Large-scale measurement experiments of P2P-TV systems insights on fairness and locality

P2P-TV is an emerging alternative to classical television broadcast systems. Leveraging possibilities o ered by the Internet, several companies o er P2P-TV services to their customers. The overwhelming majority of these systems however is of closed nature, o ering little insight on their tra c properties. For a better understanding of the P2P-TV landscape, we performed measurement experiments in France, Japan, Spain, and Romania, using di erent commercial applications. By using multiple measurement points in di erent locations of the world, our results can paint a global picture of the measured networks, inferring their main properties. More precisely, we focus on the level of collaboration between peers, their location and the e ect of the tra c on the networks. Our results show that there is no fairness between peers and that is an important issue for the scalability of P2P-TV systems. Moreover, hundreds of Autonomous Systems are involved in the P2P-TV tra c and it points out the lack of locality-aware mechanisms for these systems. The geographic location of peers testifies the wide spread of these applications in Asia and highlights their worldwide usage.

[1]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  Inferring Network-Wide Quality in P2P Live Streaming Systems , 2007, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[2]  Massimo Gallo,et al.  P2P-TV Systems under Adverse Network Conditions: A Measurement Study , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[3]  Fernando Gont,et al.  Security implications of Network Address Translators (NATs) , 2009 .

[4]  Gonzalo Camarillo,et al.  Problem Statement of P2P Streaming Protocol (PPSP) , 2010 .

[5]  Chuan Wu,et al.  UUSee: Large-Scale Operational On-Demand Streaming with Random Network Coding , 2010, 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[6]  Keith W. Ross,et al.  A Measurement Study of a Large-Scale P2P IPTV System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[7]  Antonio Pescapè,et al.  Traffic analysis of peer-to-peer IPTV communities , 2009, Comput. Networks.

[8]  A. Feldmann,et al.  Can ISPs and P2P systems co-operate for improved performance? , 2007 .

[9]  A. Singh Challenges " # , 2006 .

[10]  Cheng Huang,et al.  Challenges, design and analysis of a large-scale p2p-vod system , 2008, SIGCOMM '08.

[11]  Prithula Dhungel,et al.  The pollution attack in P2P live video streaming: measurement results and defenses , 2007, P2P-TV '07.

[12]  Christian Scheideler,et al.  Can ISPS and P2P users cooperate for improved performance? , 2007, CCRV.

[13]  Kavé Salamatian,et al.  Measuring P2P-TV systems on both sides of the world , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo.

[14]  Indranil Gupta,et al.  Understanding overlay characteristics of a large-scale peer-to-peer IPTV system , 2010, TOMCCAP.

[15]  Chuan Wu,et al.  Multi-Channel Live P2P Streaming: Refocusing on Servers , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[16]  Olivier Fourmaux,et al.  Measuring P2P IPTV Systems , 2007 .

[17]  Leslie Daigle,et al.  WHOIS Protocol Specification , 2004, RFC.

[18]  Diego Perino,et al.  PULSE: An Adaptive, Incentive-Based, Unstructured P2P Live Streaming System , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Multimedia.

[19]  Jordi Domingo-Pascual,et al.  CoreCast: How core/edge separation can help improving inter-domain live streaming , 2010, Comput. Networks.

[20]  Fabián E. Bustamante,et al.  Taming the torrent: a practical approach to reducing cross-isp traffic in peer-to-peer systems , 2008, SIGCOMM '08.

[21]  Chuan Wu,et al.  Distilling Superior Peers in Large-Scale P2P Streaming Systems , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[22]  Wenjie Wang,et al.  Impacts of Peer Characteristics on P2PTV Networks Scalability , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.