A Method Framework for Design Science Research

In order to produce reliable results, design science studies need to make use of research strategies and methods as well as base their work on a scientific body of knowledge. This chapter proposes a method framework for design science research that supports researchers in producing relevant as well as rigorous research. Five key activities are identified: problem explication, requirements definition, design and development, demonstration, and evaluation. Two tools for visualising the design science process are introduced: an IDEF0 process diagram and a canvas format. Finally, the chapter discusses the relationships between the proposed framework and the scientific method.

[1]  Vijay K. Vaishnavi,et al.  Theory Development in Design Science Research: Anatomy of a Research Project , 2008 .

[2]  Roman Beck,et al.  Theory-generating design science research , 2013, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[3]  Samir Chatterjee,et al.  A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research , 2008 .

[4]  Robert Winter,et al.  Global Perspectives on Design Science Research, 5th International Conference, DESRIST 2010, St. Gallen, Switzerland, June 4-5, 2010. Proceedings , 2010, DESRIST.

[5]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  From Action Research to Practice Research , 2012, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Hemant Jain,et al.  Service-Oriented Perspectives in Design Science Research , 2011, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[7]  Martin Törngren,et al.  Tool Integration Beyond Wasserman , 2011, CAiSE 2011.

[8]  Göran Goldkuhl,et al.  A Multi-Grounded Design Research Process , 2010, DESRIST.

[9]  David Sundaram,et al.  Multi-Methodological Approaches in Design Science: A Review, Proposal and Application , 2013, PACIS.

[10]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[11]  Robert Wayne Gregory,et al.  Design Science Research and the Grounded Theory Method: Characteristics, Differences, and Complementary Uses , 2010, ECIS.

[12]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  Breaking out of the Design Science Box: High-Value Impact Through Multidisciplinary Design Science Programs of Research , 2013, AMCIS.

[14]  Henderik Alex Proper,et al.  Developing the GEA Method - Design Science and Case-Study Research in Action , 2013, CAiSE Workshops.

[15]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  Forms of Reasoning in the Design Science Research Process , 2011, DESRIST.

[16]  Steven Gimbel.  Exploring the scientific method : cases and questions , 2011 .

[17]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  Theory-Guided Modeling and Empiricism in Information Systems Research , 2011 .

[18]  Guy G. Gable,et al.  The Design Science Research Roadmap: In Progress Evaluation , 2013, PACIS.

[19]  Ahmad Alturki,et al.  A Design Science Research Roadmap , 2011, PACIS.

[20]  N.F.M. Roozenburg,et al.  A methodological comparison of the structures of scientific research and engineering design: their similarities and differences , 1991 .