  A model-based technique for integrated real-time profile control in the JET tokamak , 2004 .

[69]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Enhancing tokamak control given power supply voltage saturation , 2003 .

[70]  J. B. Lister,et al.  Plasma Current, Position and Shape Control, Contract FU05-CT2001-00018 (EFDA/00-551) , 2002 .

[71]  Ivo Furno,et al.  Effect of ELMs on the measurement of vertical plasma position in TCV , 2000 .

[72]  Ryuji Yoshino,et al.  Low electric field plasma-current start-up in JT-60U , 1997 .

[73]  M. Z. Tokar,et al.  TRANSPORT AND IMPROVED CONFINEMENT IN HIGH POWER EDGE RADIATION COOLING EXPERIMENTS ON TEXTOR , 1996 .

[74]  C. Challis,et al.  The optimization of neutral beams for ignition and burn control on next-step reactors , 1995 .

[75]  P. Noll,et al.  Start-up of the Ohmic Phase in JET , 1986 .