The effect of changes in laboratory practices on the rate of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

CONTEXT False-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis have been found in nearly all DNA fingerprinting studies, but the effectiveness of interventions to reduce cross-contamination has not been evaluated. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether changes in laboratory policies and procedures reduced the rate of false-positive cultures. DESIGN Retrospective study of isolates with matching DNA fingerprints. SETTING A mycobacteriology laboratory serving an urban tuberculosis control program and public hospital system. PATIENTS All M tuberculosis isolates processed from July 1994 to December 1999. METHODS Isolates were fingerprinted using IS6110; pTBN12 was used to fingerprint isolates having fewer than 6 copies of IS6110. We further evaluated all patients having only one positive culture whose DNA fingerprint matched that of another isolate processed in the laboratory within 42 days. INTERVENTIONS We changed laboratory policy to reduce the number of smear-positive specimens processed and changed laboratory procedures to minimize the risk of cross-contamination during batch processing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE The rate of false-positive cultures. RESULTS Of 13 940 specimens processed during the study period, 630 (4.5%) from 184 patients and 48 laboratory proficiency specimens grew M tuberculosis. There were no cases (0/184) of probable or definite cross-contamination, compared with the 4% rate (8/199) identified in our previous study (P =.008). We also fingerprinted a convenience sample of isolates from other laboratories in Denver; 13.6% (3/22) of these were false-positive, a rate similar to the 11.9% rate (5/42) identified for other laboratories in our previous study (P =.84). CONCLUSIONS Laboratory cross-contamination decreased significantly after relatively simple, inexpensive changes in laboratory policies and practices. Cross-contamination continued to occur in other laboratories in Denver.

[1]  R. Reves,et al.  Review of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis and recommendations for avoiding unnecessary treatment. , 2000, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[2]  M. Salfinger,et al.  False-Positive Results for Mycobacterium celatum with the AccuProbe Mycobacterium tuberculosisComplex Assay , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[3]  J. Musser,et al.  Extensive Cross-Contamination of Specimens withMycobacterium tuberculosis in a Reference Laboratory , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[4]  D. van Soolingen,et al.  Investigation of cross contamination in a Mycobacterium tuberculosis laboratory using IS6110 DNA fingerprinting. , 1998, The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease : the official journal of the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease.

[5]  S. Segal-Maurer,et al.  Mycobacterium tuberculosis Specimen Contamination Revisited: The Role of Laboratory Environmental Control in a Pseudo-outbreak , 1998, Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology.

[6]  C. Woodley,et al.  Transmission of a highly drug-resistant strain (strain W1) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Community outbreak and nosocomial transmission via a contaminated bronchoscope. , 1997, JAMA.

[7]  Michael L Wilson,et al.  The diagnostic yield of acid-fast-bacillus smear-positive sputum specimens , 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[8]  R. Reves,et al.  The incidence of false-positive cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. , 1997, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[9]  J. Bates,et al.  Usefulness of the secondary probe pTBN12 in DNA fingerprinting of Mycobacterium tuberculosis , 1996, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[10]  G. Schoolnik,et al.  Molecular strain typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to confirm cross-contamination in the mycobacteriology laboratory and modification of procedures to minimize occurrence of false-positive cultures , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[11]  J. T. Crawford,et al.  Strain identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by DNA fingerprinting: recommendations for a standardized methodology , 1993, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[12]  D. Mitchison,et al.  Quality control in tuberculosis bacteriology. 1. Laboratory studies on isolated positive cultures and the efficiency of direct smear examination. , 1980, Tubercle.

[13]  H. Yeager,et al.  Quantitative studies of mycobacterial populations in sputum and saliva. , 1967, The American review of respiratory disease.