Measures of clinical efficacy. Cost-effectiveness calculations in the diagnosis and treatment of hypertensive renovascular disease.

The sensitivity and specificity of the hypertensive intravenous pyelogram and the iodohippuran renogram have been determined for the diagnosis of renovascular disease, and cost-effectiveness calculations have been made for the diagnosis and surgical treatment of patients with renovascular hypertension. When the intravenous pyelogram alone is used to screen representative hypertensive population, 78 per cent of patients with renovascular disease are located, but at the same time an equal number of patients without renovascular diasease have abnormal pyelograms. The renogram, on the other hand, is associated with varying true-positive and false-positive ratios. These data can be plotted in the form of a receiver-operating-characteristic curve. The cost of finding a patient with renovascular disease is about $2,000, and that of a surgical cure is about $20,000. The number of deaths for 100 surgical cures is approximately 15. The dollar cost of screening and treating the total American renovascular hypertensive population is of the order of 10 to 13 billion dollars.

[1]  H. Abrams,et al.  Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. 3. Appraisal of arteriography. , 1972, JAMA.

[2]  B. A. Burrows,et al.  RADIOISOTOPIC RENAL FUNCTION STUDIES AND SURGICAL FINDINGS IN 102 HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS. , 1964, American journal of surgery.

[3]  P. Varady,et al.  Cooperative study of renovascular hypertension. Demographic analysis of the study. , 1972, JAMA.

[4]  H. Abrams,et al.  Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. 2. The role of urography in unilateral renovascular disease. , 1972, JAMA.

[5]  Gellman Dd The price of progress: technology and the cost of medical care. , 1971 .

[6]  B. A. Burrows,et al.  Prognostic value of radioisotopic renal function studies for selecting patients with renal arterial stenosis for surgery. , 1970, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  C E Metz,et al.  Evaluation of receiver operating characteristic curve data in terms of information theory, with applications in radiography. , 1973, Radiology.

[8]  N. Lund,et al.  Renal artery stenosis and hypertension. II. Mortality in operated patients compared with the mortality in individually matched medically treated patients with cryptogenetic hypertension. , 1970, Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology.

[9]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[10]  H. Abrams,et al.  Radiologic aspects of renovascular hypertension. 1. Aims and methods of the radiology study group. , 1972, JAMA.

[11]  J. Stokes,et al.  Hypertension Control — The Challenge of Patient Education , 1973 .

[12]  J. Laragh Evaluation and care of the hypertensive patient. , 1972, The American journal of medicine.

[13]  H. Dustan,et al.  Correlation of angiography and natural history in evaluation of patients with renovascular hypertension. , 1970, The Journal of urology.

[14]  E. Keeler,et al.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making. , 1975, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  M. Collen,et al.  Dollar cost per positive test for automated multiphasic screening. , 1970, The New England journal of medicine.