Balancing Act: Enabling Public Engagement with Sustainability Issues through a Multi-touch Tabletop Collaborative Game

Despite a long history of using participatory methods to enable public engagement with issues of societal importance, interactive displays have only recently been explored for this purpose. In this paper, we evaluate a tabletop game called Futura, which was designed to engage the public with issues of sustainability. Our design is grounded in prior research on public displays, serious games, and computer supported collaborative learning. We suggest that a role-based, persistent simulation style game implemented on a multi-touch tabletop affords unique opportunities for a walk-up-and-play style of public engagement. We report on a survey-based field study with 90 participants at the 2010 Vancouver Winter Olympics (Canada). The study demonstrated that small groups of people can be immediately engaged, participate collaboratively, and can master basic awareness outcomes around sustainability issues. However, it is difficult to design feedback that disambiguates between individual and group actions, and shows the temporal trajectory of activity.

[1]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[2]  Richard N. Van Eck.  Digital Game-Based Learning: It's Not Just the Digital Natives Who Are Restless. , 2006 .

[3]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[4]  Daniel Vogel,et al.  Interactive public ambient displays: transitioning from implicit to explicit, public to personal, interaction with multiple users , 2004, UIST '04.

[5]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Worlds of information: designing for engagement at a public multi-touch display , 2010, CHI.

[6]  Lars Erik Holmquist,et al.  UbiComp 2002: Ubiquitous Computing , 2002 .

[7]  Daniel M. Russell,et al.  Social Aspects of Using Large Public Interactive Displays for Collaboration , 2002, UbiComp.

[8]  Alenda Y. Chang.  Playing the Environment: Games as Virtual Ecologies , 2009 .

[9]  Marisa E. Campbell.  CHI 2004 , 2004, INTR.

[10]  Pierre Dillenbourg,et al.  Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches , 1999 .

[11]  T. Duffy,et al.  Critical Thinking in a Distributed Environment : A pedagogical base for the design of conferencing systems , 1998 .

[12]  Elise van den Hoven,et al.  Exploring How Tangible Tools Enable Collaboration in a Multi-touch Tabletop Game , 2011, INTERACT.

[13]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[14]  Mike Wu,et al.  Multi-finger and whole hand gestural interaction techniques for multi-user tabletop displays , 2003, UIST '03.

[15]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Semi-public displays for small, co-located groups , 2003, CHI '03.

[16]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre , 2008, CHI.

[17]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes , 2003 .

[18]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  From entry to access: how shareability comes about , 2007, DPPI.

[19]  Daniel D. Suthers,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning. , 2003 .

[20]  Tracy Mitrano.  A Wider World: Youth, Privacy, and Social Networking Technologies. , 2006 .

[21]  Anne Marie Piper,et al.  Tabletop displays for small group study: affordances of paper and digital materials , 2009, CHI.

[22]  Pei Wang,et al.  What Do You Mean by "AI"? , 2008, AGI.

[23]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Finger talk: collaborative decision-making using talk and fingertip interaction around a tabletop display , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[24]  Daniel J. Wigdor,et al.  Direct-touch vs. mouse input for tabletop displays , 2007, CHI.

[25]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Territoriality in collaborative tabletop workspaces , 2004, CSCW.

[26]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[27]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  The Construction of Shared Knowledge in Collaborative Problem Solving , 1995 .

[28]  Curtis J. Bonk,et al.  Electronic Collaborators: Learner-Centered Technologies for Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse , 1998 .

[29]  John Kirriemuir,et al.  Literature Review in Games and Learning , 2004 .

[30]  Mike Treanor,et al.  Newsgames - Procedural Rhetoric Meets Political Cartoons , 2009, DiGRA Conference.

[31]  Karen Tanenbaum,et al.  The EventTable technique: distributed fiducial markers , 2009, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[32]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[33]  J. G. Tanenbaum,et al.  Futura: design for collaborative learning and game play on a multi-touch digital tabletop , 2010, TEI.

[34]  Y. Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design , 2002 .

[35]  John C. Tang,et al.  Liveboard: a large interactive display supporting group meetings, presentations, and remote collaboration , 1992, CHI.

[36]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[37]  E. Coiera.  Interaction Design , 2002 .