Demographic stochasticity reduces the synchronizing effect of dispersal in predator-prey metapopulations.

Dispersal may affect predator-prey metapopulations by rescuing local sink populations from extinction or by synchronizing population dynamics across the metapopulation, increasing the risk of regional extinction. Dispersal is likely influenced by demographic stochasticity, however, particularly because dispersal rates are often very low in metapopulations. Yet the effects of demographic stochasticity on predator-prey metapopulations are not well known. To that end, I constructed three models of a two-patch predator-prey system. The models constitute a hierarchy of complexity, allowing direct comparisons. Two models included demographic stochasticity (pure jump process [PJP] and stochastic differential equations [SDE]), and the third was deterministic (ordinary differential equations [ODE]). One stochastic model (PJP) treated population sizes as discrete, while the other (SDE) allowed population sizes to change continuously. Both stochastic models only produced synchronized predator-prey dynamics when dispersal was high for both trophic levels. Frequent dispersal by only predators or prey in the PJP and SDE spatially decoupled the trophic interaction, reducing synchrony of the non-dispersive species. Conversely, the ODE generated synchronized predator-prey dynamics across all dispersal rates, except when initial conditions produced anti-phase transients. These results indicate that demographic stochasticity strongly reduces the synchronizing effect of dispersal, which is ironic because demographic stochasticity is often invoked post hoc as a driver of extinctions in synchronized metapopulations.

[1]  L. Allen An introduction to stochastic processes with applications to biology , 2003 .

[2]  Mario Pineda-Krch,et al.  GillespieSSA: Implementing the Gillespie Stochastic Simulation Algorithm in R , 2008 .

[3]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Spatial population dynamics: analyzing patterns and processes of population synchrony. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[4]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  A tale of two cycles – distinguishing quasi-cycles and limit cycles in finite predator–prey populations , 2007 .

[5]  Andrew M. Liebhold,et al.  Spatial Synchrony in Population Dynamics , 2004 .

[6]  V. Jansen,et al.  Phase locking: another cause of synchronicity in predator-prey systems. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[7]  James H. Brown,et al.  Turnover Rates in Insular Biogeography: Effect of Immigration on Extinction , 1977 .

[8]  A. Hastings Transient dynamics and persistence of ecological systems , 2001 .

[9]  T. Kurtz Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump markov processes , 1970, Journal of Applied Probability.

[10]  T. Kurtz Strong approximation theorems for density dependent Markov chains , 1978 .

[11]  V. Wolters,et al.  The Effects of Spatial Scale on Trophic Interactions , 2005, Ecosystems.

[12]  R. Holt Predation, apparent competition, and the structure of prey communities. , 1977, Theoretical population biology.

[13]  J. Fox,et al.  Phase-locking and environmental fluctuations generate synchrony in a predator–prey community , 2009, Nature.

[14]  A. Hastings,et al.  Demographic and environmental stochasticity in predator–prey metapopulation dynamics , 2004 .

[15]  D. Earn,et al.  Coherence and conservation. , 2000, Science.

[16]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Predator-Prey Theory and Variability , 1978 .

[17]  Allan Stewart-Oaten,et al.  Aggregation and Stability in Metapopulation Models , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[18]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[19]  R. Macarthur,et al.  Graphical Representation and Stability Conditions of Predator-Prey Interactions , 1963, The American Naturalist.