Path‐generation of articulated mechanisms by shape and topology variations in non‐linear truss representation

This paper presents studies on an optimization-based method for path-generation of articulated mechanisms. An extended truss ground-structure approach is taken in which both the shape and topology of the truss are designed using cross-sectional areas and nodal positions as design variables. This leads to a technique for simultaneous type and dimensional synthesis of articulated mechanisms. For the analysis part it is essential to control the mechanism configuration so that the mechanism remains within a given configuration space, thus stabilizing the optimization process and resulting in realistic solutions. This can be achieved by using the Levenberg–Marquardt method. The design method is illustrated by a number of design cases for both closed and open input and output paths. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Articulated mechanism design with a degree of freedom constraint , 2004 .

[2]  K. H. Hunt,et al.  Kinematic chains for robot hands. I: Orderly number-synthesis , 1995 .

[3]  John M. Hansen.  Synthesis of Mechanisms Using Time-Varying Dimensions , 2002 .

[4]  Daniel A. Tortorelli,et al.  An element removal and reintroduction strategy for the topology optimization of structures and compliant mechanisms , 2003 .

[5]  A. E. Samuel,et al.  Kinematic chains for robot hands—II. Kinematic constraints, classification, connectivity, and actuation , 1995 .

[6]  Cv Clemens Verhoosel,et al.  Non-Linear Finite Element Analysis of Solids and Structures , 1991 .

[7]  Nicholas I. M. Gould,et al.  Trust Region Methods , 2000, MOS-SIAM Series on Optimization.

[8]  T. E. Bruns,et al.  Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[9]  Francis C. Moon,et al.  Franz Reuleaux: Contributions to 19th century kinematics and theory of machines , 2003 .

[10]  Krister Svanberg,et al.  A Class of Globally Convergent Optimization Methods Based on Conservative Convex Separable Approximations , 2002, SIAM J. Optim..

[11]  Arthur G. Erdman,et al.  Computer-Aided Mechanism Design: Now and the Future , 1995 .

[12]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  On the Design of Compliant Mechanisms Using Topology Optimization , 1997 .

[13]  K. Svanberg.  The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[14]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Some Inverse Problems in Topology Design of Materials and Mechanisms , 1996 .

[15]  Mary Frecker,et al.  Topological synthesis of compliant mechanisms using multi-criteria optimization , 1997 .

[16]  C. Calladine.  Buckminster Fuller's “Tensegrity” structures and Clerk Maxwell's rules for the construction of stiff frames , 1978 .

[17]  J. Snyman,et al.  On nonassembly in the optimal dimensional synthesis of planar mechanisms , 2001 .

[18]  S. Pellegrino,et al.  Matrix analysis of statically and kinematically indeterminate frameworks , 1986 .

[19]  M. Kocvara,et al.  On the modelling and solving of the truss design problem with global stability constraints , 2002 .

[20]  A. Hernández,et al.  A PROCEDURE FOR THE OPTIMAL SYNTHESIS OF PLANAR MECHANISMS BASED ON NON-LINEAR POSITION PROBLEMS , 1997 .

[21]  Patrick W. Fowler,et al.  A symmetry extension of Maxwell's rule for rigidity of frames , 2000 .

[22]  J. Agirrebeitia,et al.  Second-order methods for the optimum synthesis of multibody systems , 2000 .

[23]  Ole Sigmund,et al.  Topology synthesis of large‐displacement compliant mechanisms , 2001 .

[24]  Atsushi Kawamoto,et al.  Design of planar articulated mechanisms using branch and bound , 2004, Math. Program..