Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities is driven by distractor suppression not by target activation

[1]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Proactively location-based suppression elicited by statistical learning , 2020, PloS one.

[2]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture , 2019, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[3]  H. Slagter,et al.  Inhibition in selective attention , 2019, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Brett Bahle,et al.  Feature-Based Statistical Regularities of Distractors Modulate Attentional Capture , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Goal-driven, stimulus-driven, and history-driven selection. , 2019, Current opinion in psychology.

[7]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy , 2018, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression , 2018, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[9]  Michel F. Failing,et al.  People look at the object they fear: oculomotor capture by stimuli that signal threat , 2017, Cognition & emotion.

[10]  Michel F. Failing,et al.  Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[11]  Leonardo Chelazzi,et al.  Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering , 2017, Cortex.

[12]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  Tom Beesley,et al.  When goals conflict with values: counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[14]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Attentional capture by signals of threat , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[15]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Context homogeneity facilitates both distractor inhibition and target enhancement. , 2013, Journal of vision.

[16]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Theeuwes.  Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[19]  L. Chelazzi,et al.  Learning to Attend and to Ignore Is a Matter of Gains and Losses , 2009, Psychological science.

[20]  Richard D. Morey,et al.  Confidence Intervals from Normalized Data: A correction to Cousineau (2005) , 2008 .

[21]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[22]  M. Behrmann,et al.  Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  Robert Desimone,et al.  Parallel and Serial Neural Mechanisms for Visual Search in Macaque Area V4 , 2005, Science.

[24]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing of visual attention , 2022 .

[25]  M. Chun,et al.  Contextual Cueing: Implicit Learning and Memory of Visual Context Guides Spatial Attention , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[27]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  J. Theeuwes.  Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Statistical Regularities Modulate Attentional Capture , 2018, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Exogenous visual orienting by reward. , 2014, Journal of vision.

[33]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 4.0: Current Progress With a Model of Visual Search , 2007, Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems.

[34]  Marvin M. Chun,et al.  Contextual cueing: Reciprocal influences between attention and implicit learning. , 2003 .