A study of the standard brain in Japanese children: Morphological comparison with the MNI template

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies involve normalization so that the brains of different subjects can be described using the same coordinate system. However, standard brain templates, including the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template that is most frequently used at present, were created based on the brains of Western adults. Because morphological characteristics of the brain differ by race and ethnicity and between adults and children, errors are likely to occur when data from the brains of non-Western individuals are processed using these templates. Therefore, this study was conducted to collect basic data for the creation of a Japanese pediatric standard brain. Participants in this study were 45 healthy children (contributing 65 brain images) between the ages of 6 and 9 years, who had nothing notable in their perinatal and other histories and neurological findings, had normal physical findings and cognitive function, exhibited no behavioral abnormalities, and provided analyzable MR images. 3D-T1-weighted images were obtained using a 1.5-T MRI device, and images from each child were adjusted to the reference image by affine transformation using SPM8. The lengths were measured and compared with those of the MNI template. The Western adult standard brain and the Japanese pediatric standard brain obtained in this study differed greatly in size, particularly along the anteroposterior diameter and in height, suggesting that the correction rates are high, and that errors are likely to occur in the normalization of pediatric brain images. We propose that the use of the Japanese pediatric standard brain created in this study will improve the accuracy of identification of brain regions in functional brain imaging studies involving children.

[1]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  The construction of a Chinese MRI brain atlas: A morphometric comparison study between Chinese and Caucasian cohorts , 2010, NeuroImage.

[2]  H. Engeland,et al.  Variability in spatial normalization of pediatric and adult brain images , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  A. Seki,et al.  Incidental Findings of Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study in a Pediatric Cohort in Japan and Recommendation for a Model Management Protocol , 2010, Journal of epidemiology.

[4]  Suzanne E. Welcome,et al.  Mapping cortical change across the human life span , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[5]  Kazunori Sato,et al.  Neuroanatomical database of normal Japanese brains , 2003, Neural Networks.

[6]  J. S. Lee,et al.  Development of Korean Standard Brain Templates , 2005, Journal of Korean medical science.

[7]  J. Talairach,et al.  Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain: 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging , 1988 .

[8]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Development of NTU standard Chinese brain template: Morphologic and functional comparison with MNI template using magnetic resonance imaging , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  O. Muzik,et al.  Statistical Parametric Mapping: Assessment of Application in Children , 2000, NeuroImage.

[10]  Thomas F. Nugent,et al.  Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  A W Toga,et al.  Maps of the Brain , 2001, The Anatomical record.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .

[13]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  The myth of the normal, average human brain—The ICBM experience: (1) Subject screening and eligibility , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  et al.,et al.  The Effect of Template Choice on Morphometric Analysis of Pediatric Brain Data ☆ , 2022 .

[15]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Correlation between gray matter density‐adjusted brain perfusion and age using brain MR images of 202 healthy children , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The NIH MRI study of normal brain development , 2006, NeuroImage.

[17]  T. Schormann,et al.  Hemispheric Shape of European and Japanese Brains: 3-D MRI Analysis of Intersubject Variability, Ethnical, and Gender Differences , 2001, NeuroImage.

[18]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[19]  Scott Holland,et al.  Template-O-Matic: A toolbox for creating customized pediatric templates , 2008, NeuroImage.

[20]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies , 2011, NeuroImage.

[21]  Marko Wilke,et al.  Assessment of spatial normalization of whole‐brain magnetic resonance images in children , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[22]  J Mazziotta,et al.  A probabilistic atlas and reference system for the human brain: International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM). , 2001, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[23]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  A Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development The International Consortium for Brain Mapping (ICBM) , 1995, NeuroImage.

[24]  Hiroshi Fukuda,et al.  Voxel-based morphometry of human brain with age and cerebrovascular risk factors , 2004, Neurobiology of Aging.