Depth-acclimation of photosynthesis, morphology and demography of Posidonia oceanica and Cymodocea nodosa in the Spanish Mediterranean Sea

Depth-related changes in population structure, biomass partitioning and photosynthesis were studied in populations of Cymodocea nodosa and Posidonia oceanica on the NE Spanish coast. The population structure of both species changed much more with depth than leaf morphology and physiology. Leaf biomass declined 5- to 7-fold along the depth gradient reducing self-shading within the canopy, whereas the leaf area per unit leaf biomass and the photosynthesis-light response varied less than 1.5-fold among depths. Moreover, C. nodosa developed a greater proportion of leaves relative to rhizomes and roots at greater depths, thereby promoting the balance between photosyn- thesis and respiration in the shoots. C. nodosa, being a potentially fast-growing species compared to P. oceanica, had higher maximum photosynthetic and respiration rates as well as light compensation points for photosynthesis. Photosynthetic efficiency at low light, however, was almost the same for the 2 species as suggested by the relatively small differences in mass-specific light absorption. Only C. nodosa acclimated physiologically to depth as light-use efficiency increased, and light compensation point declined significantly from shallow to deep water. P. oceanica, however, possessed low respira- tion rates and slightly lower light compensation points values than C. nodosa throughout the depth range. Shoot mortality and recruitment rates were unaffected by rooting depth. C. nodosa stand experienced fast shoot turnover compared to P. oceanica, and shoot longevity of the former species decreased significantly with depth, suggesting higher risk of patch mortality at the depth limit. In contrast, P. oceanica shoot longevity was highest at great depths. Overall, these species differences in leaf metabolism and shoot dynamics suggest that C. nodosa responds faster to changing light con- ditions, whereas P. oceanica is able to survive longer at low irradiance due to low growth and respi- ratory maintenance rates.

[1]  C. Hartog,et al.  The Sea- Grasses Of The World , 1970 .

[2]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Seasonal acclimatization of eelgrass Zostera marina growth to light , 1993 .

[3]  D. Tomasko,et al.  In situ photosynthesis in the seagrass Halodule wrightii in a hypersaline subtropical lagoon , 1994 .

[4]  P. Tett,et al.  Problems in Modelling the Photosynthesis-Light Relationship for Phytoplankton , 1981 .

[5]  V. Zupo,et al.  Primary Production and Growth Dynamics in Posidonia oceanica , 1992 .

[6]  K. Sand‐Jensen Biomass, net production and growth dynamics in an eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) population in Vellerup Vig, Denmark , 1975 .

[7]  James W. Fourqurean,et al.  Photosynthesis, respiration and whole plant carbon budget of the seagrass Thalassia testudinum , 1991 .

[8]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  Resource allocation and sucrose mobilization in light-limited eelgrass Zostera marina , 1999 .

[9]  T. Backman,et al.  Irradiance reduction: Effects on standing crops of the eelgrass Zostera marina in a coastal lagoon , 1976 .

[10]  W. Dennison,et al.  Role of daily light period in the depth distribution of Zostera marina (eelgrass) , 1985 .

[11]  K. Sand‐Jensen,et al.  Minimum light requirements of submerged freshwater macrophytes in laboratory growth experiments. , 1991 .

[12]  W. Dennison Effects of light on seagrass photosynthesis, growth and depth distribution , 1987 .

[13]  Patricia A. Chambers,et al.  Depth distribution and biomass of submersed aquatic macrophyte communities in relation to Secchi depth , 1985 .

[14]  J. Barko,et al.  Growth and morphology of submersed freshwater macrophytes in relation to light and temperature , 1982 .

[15]  D. Bulthuis,et al.  Effects of in situ light reduction on density and growth of the seagrass Heterozostera tasmanica (Martens ex Aschers.) den Hartog in Western Port, Victoria, Australia , 1983 .

[16]  G. Kraemer,et al.  Impact of daily photosynthetic period on protein synthesis and carbohydrate stores in Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) roots: implications for survival in light-limited environments , 1995 .

[17]  P. Chambers,et al.  The influence of sediment composition and irradiance on the growth and morphology of Myriophyllum spicatum L. , 1985 .

[18]  Effects of shading on growth, biomass and population maintenance of the intertidal seagrass Zostera noltii Hornem. in the Dutch Wadden Sea , 1995 .

[19]  C. Duarte Seagrass depth limits , 1991 .

[20]  A. Middelboe,et al.  Eelgrass, Zostera marina, growth along depth gradients: upper boundaries of the variation as a powerful predictive tool , 2000 .

[21]  B. Osborne,et al.  Light and Photosynthesis in Aquatic Ecosystems. , 1985 .

[22]  Hendrik Poorter,et al.  Inherent Variation in Growth Rate Between Higher Plants: A Search for Physiological Causes and Ecological Consequences , 1992 .

[23]  K. Dunton,et al.  Effect of in situ light reduction on the maintenance, growth and partitioning of carbon resources in Thalassia testudinum banks ex König , 1997 .

[24]  L. Duysens,et al.  The flattening of the absorption spectrum of suspensions, as compared to that of solutions. , 1956, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[25]  W. Dennison,et al.  Photoadaptation and growth of Zostera marina L. (eelgrass) transplants along a depth gradient , 1986 .

[26]  Manfred Ehrhardt,et al.  Methods of seawater analysis , 1999 .

[27]  N. Marbà,et al.  Growth patterns of Western Mediterranean seagrasses:species-specific responses to seasonal forcing , 1996 .

[28]  Fortes,et al.  Reconstruction of seagrass dynamics: age determinations and associated tools for the seagrass ecologist , 1994 .

[29]  R. J. West Depth-related structural and morphological variations in an australian Posidonia seagrass bed , 1990 .

[30]  D. Spence,et al.  PHOTOSYNTHESIS AND ZONATION OF FRESHWATER MACROPHYTES , 1970 .

[31]  W. Dennison,et al.  Physiological and morphological responses of the seagrass Zostera capricorni Aschers, to light intensity , 1994 .

[32]  W. T. Haller,et al.  Adaptation to low light levels by Hydrilla , 1977 .

[33]  W. J. Goldsborough,et al.  Light responses of a submersed macrophyte: implications for survival in turbid tidal waters. , 1988 .

[34]  C. Sturmbauer,et al.  Light gradients and meadow structure in Posidonia oceanica: ecomorphological and functional correlates , 1998 .

[35]  R. M. Campbell,et al.  Specific Leaf Areas and Zonation of Freshwater Macrophytes , 1973 .

[36]  O. Björkman Responses to Different Quantum Flux Densities , 1981 .

[37]  J. Romero,et al.  Annual metabolic carbon balance of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: the importance of carbohydrate reserves , 2001 .

[38]  P. Morin,et al.  Precise shipboard determination of dissolved oxygen (Winkler procedure) for productivity studies with a commercial system1 , 1988 .

[39]  H. Pirc Seasonal aspects of photosynthesis in Posidonia oceanica: Influence of depth, temperature and light intensity , 1986 .

[40]  T. Alcoverro,et al.  The photosynthetic capacity of the seagrass Posidonia oceanica: influence of nitrogen and light. , 2001, Journal of experimental marine biology and ecology.

[41]  C. Duarte,et al.  Light absorption by marine macrophytes , 1994, Oecologia.