Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness

Migration of cells in higher organisms is mediated by adhesion receptors, such as integrins, that link the cell to extracellular-matrix ligands, transmitting forces and signals necessary for locomotion1–4. Whether cells will migrate or not on a given substratum, and also their speed, depends on several variables related to integrin–ligand interactions, including ligand levels5,6, integrin levels7–9, and integrin–ligand binding affinities10–12. These and other13 factors affect the way molecular systems integrate to effect and regulate cell migration. Here we show that changes in cell migration speed resulting from three separate variables—substratum ligand level, cell integrin expression level, and integrin–ligand binding affinity—are all quantitatively predictable through the changes they cause in a single unifying parameter: short-term cell–substratum adhesion strength. This finding is consistent with predictions of a mathematical model for cell migration14. The ligand concentration promoting maximum migration speed decreases reciprocally as integrin expression increases. Increases in integrin–ligand affinity similarly result in maximal migration at reciprocally lower ligand concentrations. The maximum speed attainable, however, remains unchanged as ligand concentration, integrin expression, or integrin-ligand affinity vary, suggesting that integrin coupling with intracellular motors remains unaltered.

[1]  S. Santoro,et al.  Alteration of collagen-dependent adhesion, motility, and morphogenesis by the expression of antisense alpha 2 integrin mRNA in mammary cells. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[2]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Adhesion in cell migration. , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[3]  K. Jacobson,et al.  Forces exerted by locomoting cells. , 1994, Seminars in cell biology.

[4]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Maximal migration of human smooth muscle cells on fibronectin and type IV collagen occurs at an intermediate attachment strength , 1993, The Journal of cell biology.

[5]  F. Maxfield,et al.  Attachment to fibronectin or vitronectin makes human neutrophil migration sensitive to alterations in cytosolic free calcium concentration , 1991, The Journal of cell biology.

[6]  J. Guan,et al.  Stimulation of cell migration by overexpression of focal adhesion kinase and its association with Src and Fyn. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[7]  F. Giancotti,et al.  Elevated levels of the α 5 β 1 fibronectin receptor suppress the transformed phenotype of Chinese hamster ovary cells , 1990, Cell.

[8]  A. Frelinger,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies to ligand-occupied conformers of integrin alpha IIb beta 3 (glycoprotein IIb-IIIa) alter receptor affinity, specificity, and function. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  J. Murray,et al.  Three-dimensional dynamics of pseudopod formation and the regulation of turning during the motility cycle of Dictyostelium. , 1994, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  D A Lauffenburger,et al.  Mathematical model for the effects of adhesion and mechanics on cell migration speed. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[11]  D. Lauffenburger,et al.  Cell Migration: A Physically Integrated Molecular Process , 1996, Cell.

[12]  E. Ruoslahti,et al.  Motility of fibronectin receptor-deficient cells on fibronectin and vitronectin: collaborative interactions among integrins [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1992 Jul;118(1):217] , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[13]  M. Gawaz,et al.  Characterization of a gain of function mutation of integrin alpha IIb beta 3 (platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa). , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[14]  J. Thiery,et al.  Neural crest cell locomotion induced by antibodies to beta 1 integrins. A tool for studying the roles of substratum molecular avidity and density in migration. , 1991, Journal of cell science.

[15]  E. Elson,et al.  A mechanical function of myosin II in cell motility. , 1995, Journal of cell science.

[16]  A. Huttenlocher,et al.  Modulation of cell migration by integrin-mediated cytoskeletal linkages and ligand-binding affinity , 1996, Journal of Cell Biology.

[17]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin dynamics on the tail region of migrating fibroblasts. , 1996, Journal of cell science.

[18]  D. Cheresh Integrins: Structure, Function, and Biological Properties , 1993 .

[19]  M. Schwartz,et al.  Integrins: emerging paradigms of signal transduction. , 1995, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[20]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture. I. Movements of the leading edge. , 1970, Experimental cell research.

[21]  S. Goodman,et al.  The E8 subfragment of laminin promotes locomotion of myoblasts over extracellular matrix , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  E. Ruoslahti,et al.  Amino acid sequence of the human fibronectin receptor , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[23]  A. Horwitz,et al.  Dynamics of beta 1 integrin-mediated adhesive contacts in motile fibroblasts , 1992, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  F. Gaeta,et al.  Freezing adhesion molecules in a state of high-avidity binding blocks eosinophil migration , 1993, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  J. Vacanti,et al.  Tissue engineering : Frontiers in biotechnology , 1993 .

[26]  A. Frelinger,et al.  A beta 3 integrin mutation abolishes ligand binding and alters divalent cation-dependent conformation. , 1990, Science.

[27]  D. Cheresh,et al.  Integrins and cancer. , 1996, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  Richard O. Hynes,et al.  Integrins: Versatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion , 1992, Cell.