Intimacy and homicide: compensating for missing data in the shr*

The Supplementary Homicide Report (SHR) of the FBI's Uniform Crime Reporting Program remains the most accessible and widely used database on lethal violence in the United States. However, researchers using this database must address the problem of missing data, which typically is the result of the failure to file, inconsistent filing of reports to the FBI by local police agencies, or incomplete records about the characteristics of specific incidents of homicide (particularly, missing information about perpetrators), even when reports are filed. Williams and Flewelling (1987) proposed methods of compensating for missing information, and this paper revisits their assessment by again determining the extent of the problem and the consequences of adjusting for it. Alternative methods are proposed and analyzed, with a focus on relationship-specific rates (i.e., rates of family, intimate nonfamily, acquaintance, and stranger homicide). The implications of the results for further use of the SHR are discussed.

[1]  Marc Riedel,et al.  Counting Stranger Homicides , 1998 .

[2]  Deann K. Gauthier,et al.  GENDER EQUALITY AND THE SEX RATIO OF INTIMATE KILLING , 1997 .

[3]  K. Land,et al.  An Empirical Evaluation of the Predictive Mean Matching Method for Imputing Missing Values , 1997 .

[4]  Karen F. Parker,et al.  Adding another Piece to the Inequality-Homicide Puzzle , 1997 .

[5]  Alfred Blumstein,et al.  Linking Gun Availability to Youth Gun Violence , 1996 .

[6]  M. Smith,et al.  Gender Inequality and Rates of Female Homicide Victimization Across U.S. Cities , 1995 .

[7]  Scott H. Decker,et al.  Exploring victim-offender relationships in homicide: The role of individual and event characteristics , 1993 .

[8]  Lauren J. Krivo,et al.  Racial Segregation and Black Urban Homicide , 1993 .

[9]  K. Williams,et al.  GENDER, INTIMACY, AND LETHAL VIOLENCE: , 1993 .

[10]  S. Messner,et al.  Interracial homicide: A macrostructural-opportunity perspective , 1992 .

[11]  Steven F. Messner,et al.  RACIAL INEQUALITY AND RACIALLY DISAGGREGATED HOMICIDE RATES: AN ASSESSMENT OF ALTERNATIVE THEORETICAL EXPLANATIONS* , 1992 .

[12]  M. Smith,et al.  A Sex-Specific Analysis of Correlates of Homicide Victimization in United States Cities , 1992, Violence and Victims.

[13]  R. Parker,et al.  Family, Intimacy, and Homicide: A Macro-Social Approach , 1990, Violence and Victims.

[14]  Lawrence E. Cohen,et al.  Structural Covariates of Homicide Rates: Are There Any Invariances Across Time and Social Space? , 1990, American Journal of Sociology.

[15]  K. Williams,et al.  Exploring the Effect of Resource Availability and the Likelihood of Female-Perpetrated Homicides , 1989 .

[16]  Kirk R. Williams,et al.  The Social Production of Criminal Homicide: A Comparative Study of Disaggregated Rates in American Cities , 1988 .

[17]  Robert J. Sampson,et al.  Urban Black Violence: The Effect of Male Joblessness and Family Disruption , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  Kirk R. Williams,et al.  FAMILY, ACQUAINTANCE, AND STRANGER HOMICIDE: ALTERNATIVE PROCEDURES FOR RATE CALCULATIONS* , 1987 .

[19]  R. Parker,et al.  AN ERRORS‐IN‐VARIABLE MODEL OF THE EFFECT OF POVERTY ON URBAN HOMICIDE RATES , 1985 .

[20]  R. Parker,et al.  Deterrence, Poverty, and Type of Homicide , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.