Anatomical connection strength predicts dopaminergic drug effects on fronto-striatal function

RationaleThe neurotransmitter dopamine plays a key role in cognitive functions that are associated with fronto-striatal circuitry and has been implicated in many neuropsychiatric disorders. However, there is a large variability in the direction and extent of dopaminergic drug effects across individuals.ObjectivesWe investigated whether individual differences in dopaminergic drug effects on human fronto-striatal functioning are associated with individual differences in white matter tracts.MethodsThe effects of the dopamine receptor agonist bromocriptine were assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging in 22 healthy volunteers in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, within-subject design. Human psychopharmacology and functional neuroimaging were combined with functional connectivity analyses and structural connectivity analyses to establish a link between dopaminergic drug effects on fronto-striatal function and fronto-striatal anatomy.ResultsWe demonstrate that bromocriptine alters functional signals associated with attention switching in the basal ganglia. Crucially, individual differences in the drug’s effect on these signals could be predicted from individual differences in fronto-striato-thalamic white matter tracts, as indexed by diffusion tensor imaging. Anatomical fronto-striatal connectivity also predicted drug effects on switch-related functional connectivity between the basal ganglia and the prefrontal cortex.ConclusionsThese data reinforce the link between dopamine, cognition and the basal ganglia and have implications for the individual tailoring of dopaminergic drug therapy based on anatomical fronto-striatal connection strength.

[1]  D. Salat,et al.  Choice reaction time performance correlates with diffusion anisotropy in white matter pathways supporting visuospatial attention. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  C. Beaulieu,et al.  The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system – a technical review , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[3]  John Duncan,et al.  Selective Tuning of the Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Response during Simple Target Detection Dissociates Human Frontoparietal Subregions , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  J. Bolam,et al.  The Relationship between Dopaminergic Axons and Glutamatergic Synapses in the Striatum: Structural Considerations , 2009 .

[5]  T. Robbins,et al.  Methylphenidate Has Differential Effects on Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Signal Related to Cognitive Subprocesses of Reversal Learning , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  Thomas E. Hazy,et al.  Towards an executive without a homunculus: computational models of the prefrontal cortex/basal ganglia system , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Function and Structure of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Predict Individual Differences in Response Inhibition: A Model-Based Approach , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Inverted-U–Shaped Dopamine Actions on Human Working Memory and Cognitive Control , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[9]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Functional connectivity during working memory maintenance , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[10]  R. Cools,et al.  The Human Basal Ganglia Modulate Frontal-Posterior Connectivity during Attention Shifting , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Seamans,et al.  The principal features and mechanisms of dopamine modulation in the prefrontal cortex , 2004, Progress in Neurobiology.

[12]  B. Pitt Psychopharmacology , 1968, Mental Health.

[13]  Jean-Luc Anton,et al.  Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox , 2010 .

[14]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Individual capacity differences predict working memory performance and prefrontal activity following dopamine receptor stimulation , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Improving Lesion-Symptom Mapping , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  M. Farah,et al.  Effects of bromocriptine on human subjects depend on working memory capacity , 1997, Neuroreport.

[17]  C. Li,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Connectivity Delineates Distinct Roles of the Inferior Frontal Cortex and Presupplementary Motor Area in Stop Signal Inhibition , 2022 .

[18]  M. Reuter,et al.  Dopamine DRD2 polymorphism alters reversal learning and associated neural activity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  O. Monchi,et al.  Dopamine Depletion Impairs Frontostriatal Functional Connectivity during a Set-Shifting Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  Individual Differences in White-Matter Microstructure Reflect Variation in Functional Connectivity during Choice , 2007, Current Biology.

[21]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[22]  D. James Surmeier,et al.  Thalamic Gating of Corticostriatal Signaling by Cholinergic Interneurons , 2010, Neuron.

[23]  M. Frank,et al.  Striatal Dopamine Predicts Outcome-Specific Reversal Learning and Its Sensitivity to Dopaminergic Drug Administration , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  M. P. Zwiers,et al.  EPI DISTORTION CORRECTION BY CONSTRAINED NONLINEAR COREGISTRATION IMPROVES GROUP FMRI , 2009 .

[25]  E T Bullmore,et al.  Dopaminergic drug effects on physiological connectivity in a human cortico-striato-thalamic system. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Stefan Skare,et al.  A Model-Based Method for Retrospective Correction of Geometric Distortions in Diffusion-Weighted EPI , 2002, NeuroImage.

[27]  Marcel P. Zwiers,et al.  Patching cardiac and head motion artefacts in diffusion-weighted images , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A critique of functional localisers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[29]  Colin Studholme,et al.  Accurate alignment of functional EPI data to anatomical MRI using a physics-based distortion model , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[30]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[31]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  A functional MRI study of the effects of bromocriptine, a dopamine receptor agonist, on component processes of working memory , 2005, Psychopharmacology.

[32]  D. Pandya,et al.  Distinct Parietal and Temporal Pathways to the Homologues of Broca's Area in the Monkey , 2009, PLoS biology.

[33]  C. Montag,et al.  Frontostriatal Involvement in Task Switching Depends on Genetic Differences in D2 Receptor Density , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain? , 2007, NeuroImage.

[35]  M. Mehta,et al.  Dopaminergic enhancement of cognitive function. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[36]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited , 2007, NeuroImage.

[37]  R. Cools,et al.  Establishing the dopamine dependency of human striatal signals during reward and punishment reversal learning. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[38]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Bond,et al.  The use of analogue scales in rating subjective feelings , 1974 .

[40]  Heidi Johansen-Berg,et al.  White matter integrity in the vicinity of Broca's area predicts grammar learning success , 2009, NeuroImage.

[41]  T. Moore,et al.  CONTROL OF VISUAL CORTICAL SIGNALS BY PREFRONTAL DOPAMINE , 2011, Nature.

[42]  M. Vink,et al.  On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition , 2010, PloS one.

[43]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Impulsive Personality Predicts Dopamine-Dependent Changes in Frontostriatal Activity during Component Processes of Working Memory , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[45]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  The Dopamine Agonist Bromocriptine Differentially Affects Fronto-Striatal Functional Connectivity During Working Memory , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[47]  G. E. Alexander,et al.  Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex. , 1986, Annual review of neuroscience.

[48]  A. Grace,et al.  Dopaminergic modulation of limbic and cortical drive of nucleus accumbens in goal-directed behavior , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[49]  B. Franke,et al.  Striatal Dopamine Mediates the Interface between Motivational and Cognitive Control in Humans: Evidence from Genetic Imaging , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[50]  Peter N. C. Mohr,et al.  Genetic variation in dopaminergic neuromodulation influences the ability to rapidly and flexibly adapt decisions , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.