The influence of hedonic quality on the attractiveness of user interfaces of business management software

Recent work concerning user satisfaction shows that hedonic aspects of a user interface influence the perceived usability and attractiveness of the product. We investigate if these results can also be applied to business management software. In addition, we try to clarify the impact of hedonic aspects on user preference for different user interfaces. In an empirical study subjects judged three different user interfaces for the same business task with respect to their attractiveness by filling out the AttrakDiff2 questionnaire (Hassenzahl, M., Burmester, M., Koller, F., 2003. AttrakDiff: Ein Fragebogen zur Messung wahrgenommener hedonischer und pragmatischer Qualitat. [AttrakDiff: A questionnaire for the measurement of perceived hedonic and pragmatic quality]. In: J. Ziegler and G. Szwillus (Eds.), Mensch and Computer 2003: Interaktion in Bewegung, 187-196. Stuttgart, Leipzig: B.G. Teubner). The subjects ranked the interfaces also by personal preference. The results show that pragmatic and hedonic qualities have an impact on attractiveness. In addition, the more attractive an interface is the higher is the preference of subjects for this interface.

[1]  Yili Liu,et al.  Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology , 2003, Ergonomics.

[2]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics , 1994, CHI '94.

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Beyond Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2001 .

[4]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[5]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Aesthetics and apparent usability: empirically assessing cultural and methodological issues , 1997, CHI.

[6]  Michael Burmester,et al.  Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software's appeal , 2000, CHI.

[7]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The respective roles of perceived usefulness and perceived fun in the acceptance of microcomputer technology , 1994, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[8]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Effect of Perceived Hedonic Quality on Product Appealingness , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  Gerd Szwillus,et al.  Mensch & Computer 2004: Allgegenwärtige Interaktion , 2004 .

[10]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Improving a human-computer dialogue , 1990, CACM.

[11]  Masaaki Kurosu,et al.  Apparent usability vs. inherent usability: experimental analysis on the determinants of the apparent usability , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[12]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[13]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Gitte Lindgaard,et al.  What is this evasive beast we call user satisfaction? , 2003, Interact. Comput..

[15]  D. Norman.  Emotional design : why we love (or hate) everyday things , 2004 .

[16]  Martin G Helander,et al.  Hedonomics—affective human factors design , 2003, Ergonomics.