Assessing Group Decision Support Systems for Emergency Response Using Gaming Simulation

In very low-frequency, high-consequence events such as earthquakes or those resulting from malfunctions at commercial nuclear power generating facilities, a group or individual’s prior experience with crisis events will certainly influence judgments and behavior. Written plans and procedures have been shown to serve valuable purposes in training new organizations, individuals, and public officials for responding to these events. It has been demonstrated repeatedly that when emergency operations are conducted in accordance with existing plans, reaction time is reduced and coordination is improved, with fewer casualties and reduced economic damage as results. Such plans and procedures provide a normative model for simulation scenarios in the context of education and training activities. Simulations can also provide a field laboratory for evaluation of new technologies for training in operational decisionmaking. The purpose of this paper is to report on the design and use of a gaming simulation as a means of assessing one group decision support system (GDSS) for emergency response. The paper reviews related past work and focuses on our recent experience in conducting quasi-experiments to assess Emergency Management imPROViser (EMPROV), a GDSS for improvisation in emergency response operations. The process of designing a gaming simulation, determining the experimental protocol and coordinating the gaming sessions with emergency response personnel from the Port of Rotterdam will be described. Finally, the paper concludes with suggestions on how to improve the benefit of gaming simulations for training and operations.

[1]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  An expert system for maritime pilots: its design and assessment using gaming , 1993 .

[2]  William A. Wallace,et al.  "We were always re-organizing...": some crisis management implications of the Exxon Valdez oil spill , 1992 .

[3]  William A. Wallace,et al.  SIMULATION OF A CRISIS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION NETWORK: A SERENDIPITOUS EVALUATION , 1983 .

[4]  E. Salas,et al.  The science of training: a decade of progress. , 2001, Annual review of psychology.

[5]  Beroggi.  Operational Sustainability Management for the Infrastructure : The Case of Emergency Response * , 2003 .

[6]  Christine Moorman,et al.  The Convergence of Planning and Execution: Improvisation in New Product Development , 1998 .

[7]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Intelligent Interface Design: An Empirical Assessment of Knowledge Presentation in Expert Systems , 1990, MIS Q..

[8]  W. Wallace,et al.  Decision Support Systems for Disaster Management , 1985 .

[9]  David L. Tate,et al.  Using Virtual Environments to Train Firefighters , 1997, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[10]  David Mendonça,et al.  Decision support for improvisation during emergency response operations , 2001 .

[11]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Operational control of the transportation of hazardous materials: an assessment of alternative decision models , 1995 .

[12]  K. R. Hammond.  Judgments Under Stress , 1999 .

[13]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  The relationship between three-dimensional imaging and group decision making: an exploratory study , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[14]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Operational Risk Management: The Integration of Decision, Communications, and Multimedia Technologies , 1998 .

[15]  Kirk R. Karwan,et al.  An investigation of system design considerations for emergency management decision support , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[16]  William A. Wallace,et al.  Employing virtual reality to support decision making in emergency management , 1995 .