Blind Phase Search with Angular Quantization Noise Mitigation for Efficient Carrier Phase Recovery

The inherent discrete phase search nature of the conventional blind phase search (C-BPS) algorithm is found to introduce angular quantization noise in its phase noise estimator. The angular quantization noise found in the C-BPS is shown to limit its achievable performance and its potential low complexity implementation. A novel filtered BPS algorithm (F-BPS) is proposed and demonstrated to mitigate this quantization noise by performing a low pass filter operation on the C-BPS phase noise estimator. The improved performance of the proposed F-BPS algorithm makes it possible to significantly reduce the number of necessary test phases to achieve the C-BPS performance, thereby allowing for a drastic reduction of its practical implementation complexity. The proposed F-BPS scheme performance is evaluated on a 28-Gbaud 16QAM and 64QAM both in simulations and experimentally. Results confirm a substantial improvement of the performance along with a significant reduction of its potential implementation complexity compared to that of the C-BPS.

[1]  J. C. Cartledge,et al.  Linewidth-Tolerant and Low-Complexity Two-Stage Carrier Phase Estimation Based on Modified QPSK Partitioning for Dual-Polarization 16-QAM Systems , 2013, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[2]  J. C. Rasmussen,et al.  Laser-Linewidth-Tolerant Feed-Forward Carrier Phase Estimator With Reduced Complexity for QAM , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Patricia Bower,et al.  High speed converters and DSP for 100G and beyond , 2011 .

[4]  Keping Long,et al.  Low-Complexity Carrier Phase Recovery for Square M-QAM Based on S-BPS Algorithm , 2014, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  Arthur James Lowery,et al.  Experimental demonstration of a flexible and stable semiconductor laser linewidth emulator. , 2010, Optics express.

[6]  Gabriella Bosco,et al.  Multistage Carrier Phase Estimation Algorithms for Phase Noise Mitigation in 64-Quadrature Amplitude Modulation Optical Systems , 2014, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[7]  K. Kikuchi Characterization of semiconductor-laser phase noise and estimation of bit-error rate performance with low-speed offline digital coherent receivers. , 2012, Optics express.

[8]  Yan Li,et al.  Multi-stage feed-forward optical carrier phase estimation based on QPSK partitioning for 64-QAM signals , 2013 .

[9]  Wenbo Zhang,et al.  A Multistage CPE Scheme Based on Crossed Constellation Transformation for M-QAM , 2015, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[10]  Oskars Ozolins,et al.  Carrier Phase Recovery Algorithms for Coherent Optical Circular mQAM Systems , 2016, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[11]  Han Sun,et al.  Novel 16QAM carrier recovery based on blind phase search , 2014, 2014 The European Conference on Optical Communication (ECOC).

[12]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  An Improved Feed-Forward Carrier Recovery Algorithm for Coherent Receivers With $M$ -QAM Modulation Format , 2010, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[13]  Andrew J. Viterbi,et al.  Nonlinear estimation of PSK-modulated carrier phase with application to burst digital transmission , 1983, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[14]  Gabriella Bosco,et al.  Carrier Phase Estimation Through the Rotation Algorithm for 64-QAM Optical Systems , 2015, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  R. Noe,et al.  Hardware-Efficient Coherent Digital Receiver Concept With Feedforward Carrier Recovery for $M$ -QAM Constellations , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  Oskars Ozolins,et al.  High performance and low complexity carrier phase recovery schemes for 64-QAM coherent optical systems , 2017, 2017 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC).

[17]  Lei Deng,et al.  Low-complexity feed-forward carrier phase estimation for M-ary QAM based on phase search acceleration by quadratic approximation. , 2015, Optics express.