Intra-dance variation among waggle runs and the design of efficient protocols for honey bee dance decoding

Summary Noise is universal in information transfer. In animal communication, this presents a challenge not only for intended signal receivers, but also to biologists studying the system. In honey bees, a forager communicates to nestmates the location of an important resource via the waggle dance. This vibrational signal is composed of repeating units (waggle runs) that are then averaged by nestmates to derive a single vector. Manual dance decoding is a powerful tool for studying bee foraging ecology, although the process is time-consuming: a forager may repeat the waggle run 1- >100 times within a dance. It is impractical to decode all of these to obtain the vector; however, intra-dance waggle runs vary, so it is important to decode enough to obtain a good average. Here we examine the variation among waggle runs made by foraging bees to devise a method of dance decoding. The first and last waggle runs within a dance are significantly more variable than the middle run. There was no trend in variation for the middle waggle runs. We recommend that any four consecutive waggle runs, not including the first and last runs, may be decoded, and we show that this methodology is suitable by demonstrating the goodness-of-fit between the decoded vectors from our subsamples with the vectors from the entire dances.

[1]  Scott A. Shaffer,et al.  Perspectives in Ornithology: Application of tracking and data-logging technology in research and conservation of seabirds , 2009 .

[2]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Honeybee foragers increase the use of waggle dance information when private information becomes unrewarding , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Martin Wikelski,et al.  Going wild: what a global small-animal tracking system could do for experimental biologists , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[4]  T. Seeley The Wisdom of the Hive: The Social Physiology of Honey Bee Colonies , 1995 .

[5]  F. Ratnieks,et al.  Long-range foraging by the honey-bee, Apis mellifera L. , 2000 .

[6]  R. Morse The Dance Language and Orientation of Bees , 1994 .

[7]  M. Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee Odometry: Performance in Varying Natural Terrain , 2004, PLoS biology.

[8]  David J. T. Sumpter,et al.  Comparing foraging behaviour of small and large honey‐bee colonies by decoding waggle dances made by foragers , 2004 .

[9]  M. J. Couvillon The dance legacy of Karl von Frisch , 2012, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  William F. Towne,et al.  The spatial precision of the honey bees' dance communication , 1988, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[11]  K. Frisch,et al.  Über den Schwänzeltanz der Bienen , 1957, Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie.

[12]  John P. Miller,et al.  Broadband neural encoding in the cricket cereal sensory system enhanced by stochastic resonance , 1996, Nature.

[13]  Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter,et al.  Honeybee foraging in differentially structured landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  F. Dyer The biology of the dance language. , 2002, Annual review of entomology.

[15]  G. Dell’Omo,et al.  Finding home: the final step of the pigeons' homing process studied with a GPS data logger , 2007, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[16]  A. Dornhaus,et al.  Why do honey bees dance? , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[17]  F. Cagnacci,et al.  Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[18]  W. Kirchner,et al.  How honeybees perceive communication dances, studied by means of a mechanical model , 1992, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[19]  T. Seeley,et al.  FORAGING STRATEGY OF HONEYBEE COLONIES IN A TEMPERATE DECIDUOUS FOREST , 1982 .

[20]  P. Kirk Visscher,et al.  Does Imprecision in The Waggle Dance Fit Patterns Predicted by The Tuned-Error Hypothesis? , 2010, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[21]  M. Beekman,et al.  Increase in dance imprecision with decreasing foraging distance in the honey bee Apis mellifera L. is partly explained by physical constraints , 2005, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[22]  P. Visscher,et al.  Do honey bees average directions in the waggle dance to determine a flight direction? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  Thomas J. Herbert,et al.  Comparisons of forager distributions from matched honey bee colonies in suburban environments , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  T. Seeley,et al.  Group decision making in nest-site selection by honey bees , 2004 .

[25]  Charles M. Bishop,et al.  Novel GPS tracking of sea turtles as a tool for conservation management , 2007 .

[26]  M V Srinivasan,et al.  Honeybee navigation: nature and calibration of the "odometer". , 2000, Science.

[27]  R. Menzel,et al.  The flight paths of honeybees recruited by the waggle dance , 2005, Nature.

[28]  R. Johnstone,et al.  Animal signals , 2013, Current Biology.

[29]  R. Menzel,et al.  A Common Frame of Reference for Learned and Communicated Vectors in Honeybee Navigation , 2011, Current Biology.

[30]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Satellite tracking of Wandering albatrosses , 1990, Nature.

[31]  W. Kirchner,et al.  Honeybee dance communication , 1988, Naturwissenschaften.

[32]  T. Seeley,et al.  Hypotheses on the adaptiveness or non-adaptiveness of the directional imprecision in the Honey Bee's Waggle Dance (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Apis mellifera) , 2007 .

[33]  Mandyam V Srinivasan,et al.  Floral scents induce recall of navigational and visual memories in honeybees , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[34]  Thomas D. Seeley,et al.  Imprecision in waggle dances of the honeybee (Apis mellifera) for nearby food sources: error or adaptation? , 1999, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[35]  A. Kacelnik,et al.  Video Cameras on Wild Birds , 2007, Science.

[36]  D. Tanner,et al.  Does the body orientation of waggle dance followers affect the accuracy of recruitment? , 2011, Apidologie.

[37]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[38]  Karl von Frisch,et al.  Die Tänze der Bienen , 1965 .

[39]  A. Dussutour,et al.  Noise improves collective decision-making by ants in dynamic environments , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  P. Kirk Visscher,et al.  Adaptation or constraint? Reference-dependent scatter in honey bee dances , 2010, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  Lars Chittka,et al.  The spectral input to honeybee visual odometry , 2003, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[42]  T. Seeley,et al.  Dancing bees tune both duration and rate of waggle-run production in relation to nectar-source profitability , 2000, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[43]  Shaowu Zhang,et al.  Honeybee dances communicate distances measured by optic flow , 2001, Nature.

[44]  Randolf Menzel,et al.  Variability in the encoding of spatial information by dancing bees , 2008, Journal of Experimental Biology.