Partition-based bus renumbering effect on interior point-based OPF solution

The form of constraint coefficient matrix of an optimization problem significantly affects the solution procedure for finding the optimal results, especially when iterative algorithms are implemented. In power systems, the order of bus numbers affects the power system's graph adjacency matrix and accordingly affects the optimal power flow (OPF) problem's constraint coefficient matrix. Changing this constraint coefficient matrix might change the OPF solution time. In this paper, we show that the order of bus numbers affects the solution time of AC and DC OPF problems when an interior point method-based solver is used. We propose a partition-based bus renumbering algorithm to be implemented before solving the OPF problem. This algorithm constructs a well-patterned constraint coefficient matrix and speeds up the OPF solution procedure. Numerical results on the IEEE 118-bus system and the 13659-bus European transmission system show effectiveness of the proposed algorithm in reducing the OPF's solution time. Implementation of the proposed method leads to about 65% of timesaving when Matpower is used to solve OPF.

[1]  Hua Wei,et al.  An interior point nonlinear programming for optimal power flow problems with a novel data structure , 1997 .

[2]  Ian A. Hiskens,et al.  Solving Multiperiod OPF Problems Using an AC-QP Algorithm Initialized With an SOCP Relaxation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[3]  Jacek Gondzio,et al.  Exploiting structure in parallel implementation of interior point methods for optimization , 2009, Comput. Manag. Sci..

[4]  P. Hespanha,et al.  An Efficient MATLAB Algorithm for Graph Partitioning , 2006 .

[5]  Anil K. Jain Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means , 2008, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[6]  Jacek Gondzio,et al.  Solving non-linear portfolio optimization problems with the primal-dual interior point method , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[7]  R D Zimmerman,et al.  MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, Planning, and Analysis Tools for Power Systems Research and Education , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[8]  M. B. Cain,et al.  History of Optimal Power Flow and Formulations , 2012 .

[9]  D. Ernst,et al.  Interior-point based algorithms for the solution of optimal power flow problems , 2007 .

[10]  Gabriela Hug,et al.  Intelligent Partitioning in Distributed Optimization of Electric Power Systems , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid.

[11]  W. Tinney,et al.  Optimal Power Flow By Newton Approach , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[12]  S. Low,et al.  Zero Duality Gap in Optimal Power Flow Problem , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[13]  Jacek Gondzio,et al.  Implementation of Interior Point Methods for Large Scale Linear Programming , 1996 .

[15]  Jean Maeght,et al.  AC Power Flow Data in MATPOWER and QCQP Format: iTesla, RTE Snapshots, and PEGASE , 2016, 1603.01533.